Skip to content


Falling - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: falling Year: 1929 Page 1 of about 318 results (0.049 seconds)
Dec 04 1929 (FN)

Henry Ford and Son, Inc. Vs. Little Falls Fibre Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Dec-04-1929

..... ford son inc v little falls fibre co no 47 argued december 4 1929 decide january 6 1930 280 u s ..... henry ford son inc v little falls fibre co 280 u s 369 1930 u s supreme court henry ford son inc v little falls fibre co 280 u s 369 1930 henry .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 05 1929 (FN)

Flink Vs. Paladini

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-05-1929

flink v paladini 279 u s 59 1929 u s supreme court flink v paladini 279 u s 59 1929...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 02 1929 (FN)

West Vs. Standard Oil Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-02-1929

..... department of justice and of the navy department appeared before secretary fall on june 8 1921 and presented the matter orally whereupon ..... hearing establish that this was the only matter considered by secretary fall that brief was entitled an argument in support of the ..... prevent the delay in the trial after some further discussion secretary fall asked is mr sutro s statement of the case practically .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 07 1929 (PC)

Abdul Gofur Mulla and anr. Vs. Kalidhan Mondal and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Aug-07-1929

Reported in: 124Ind.Cas.481

..... respondent auction purchaser contends that this is not a matter falling under section 47 of the code but there was an ..... referred as supporting the proposition that the matter in controversy falls within section 47 of the civil procedure code does not appear to ..... ground of irregularity fraud or otherwise is not a question falling under section 47 of the civil procedure code this however has never .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 07 1929 (PC)

Abdul Gafur Mulla and anr. Vs. Kalidham Mondal and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Aug-07-1929

Reported in: AIR1930Cal302

..... the respondent auction purchaser contends that this is not a matter falling under section 47 of the code but there was an appeal ..... judge has referred as supporting the proposition that the matter in controversy falls within section 47 civil p c does not appear to support ..... the ground of irregularity faud or otherwise is not a question falling under section 47 civil p c this however has never been .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 25 1929 (PC)

Dumbreck Vs. Addie and Sons (Collieries)

Court: House of Lords

Decided on: Feb-25-1929

..... categories into which persons visiting premises belonging to another person may fall they may go 1 by the invitation express or implied ..... judicial opinion 8212 in deciding into which category a particular case falls but a judge must decide and he having decided then ..... that the owner allows the fence enclosing his private property to fall into more or less permanent disrepair has a certain evidential .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 25 1929 (PC)

Lallubhai Pragji Vs. Bhimbhai Dajibhai

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jan-25-1929

Reported in: (1929)31BOMLR632

..... law then it is contended that the appeal might at any rate fall under section 109 c which provides for an appeal from any ..... of great public or private importance the case does not admittedly fall under the first clause of article 110 of the civil procedure code it is ..... applicant is accepted i think therefore that the case does not fall under the second clause of section 110 5 if the contention on .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 06 1929 (PC)

Khondkar Mahomed Saleh and ors. Vs. Chandra Kumar Mukerji and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Feb-06-1929

Reported in: AIR1930Cal34

..... mortgagor under civil p c order 34 rule 6 would not fall within the provisions of section 6 or in other words the ..... he did not avail himself of the opportunity his case does not fall within the exception formulated in the special bench case of gopeswar ..... terms take away any such right and in both it seems to fall within the general principle that the presumption against a retrospective construction .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 22 1929 (PC)

Monmohan Chowdhury Vs. Turner, Morrison and Co.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Apr-22-1929

Reported in: 124Ind.Cas.167

..... the section 37 of the revenue sale law as these did not fall within the exceptions mentioned under that section the lands in suit ..... a misapplication of the term to say that they can possibly fall within the description of a raiyat the subordinate judge has held ..... consequently the cadastral survey plot no 2312 must be held to fall within the fourth exception under section 37 of the revenue sale .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 22 1929 (PC)

Manmohan Chowdhury Vs. Turner, Morrison and Co.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Apr-22-1929

Reported in: AIR1930Cal69

..... provisions of section 37 revenue sale law as these did not fall within the exceptions mentioned under that section the lands in suit ..... a misapplication of the term to say that they can possibly fall within the description of a raiyat the subordinate judge has held ..... sale consequently the cadastral survey plot 2312 must be held to fall within the fourth exception under section 37 revenue sale law the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //