Fair Value - Judgment Search Results

Robinson Vs. Fair

Court: US Supreme Court

to James G. Fair, who, prior to the present litigation, put upon the lot substantial improvements of the value of several hundred thousand dollars. On the 6th of April, 1881, Caroline C. Hawes intermarried with James A. … Robinson v. Fair - 128 U.S. 53 (1888) U.S. Supreme Court Robinson v. Fair, 128 U.S. 53 (1888) Robinson v. Fair

M/S Fair Communciation and Consultant. Vs. Surender Kardile

Court: Supreme Court of India

1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.106 OF2010REPORTABLE M/S FAIR COMMUNICATION AND CONSULTANTS & ANR. SURENDRA KERDILE S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.VERSUS JUDGMENT ...APPELLANT(S) ...RESPONDENT(S) This appeal by Special … the transaction was 2,30,000/-, though the document ₹ 1,30,000/-. The court noted that subsequently executed showed a lesser value as Surendra had not relied upon these circumstances to seek relief on the basis of the contract (for

M/S. Fair Air Engineers Pvt. Ltd. and Another Vs. N.K. Modi

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1997SC533; 1997(1)ARBLR23(SC); 1997(2)BLJR1316; [1997]88CompCas663(SC); 1996(2)CTC664; JT1996(8)SC253; 1996(6)SCALE488; (1996)6SCC385; [1996]Supp4SCR820; MANU/SC/0141/1997

dispute between the parties before, it after giving reasonable opportunity to the parties, consistent with the principles of fair play and natural justice. It is not necessary that porkpie vigore it is enforceable. The mere fact that

Trade Fair Authority of Haryana and Ors vs.ajay Jain

Court: Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.818/2006 + % TRADE FAIR AUTHORITY OF HARYANA AND ORS. 5th December, 2018 AJAY JAIN ..... Appellants Ms. Noopur Singhal, Advocate for Mr.

Fair Deal Leather Suppliers vs the Value Added Tax Officer & Anr.

Court: Delhi

SUPPLIERSDELHI - 110005,FY 2008-09(THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR KAMAL KISHORE KAIM).....PETITIONERThrough: Mr. Mukesh Gupta and Mr. Keshav Rai, Advs.Versus1. THE VALUE ADDED TAX OFFICER,WARD NO. 45BIKRIKAR BHAWANNEW DELHI 110002.....RESPONDENT NO. 12. COMMISSIONER OF DELHI VALUE ADDED TAX,DEPARTMENT OF TRADE

Fairly Syiem Vs. the Khasi Hills Autonomous District Council and ors.

Court: Guwahati

and means to punish the person concerned which may result in napotism, favouritism and against the principles of fair play and natural justice. In the instant case, I find there is a violation of the principal of

Forum for Fairness in Education and ors. Vs. University of Mumbai and ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2003(3)ALLMR398; 2003(4)BomCR9; 2004(3)MhLj119

The case of the petitioners is that petitioner No. 1 is a registered non-Government organisation established for seeking fairness in education and working for eradication of unfair practices in the field of education. Petitioners No. 2 to

Fashion Fair Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: 2009(236)ELT19(P& H); 2009[13]STR496; [2009]21STT41

Matched in: Parties Fashion Fair Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Fair Deal Agencies and anr. Vs. Inner Mongolia Muwang Animal By-produc ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2008(1)CTLJ169(Del); 150(2008)DLT623; 2008(101)DRJ306

Matched in: Parties Fair Deal Agencies and anr. Vs. Inner Mongolia Muwang Animal By-product Company Limited and ors.

May Fair Investment Pvt Ltd Vs. ----

Court: Delhi

NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:30th November, 2012 % + CO. APPL. (M) 182/2012 IN THE MATTER OF MAY FAIR INVESTMENT PVT LTD ..... Petitioner/ Transferor Company No. 1 AND PRAKAUSALI INVESTMENT (INDIA) PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner/ Transferor … of the written consents/NOC given by all the equity shareholders and unsecured creditors consents which constitute 80.62% in value and 88.88% in numbers in compliance with the provisions of Section 391(2) of the Companies Act. 1956. Hence