Factory - Judgment Search Results

Baranagore Jute Factory Plc. Mazdoor Sangh (Bms) Etc. Vs. Baranagore J ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 4298-4299 OF2017(Arising out of S.L.P.(Civil) Nos.25733-25734/2015) BARANAGORE JUTE FACTORY PLC. MAZDOOR SANGH (BMS) ETC. ... APPELLANT (S) VERSUS BARANAGORE JUTE FACTORY PLC. ETC. ... RESPONDENT (S) WITH

Baranagore Jute Factory Plc. Mazdoor Sangh (Bms) Etc. Vs. Baranagore J ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

APPELLATE JURISDICTION NON-REPORTABLE I.A. NOS.13 TO36OF2017 IA NO.61787/2017 AND IA NO.77072/2017 CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 4298-4299/2017 IN BARANAGORE JUTE FACTORY PLC. MAZDOOR SANGH (BMS) APPELLANT(S) VERSUS BARANAGORE JUTE FACTORY PLC. ETC. RESPONDENT(S) CONMT.PET.(C) NOS. 824-827/2017 IN C.A. NOS.

Laxmi Gudakhu Factory Vs. Avinash Gudakhu Factory

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: AIR2000MP305

which is being used as toothpaste. It carries on business in the name and style of 'Laxmi Gudakhu Factory' and sells its product under the registered trade-mark 'Saraswati Chhap Gudakhu'. The label of the said product is

Cimmco Wagon Factory Mazdoor Sangh Vs. Cimmco Wagon Factory and 2 ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 1993(3)WLC433; 1992WLN(UC)79

a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the workmen represented by CIMMCO Wagon Factory Mazdoor Sangh, praying for the issue of a writ of certiorari queshing the order'passed by the Industrial Tribunal,

Ordinance Clothing Factory Workers Union Rep. by Its Secretary, N.J. R ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2009)6MLJ269

ORDERS. Nagamuthu, J.1. 'Whether the employees of the Ordinance Clothing Factory and Heavy Vehicles Factory, Avadi, Chennai, the defence establishments under the Ministry of Defence, are subject to the

Kanhaiyalal Agrawal and ors. Vs. the Factory Manager and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2001VIIIAD(SC)77; AIR2001SC3645; [2001(91)FLR380]; JT2001(7)SC571; (2001)IILLJ1239SC; 2001(6)SCALE300; (2001)9SCC609; 2001(4)SCT428(SC); (2001)3UPLBEC2515

workmen were charged that on 9.2.1979 when Kanhaiyala Agrawal was to duty on trailer weigh bridge of the factory gate from 2 a.m. to 10 a.m. in collusion with Harihar Giri, center Incharge, Ramesh Chandra Savita, Harihar

Workmen of Motipur Sugar Factory (Private) Limited Vs. Motipur Sugar F ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1965SC1803; 1966(0)BLJR258; [1965(11)FLR112]; (1965)IILLJ162SC; [1965]3SCR588

November and December1960. It appears that from the season 1956-57, the respondent introduced anincentive bonus scheme in the factory. The scheme continued thereafter fromseason to season with certain changes. It also appears that in the beginning ofeach

Jana Handloom Weaving Factory and Furniture Suppliers and ors. Vs. Lax ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1980)82BOMLR277; 1979MhLJ577

22nd January, 1963, which was purchased by one Maniklal Narayandas Pankhewale. According to the plaintiffs viz., Laxmi Handloom Factory the auction purchaser Maniklal Narayandas had taken three-fourth of the amount from them for payment in Court and

The Workmen of Laxmi Starch Factory Ltd. Vs. Laxmi Starch Factory Ltd. ...

Court: Kerala

Reported in: (1974)IILLJ84Ker

J.1. An award of the Industrial Tribunal, Alleppey in a dispute between the Management of the Laxmi Starch Factory and its workmen is challenged in these original petitions. The issues referred for adjudication to the Tribunal were-1.

Workmen of Commonwealth Hosiery Factory, Mangalore and ors. Vs. Common ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1958KAR206; (1960)ILLJ143Kant

Matched in: Parties Workmen of Commonwealth Hosiery Factory, Mangalore and ors. Vs. Commonwealth Hosiery Factory, Mangalore and ors.