F Thus - Judgment Search Results

The Minister of Safety and Security Vs. F

Court: South Africa Supreme Court of Appeal

existence of the rule of vicarious liability is that the employer creates the risk of harm and should thus be liable when the harm occurs.16Having reiterated what is in effect the standard test later referred to in … On appeal from: Western Cape High Court (Bozalek J sitting as court of first instance). The appeal is upheld. The orders

Erach F.D. Mehta Vs. Minoo F.D. Mehta

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1971SC1653; (1970)2SCC724; [1971]2SCR99

Shah, J.1. This appeal with special leave is filed against the judgment of a single Judge of the High Court of Bombay dismissing a petition under Section

Mr F Jesus Sagaya Raj vs Mrs F Philomina

Court: Karnataka

OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.32918 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: MR F JESUS SAGAYA RAJ S/O LATE D. FRANCIS, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.241/1, ABBAIAH REDDY LAYOUT, 7TH

F.C.i. Class Iv Employees Union Vs. F.C.i.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (1994)IILLJ102P& H

appropriate Government in respect of the establishments of the Food Corporation in the State of Punjab. It was thus not even remotely concerned with the consideration of the matter. It was for the Punjab Government to consider … ORDERJawaharlal Gupta, J. 1. Is the Food Corporation of India not entitled to employ a watchman as contract labour? This is the short question that

F.A.B. Axles (P) Ltd. Vs. F.A.G. Rugelfischer Georg Schafer

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1997VAD(Delhi)637; 1997(2)ARBLR453(Delhi); 68(1997)DLT433; 1997(42)DRJ517

seek. As such in the facts and circumstances it was necessary to grant injunction as prayed for and, thus, proceeded to pass the impugned order granting injunction and appointing local commissioner. Learned Single Judge also took note … Single Judge in is 6064/96 and is 6065/96 (in Suit No.1516/96). On 4.2.1997 learned Single Judge passed the following orders in the suit as well in the two misc. applications:'S.No.1516/96 2. One Mr. Devinder Singh appears for

F.C.i. Deputationists Association and ors. Vs. F.C.i. and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (1991)1CALLT176(HC),1990LabIC199,(1992)ILLJ697Cal,1990(4)SLR41

satisfactory service, shall be placed in the immediate next higher scale of pay, his designation, however, remaining unchanged.5. Thus, according to the present writ petitioners, who are all deputationists, the employees who had completed 18 years of … Paritosh Kumar Mukherjee, J.1. Food Corporation of India Deputationists Association and others moved this writ petition on January 6, 1989, and, inter alia,

U.F.M. Manju Ramakrishna Naik Vs. U.F.M. Umesh Shridhar Shanbagh

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: AIR1977Kant156; ILR1977KAR997; 1977(1)KarLJ445

Mills & Ginning Factory v. Subashchandra Yogaraj Sinha, : [1962]2SCR159 . Briefly, the contention formulated may be stated thus: Having regard to the prohibition enacted in the main clause of sub-s. (1) of S. 21 of the … 100, Civil P. C. and directed against the decree in R. A. No. 139 of 1970 on the file of the Civil Judge, Karwar, dismissing the appeal of the appellant and affirming the decree in 0. S.

F.A.C.T. Employees' Association Vs. F.A.C.T. Limited and Ors.

Court: Kerala

Reported in: (1977)ILLJ182Ker

end on the date on which the award becomes enforceable under Section 17A. A reference under Section 10 thus sets is motion adjudication proceedings and they cannot stop except by the passing of an award. A reference … Kochu Thommen, J.1. Exhibit PI award is challenged in these two original petitions. An industrial dispute arose between Fertilisers and Chemicals Travancore Ltd., Udyogamandal (hereinafter referred to as the company) and its workmen represented by eight unions.

F.A.C.T. Employees' Association and Ors. Vs. Management of F.A.C.T. Lt ...

Court: Kerala

Reported in: (1983)ILLJ240Ker

K.K. Narendran, J.1. Some nice questions in industrial law arise for consideration in this case. The questions are:(1) When there is already a conciliation settlement under Section 12 of

R.F.C. Officers Association Vs. R.F.C. and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: [1990(60)FLR286]; (1991)ILLJ505Raj

1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging the orders Annexure-7 dated July 22, 1987 and Annexure-II, dated December 12, 1987. On