Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Eyr - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

1853

Eyre Vs. Potter

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-01-1853

Eyre v. Potter - 56 U.S. 42 (1853) U.S. Supreme Court Eyre v. Potter, 56 U.S. 15 How. 42


May 29 1997

Eyre Smelting Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: May-29-1997

Reported in: (1997)(96)ELT463TriDel

1. The order-in-original dated 12-9-1988 passed by the Additional Collector of Central Excise, Calcutta-I is under challenge in this appeal.2. Appellant, engaged in the manufacture of soldering and flux materials classifiable under old T.I. 68, had...


Jan 12 1978

Commissioner of Income-tax and Super Profits Tax Vs. Eyre Smelting Pvt ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jan-12-1978

Reported in: [1979]118ITR857(Cal)

the instance of the Commissioner of I.T. and S.P.T., West Bengal-III, arises out of the assessment of Messrs. Eyre Smelting Private Ltd., Calcutta, the assessee, to super profits tax in the assessment year 1963-64, the relevant accounting


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 08 1978

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Eyre Smelting P. Ltd.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Feb-08-1978

Reported in: [1978]114ITR51(Cal)

limitation '2. The facts found and/or admitted are that one W. J. Woodhouse had been employed by the Eyre Smelting Private Ltd., the assessee, at the material time. After the personal assessments of Woodhouse for the assessment


Jun 20 1956

State of Bombay Vs. Morarji Padamsey of E. Eyres and Co.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jun-20-1956

Reported in: AIR1956Bom715; (1956)58BOMLR801; ILR1956Bom940

Chagia, C.J. 1. A rather novel and indigenious contention was put forward by the aesessee in this reference.The facts briefly are that the assessee registered his business under the Sales Act on 1-10-1946 and conducted his...


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial