Extensive - Judgment Search Results

Green Park Extension vs State Nct of Delhi & Ors.

Court: Delhi

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 9888/2021 and CM APPL. 30453/2021, CM APPL. GREEN PARK EXTENSION .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhimanyu Tewari, along with Mr. Kanishk Batt, Advocates.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through:

Green Park Extension Residents Association Vs. Municipal Corp. of Delh ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2008(103)DRJ577

Kailash Gambhir, J.1. By this writ petition filed by the Green Park Extension Residents Association mandamus has been sought for the removal of unauthorized construction raised by the office of Chief

Sushant Lok Extension Residents Welfare Association Vs. State of Harya ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1 CWP No.9584 of 2012 Date of Decision : February 11, 2013 Sushant Lok Extension Residents Welfare Association ........Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...... Respondents 2. CWP No.9573 of 2012 Prem

All Assam Extension Officer's (Credit) Association and Ors. Vs. State ...

Court: Guwahati

R.S. Mongia, C.J. (Acting) 1. All Assam Extension Officers (Credit) Association through its President had filed a Writ Petition challenging the validity of Order 3 and

Osmangunj Extension Co-operative Society Limited, Rep. by Its Secretar ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1994(1)ALT5

in the Court of the IV Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. The plaintiff (appellant) is the Osmangunj Extension Co-operative Society limited, which was formed for the purpose of construction of Shops and Godowns for its members

Diplomatic Enclave Extension Co-operative House Building Society Ltd. ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1994IIIAD(Delhi)1207; 55(1994)DLT410; 1994(30)DRJ285

his choice, on November 22, 1959. According to the Respondent No.1, he and his family members, also contributed extensive lands, i.e. about 15000 sq. yds to strengthen the case of the Society, for acquisition of further land

Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Limited Vs. Sukhpreet Singh Kang

Court: Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC UT Chandigarh

œTo M/s Omaxe Chd. Ext. DE, Chandigarh? whereas, the complete address of the Opposite Party was œOmaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Limited, SCO No.143-144, First Floor, Sector 8-C, Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160008?. Since the letter Annexure R-2 and

Extension Centre for TIn Cans and Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1983)LC657DTri(Delhi)

Production Centre for Electric Motors, Tiruvalla located in the State of Kerala whereas the other appellant is the Extension Centre for Tin Cans and Tin Printing, Muvattupuzha, also located in the same State. Both these Centres are

Eastern Extension Telegraph Co., Ltd. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Eastern Extension Telegraph Co., Ltd. v. United States - 231 U.S. 326 (1913) U.S. Supreme Court Eastern Extension Telegraph Co.,

Eastern Extension Tel. Co. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

in which claimant alleged with much detail that the government of the United States had used the cables extensively for official messages, which had been given precedence and had been transmitted, as required by the terms of