Expression - Judgment Search Results

Air India Express Employees Union (Aixeu) Represented by Its President ...

Court: Kerala

THE 15TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 25TH PHALGUNA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 3960 OF 2024 PETITIONER: AIR INDIA EXPRESS EMPLOYEES UNION (AIXEU) REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT MR. K.K VIJAYKUMAR REG. NO: TU 19449, AFFILIATION NO: KL/380 BMS

The Indian Express Limited Vs. Express Publications Madurai Limited an ...

Court: Delhi

other medium also came to the share of the plaintiff-company. Defendant No. 1 was permitted to use the expression "New Indian Express" for publication of an English daily newspaper in the above-referred southern States and Union Territories.

Express Publications Madurai Limited Vs. Indian Express Newspapers Mum ...

Court: Mumbai

accounts in terms of the All India Advertisement Revenue Sharing Agreements/Arrangements based on circulation figures of the Indian Express and the New Indian Express, certified by ABC or as per the ABC guidelines from 1st April, 2005

Express Publications Madurai Limited Vs. Indian Express Newspapers Mum ...

Court: Mumbai

accounts in terms of the All India Advertisement Revenue Sharing Agreements/Arrangements based on circulation figures of the Indian Express and the New Indian Express, certified by ABC or as per the ABC guidelines from 1st April, 2005

Express Newspapers Ltd. Vs. Indian Express Newspapers (Bom) Ltd.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1997(40)DRJ311

1946 and is an existing Company within the meaning of Companies Act, 1956, having its registered office at Express Estates, Clubhouse Road, Anna Salai, Madras and a Branch Office at Express Building, Bahadurshah Zafar Marg, New Delhi.

Indian Express Employees Union Vs. Indian Express (Madurai) Ltd. and a ...

Court: Kerala

Reported in: (1999)ILLJ490Ker

The Orissa High Court relied on the Madras decision only for the purpose of understanding the meaning of expression 'termination of service' appearing in item No. 8 of Schedule to the Act. Therefore the Orissa decision also

Indian Express Newspaper (Bombay) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of West Bengal a ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 2005(1)CHN390,[2006(106)FLR467],(2005)IILLJ333Cal

employees of the Delhi office who were employed outside the State of Delhi. On an analysis of the expression 'appropriate Government' within the meaning of Section 2 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, the Hon'ble Supreme Court

Indian Express (Madurai) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [2000]244ITR341(Mad)

Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, in Civil Appeal No. 1633(NT) of 1974 dated April 2, 1986 (Indian Express (P.) Ltd. v. State of Tamil Nadu [1987] 67 STC 474, wherein the Supreme Court held that the

General Secretary, American Express Bank Union Vs. American Express Ba ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (2000)ILLJ277SC

New Delhi, on December 4, 1986. The dispute so referred was:Whether the action of the management of American Express International Banking Corporation, New Delhi in refusing employment to the son of Shri D.R. Kashyap, Head Messenger on

Workmen of American Express International Banking Corporation Vs. Mana ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1986SC458; [1985(51)FLR481]; (1985)IILLJ539SC; 1985(2)SCALE1393; (1985)4SCC71; 1986(1)LC228(SC)

calculation is to be made, has actually worked under the employer for not less than 240 days. The expression which we are required to construe is 'actually worked under the employer'. This expression, according to us, cannot