Export Value - Judgment Search Results

Exporters Vs. Butterworth-judson Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Exporters v. Butterworth-Judson Co. - 258 U.S. 365 (1922) U.S. Supreme Court Exporters v. Butterworth-Judson Co., 258 U.S. 365

Gokuldas Exports Vs. JaIn Exports (P) Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2003(90)ECC806; 2003(157)ELT243(SC); JT2003(Suppl1)SC14; 2003(7)SCALE242; (2003)10SCC338

both the parties to the suit are in import-export business. The appellant obtained an import licence of the value of Rs. 1,91,28,382/- which was split into two licences, one for Rs. 1,00,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore) only and … 11th July, 1983 stating that they had discussed the matter with the Joint Chief Controller of Imports and Exports and they were informed that Letter of Authority facility had been withdrawn under the new Policy. Appellant was

Trimurti Exports and Ors. Vs. Modelama Exports Ltd

Court: Delhi

OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 25, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 4105/2014 & Crl.M.As.14090/14, 14542/14 TRIMURTI EXPORTS & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Virender Goswami, Ms. Soni Singh, Ms.

Ms.Seasons Exports. Vs. Samhit Exports and ors.

Court: Chennai

Instruments Act stating that it is carrying on business of supplying fabrics and it supplied fabric to the value of Rs.4,29,658/- as per the instruction of the third accused / third respondent under Ex.P2-Invoice. The third respondent … one and the same is not maintainable, because, the cheque had been issued in the name of M/s.Seasons Exports Pvt. Ltd. and the complaint had been filed by one M/s.Seasons Exports. Therefore, both the companies are different

Alaska Export USA Inc. Vs. Alaska Exports, rep. by its Managing Partne ...

Court: Chennai Madurai

appearing for the respondents 1 to 3. 3. On 1.10.2001, an agreement was entered into between (1) Alaska Export, a Partnership Firm, having its office at Karur, who is the first respondent herein, represented by its partners … granted a declaration that the respondents herein are obliged to pay a commission of 5% of the FOB value of textile goods sold by the respondents for a period of 10 years from 30.3.2007. 5. On the

Maharaja Exports and anr. Vs. Apparels Export Promotion Council

Court: Delhi

Reported in: [1986]60CompCas353(Delhi)

illegal.(20) On the second aspect the facts mentioned in the plaint are to be taken on its face value. In paragraph 14of the unamended plaint the plaintiff alleged that the. impugned notice dated 4-4-1984 was posted only … M.K. Chawla, J.(1) The plaintiff Mis. Maharaja Exports through its sole proprietor M/s. Sushma Gulati has claimed the following reliefs in her .suit for declaration :

Assambrook Exports Ltd. and anr. Vs. Export Credit Guarantee Corpn. of ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1998Cal1

Contract of Insurance/Policy cover issued by the respondent No. 1 to the petitioner No. 1 in respect of export of tea to Kazakhstan.' 2. The basic fact of the matter is not much in dispute.3. On or … the first respondent was bound to hone-units promise to pay the insured amout i.e. 75% of the insured value in terms of the aforementioned agreement and it having failed to do so, the petitioners are. entitled to

Ceenik Exports Ltd. Vs. Cc (Exports)

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2005)(189)ELT172Tri(Mum.)bai

1. The appellant is a manufacturer exporter and is a recognized Export House. He filed 7 Shipping Bills under claim for Drawback in respect of … ready-made garments i.e Ladies Blouses made of Cotton Power-loom fabrics as well as Rayon power-loom fabrics. The FOB value declared for full sleeve blouse is U.S $8/- per piece for rayon fabrics and U.S $7.50 per piece

Marine Products Export Development Authority, vs M/S. Ocean Gems Expor ...

Court: Kerala

THE ORDER IN WP(C) 2481/2022 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3 IN WPC:1 MARINE PRODUCTS EXPORT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, MPEDA HOUSE, PANAMPILLY AVENUE, P.B.NO.4272, COCHIN-682 036. 2 CHAIRMAN, MARINE PRODUCTS EXPORTS

Apparel Export Promotion Coucil Vs. All India Garment Exporters

Court: Delhi

COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 25th January, 2012 + LPA No. 356/2011 % APPAREL EXPORT PROMOTION COUCIL ....Appellant Through: Mr. Krishan Venugopal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Gaurav Ray, Adv. Versus ALL INDIA GARMENT … to become a voting member of the appellant, the exporter was required to have exports of the minimum value of `20 lacs for the previous three years. Needless to state that the respondents/writ petitioners are exporters who