Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: recent Year: 2003 Page 3 of about 4,629 results (0.101 seconds)

Oct 29 2003 (HC)

Sstate Vs. Mohd. Afzal and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-29-2003

Reported in : 2003VIIAD(Delhi)1; 107(2003)DLT385; 2003(71)DRJ178; 2003(3)JCC1669

..... proclaimed offenders. reports from cfsl were collected and made a part of investigation record. he obtained sanction from the concerned authority under section 50 of pota and under section 7 of explosive substances act and section 196 cr.p.c. he recorded sstate ments of witnesses as and when required. he obtained the post-mortem reports of the ..... in respect of the deposition by him as to what material was placed and considered by the commissioner of police. thus, the sanction accorded under section 7 of the explosive substances act meets the requirement of law.160. we may now note the fourth issue raised by the defense. contention raised was that pota had certain statutory ..... ), it, thereforee, cannot be said that there was no valid sanction.159. turning to the second sanction accorded by the commissioner of police under section 7 of the explosive substances act, pw-12 has deposed that file was put up to the commissioner of police which contained copy of the fir, list of accused persons and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 29 2003 (HC)

State. Vs. Mohd. Afzal and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-29-2003

..... proclaimed offenders. reports from cfsl were collected and made a part of investigation record. he obtained sanction from the concerned authority under section 50 of pota and under section 7 of explosive substances act and section 196 cr.p.c. he recorded statements of witnesses as and when required. he obtained the post-mortem reports of the terrorists ..... ), it, therefore, cannot be said that there was no valid sanction.159. turning to the second sanction accorded by the commissioner of police under section 7 of the explosive substances act, pw-12 has deposed that file was put up to the commissioner of police which contained copy of the fir, list of accused persons and ..... respect of the deposition by him as to what material was placed and considered by the commissioner of police. thus, the sanction accorded under section 7 of the explosive substances act meets the requirement of law.160. we may now note the fourth issue raised by the defense. contention raised was that pota had certain .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 27 2003 (HC)

Surender Singh Bajaj Vs. Harmeet Singh Sethi and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-27-2003

Reported in : 2004(1)ALD91; 2004(1)ALT430; 2004(1)ARBLR436(AP)

..... dealership of the appellant. clause 20 of the said agreement also requires the dealer to observe and comply with the provisions of the petroleum act, explosives act and the weights and measurements act, 1976 and the rules and regulations made thereunder.18. the apex court on analyzing clause 30 of the dealership agreement observed that the ..... ., : [1963]3scr209 , and jaikishan v. l. kanoria & co., : air1974sc1579 .10. the learned counsel for the respondents further submits that inasmuch as section 3 of the benami transactions (prohibition) act, 1988, prohibits purchase of property benami, the alleged purchase of property by the applicant under the alleged agreement dated 6-2-1990, in the names of the ..... to them. on the complaint being referred to banjara hills police station, the police registered the same as fir no. 556/2001, dated 21-10-2001 under sections 379, 420, 467, 468 and 471 i.p.c. the applicant states that when he made an application to the economic offences court, nampally, for .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 14 2003 (HC)

Veena Kumari and ors. Vs. Jasbir Singh and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-14-2003

Reported in : III(2004)ACC90; 2003VIIAD(Delhi)558

..... differently. hence, we are disposed to adopt the rule in claims for compensation made in respect of motor accidents.'no fault liability' envisages in section 140 of the mv act is distinguishable from the rule of strict liability. in the former the compensation amount is fixed and is payable even if any one of the ..... calibrated work the learned author has pointed out that 'over the years rylands v. fletcher has been applied to a remarkable variety of things: fire, gas, explosions, electricity, oil noxious fumes, colliery spoil, rusty wire from a decayed fence, vibrations, poisonous vegetation.................'. he has elaborated seven defenses recognized in common law against ..... amount awarded by the tribunal. thereforee, these two are resting on two different premises. we are, thereforee, of the opinion that even apart from section 140 of the mv act, a victim in an accident which occurred while using a motor vehicle, is entitled to get compensation from a tribunal unless any one of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 09 2003 (HC)

Sulochana and ors. Vs. Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-09-2003

Reported in : II(2004)ACC534; 2005ACJ849; ILR2003KAR4911

..... passengers travelling in the same. a claim petition for payment of compensation was originally filed by the widow, minor, children and the parents of the deceased under section 166 of the motor vehicles act before the tribunal at bangalore. the said petition was subsequently amended so as to make a claim for compensation on no fault basis in terms of ..... as a result of the over turning of the tanker, the petrol contained in it started leaking and got collected nearby. few hours after the initial accident, an explosion took place in the petrol tanker resulting in a fire causing burn injuries to a number of persons who had gathered there to collect petrol that was leaking from the ..... to the conclusion that even when the tanker in question had turned turtle and could not be moved unless it was once again put back on wheels yet the explosion resulting in injuries to the people who had gathered to collect petrol was an accident arising out of the use of the vehicle. the following passages from the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 08 2003 (SC)

M.D., Army Welfare Housing Organisation Vs. Sumangal Services Pvt. Ltd ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-08-2003

Reported in : AIR2004SC1344; 2003(3)ARBLR361(SC); JT2003(Suppl2)SC300; 2003(8)SCALE424; (2004)9SCC619; [2003]48SCL344(SC)

..... in kuju collieries ltd. v. jharknand mines ltd. and ors. : [1975]1scr703 this court held that in relation to a contract which is hit by section 23 of the contract act section 75 and section 70 of the contract act shall not apply. only in a case where a contract has become void due to subsequent happenings, the advantage gained by a person should be ..... one of three possible reasons would have imputed negligence to the shipowners. it was held by the house of lords that, since the charterers were unable to prove that the explosion was caused by the fault of the owners, the defence of frustration succeeded and the contract was discharged. it should perhaps be rioted that in many cases a self- ..... never explained. the rule is open to the objection that the charterer is much less likely than the owner to be able to show how the explosion occurred. this reasoning does, indeed, prevail in one group of cases: a person to whom goods have been bailed, and who seeks to rely on their destruction as a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 07 2003 (TRI)

Century Cement Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Oct-07-2003

Reported in : (2004)(165)ELT534TriDel

..... of the apex court judgment in jaypee rewa cement supra shows that modvat credit is available to an assessee in respect of the explosives used for the manufacture of intermediate product which product is then used in the manufacture of the final product. but after the amendment ..... ltd. - 2002 (147) e.l.t. 877 and that for the earlier period, the appellants had been allowed modvat credit on the explosives. he had also submitted that the amended definition of the input which came into force from 1-7-2000 did not stand on a ..... 83.587/- which has been confirmed against them through the impugned order-in-appeal by the commissioner (appeals), by disallowing them modvat credit on explosives used outside the factory premises.2. the learned counsel has contended that the case of the appellants stands squarely covered by jaypee rewa cement ..... terms of the stay order shall result in dismissal of the appeal without prior notice under section 35f of the act. to come up for reporting compliance on 19-11-2003. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 25 2003 (SC)

Durga Prasad Gupta Vs. the State of Rajasthan Through C.B.i.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-25-2003

Reported in : 97(2004)CLT489(SC); JT2003(Suppl1)SC586; 2003(8)SCALE107; (2003)12SCC257; 2004(1)LC62(SC)

..... 1. appellant was found guilty of offences punishable under section 5 of terrorist and disruptive activities (prevention) act, 1987 (in short the 'tada act'), sections 4 and 5 of the explosive substances act, 1908 (in short the 'explosive act') and section 9b of explosives act, 1884 (in short the 'act') read with rule 115 of the explosives rules, 1983 (in short the 'rules'). 2. ..... with sections 3(1), 5 and 6 of tada act, sections 3, 4 and 5 and 6 of the explosives act and section 9b of the act and section 3(3) and 6 of tada act, sections 4 and 5 and 6 of explosive act and section 9b of the act. accused krishna gopal soni has committed offence punishable under section 9b of the act.15. ..... him and he was falsely implicated.16. learned trial judge found the accused guilty for offences punishable under section 5 of the tada act, sections 4 and 5 of the explosive act and section 9b of the act, after considering the evidence. he was sentenced to undergo five years imprisonment and to pay a fine of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 23 2003 (SC)

Sukhwant Singh @ Balwinder Singh Vs. State Through C.B.i.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-23-2003

Reported in : AIR2003SC3362; 97(2004)CLT393(SC); 2003CriLJ4974; JT2003(Suppl2)SC420; 2004(2)MhLj36; 2004MPLJ46(SC); 2003(8)SCALE39; (2003)8SCC90; 2004(1)LC172(SC)

..... is arrayed as accused no. 4 along with 8 other accused persons was charged for various offences like section 3(3) of the tada act, section 120b read with sections 5 and 6 of the explosive substances act section 9b and 9c of the said. explosive act. of the said 9 accused, 3 had pleaded guilty before the tada court and their case was ..... appellant herein was accused no. 4 in the said case and has been held guilty of an offence punishable under section 120 ipc, sections 3 and 6(1) of the tada act, section 5 of the explosive substances act, 1908 read with section 120b ipc and had been sentenced to a maximum sentence of 5 years' ri under the main count and has ..... our earlier judgment reported in 2003 (4) scale 402, we held thus :(i) if the confessional statement is properly recorded, satisfying the mandatory provision of section 15 of the tada act and the rules made thereunder, and if the same is found by the court as having been made voluntarily and truthful then the said confession is sufficient .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 19 2003 (TRI)

Anil Chemical and Industries Vs. the Commissioner of Central

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-19-2003

Reported in : (2003)(158)ELT759Tri(Mum.)bai

..... to rs. 4,10,27,681/- by alleging that plot no. 48 and 49 are in fact one unit and explosives emerges at plot no. 48 and 49, as a result of application of section vi of the central excise tariff act. it was further stated that bmd vehicle cannot be treated as workshop, consequently exemption granted to goods manufactured in a workshop ..... .9.1994 to dec. 1996, by invoking the extended period of limitation in terms of section 11-a of the central excise act, besides the allegation of manufacture of explosives at plot no. 48 and 49, in view of note 2 to section vi of the central excise tariff act, revenue alleged that appellant had recovered the amount of central excise duty from the customer .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //