Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: recent Court: mumbai Year: 2003 Page 1 of about 486 results (0.187 seconds)

NitIn Shankar Kadkol Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : I(2004)DMC695; 2004(2)MhLj767

..... so as to bring it within the purview of the 'death occurring otherwise than in normal circumstances'. the expression 'son before' is very relevant where section 113-b of the evidence act and section 304-b indian penal code are pressed into service. prosecution is obliged to show that soon before the occurrence there was cruelty or harassment and only in ..... room and the deceased had kept water for boiling on the stove. after pumping the stove, she lighted a match stick near the burner when there was a sudden explosion and her clothes caught fire. she shouted for help and hearing her screams, her husband i.e. the petitioner came out of the bath-room and threw water ..... the marriage but not having a connection with the marriage of the parties will not constitute demand for 'dowry'. this is clear from the qualifying clause of section 2 in act 28 of 1961 reproduced above. cruelty and harassment by a husband or a relative of the husband which brings about unnatural death of the wife within 7 years .....

Securities and Exchange Board of India Vs. Sangeeta Jayesh Valia

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (2004)2CompLJ347(Bom); [2004]50SCL641(Bom)

..... ,50,000, in both the cases.7. the respondent therefore, preferred two appeals, before the securities appellate tribunal, mumbai, under section 29 read with section 15j of sebi act on 29-8-2000, against the above orders. the said appeals were contested by the present appellant. after hearing both the parties ..... speech or law case esp. for newspaper publication, house of commons debate on bill when reported periodical statement on public work. 3. sound of explosion.as per webster dictionary 1959 edition 'information 'means: 1. knowledge communicated or received concerning a particular fact or circumstance, news information concerning a crime ..... only) for violation of regulation 3(4), sebi (substantial acquisition of shares and takeover) regulations 1997 (for short takeover regulations, 1997) and section 15a(b) of sebi act, against the respondent, (original appellant), were set-aside. thereby appeals filed by the respondent herein, were allowed. therefore, the appellants herein (original .....

Anil Chemical and Industries Vs. the Commissioner of Central

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in : (2003)(158)ELT759Tri(Mum.)bai

..... to rs. 4,10,27,681/- by alleging that plot no. 48 and 49 are in fact one unit and explosives emerges at plot no. 48 and 49, as a result of application of section vi of the central excise tariff act. it was further stated that bmd vehicle cannot be treated as workshop, consequently exemption granted to goods manufactured in a workshop ..... .9.1994 to dec. 1996, by invoking the extended period of limitation in terms of section 11-a of the central excise act, besides the allegation of manufacture of explosives at plot no. 48 and 49, in view of note 2 to section vi of the central excise tariff act, revenue alleged that appellant had recovered the amount of central excise duty from the customer .....

Shri Anand Patwardhan Vs. the Central Board of Film Certification and ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2003(3)ALLMR25; 2003(5)BomCR58; 2004(1)MhLj856

..... affect the freedom of speech and expression of the petitioner under article 19(1)(a) of the constitution. they go beyond the parameters prescribed under sub-section (1) of section 5b of the cinematograph act, 1952. accordingly, we allow this petition and set aside the impugned order passed by the fcat and direct the respondents to issue 'u' certificate ..... directed that the slogans be deleted. the second deletion is from a speech of a dalit leader bhai sangare. this shri sangare is seen giving a speech after explosion of the atomic device by india. the speech records anguish of the speaker on the device being exploded on the day of buddha jayanti. the speaker says that ..... bomb or the comment on the hindu gods will disrupt public order. in his submission, this is not something which is permissible even under sub-section (1) of section 5-b of the act which lays down the principles for guidance in certifying the films.13. as far as the addition is concerned, mr. sebastian submitted that this was .....

Star Chemicals (Bombay) Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in : (2003)79TTJ(Mum.)1002

..... not doubted by the ao. the nature of business is manufacture of phosphorous, which is highly explosive and it is claimed that the loader is a necessity in the line of trade. in accordance with the provisions of section 32ab of the it act, 1961, the deduction was allowed to the assessee on the purchase of jcb excavator loader but ..... section 32 of the act and as such the deduction be allowed under section 37 of the act as a matter of commercial expediency as a prudent businessman would do." 4. the learned counsel for the assessee argued ..... . 1 is not pressed by the learned counsel of the assessee, hence dismissed. "cit(a) erred in upholding the disallowance of rs. 8,66,989 under section 32ab of the it act in respect of unserviceable and unusable jcb excavator loader scrapped during the accounting year and the scrap value deducted from the block of assets under .....

Anil Chemicals and Indus. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in : (2003)(155)ELT91Tri(Mum.)bai

..... made for the extended period is hit by limitation. the following judgments witness this ruling - (1) the storage in three compartments of the ingredients necessary to manufacture prepared explosives in the same van did not amount to manufacture and that the provisions of rule 2(a) of the rules for interpretation of central excise tariff did not apply. ..... and could not fall under the ambit of the aforesaid rule. the belief of the commissioner that these three ingredients carried separately in the same van were prepared explosives incomplete or unprepared form has no substance and must be rejected.5. as the second argument before him the assessees claimed that the goods on final mixing at ..... to evade payment of duty. in the absence of any specific averment to this effect, the proviso to section 11a does not come into operation. no such allegation is made in the show cause notice at all. the act of not taking a licence is described as wilful but there is nothing to sustain the invocation of the .....

Mohammad GayasuddIn Son of Wali Mohammad Vs. the State of Maharashtra, ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2003BomCR(Cri)1727; 2003CriLJ2994

..... : 1) he intended to threaten the unity, integrity, security or sovereignty of india, 2) he intended to strike terror in the people, 3) any section of people does any act or thing by using bombs, dynamites or other explosive substances or inflammable substances or firearms or other lethal weapons or poisons or noxious gases or other chemicals or by any other substances (whether ..... ) whoever - (a) with intent to threaten the unity, integrity, security or sovereignty of india or to strike terror in the people or any section of the people does any act or thing by using bombs, dynamite or other explosive substances or inflammable substances or firearms or other lethal weapons or poisons or noxious gases or other chemicals or by any other substances (whether .....

Rajpal Shyamlal Soude Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2003BomCR(Cri)1033; 2003CriLJ4238

..... 427 read with 34 of the indian penal code and under section 25(1)(a) and 27 of the indian arms act read with section 34 of the indian penal code. they were also chargesheeted for offence punishable under section-4 and 5 of the explosive substance act read with section 34 of the indian penal code. the trial court however, ..... has convicted the appellant-accused no. 1 only for the offence punishable under section 307 read with 34 of the indian penal code and sentenced to ..... of those who in one way or the other facilitate the execution of the common design is itself tantamount to actual participation in the criminal act. the essence of section 34 is simultaneous consensus of the minds of persons participating in the criminal action to bring about a particular result. such consensus can be developed .....

Ghodavat Pan Masala Products Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

..... why - (i) central excise duty as detailed in annexure b-vii should not be demanded and recovered from them under the proviso to sub section (1) of section 11a of the act read with rule 9 (2) of the central excise rules 1944. (ii) why the goods seized as detailed in annexure "d" to the ..... & 10 should not be adjusted and appropriated towards the demand. (iv) penalty equivalent to the duty determined under section. 11a(2) of the said act should not be recovered under the provisions of section 11ab of the said act. (v) land, building, plant, machinery etc. used in connection with manufacture/production/storage/removal/disposal of the ..... materials used.clandestine removal burden on dept - sources of raw materials not contacted buyers not contacted receipt of sale proceeds not established.clandestine removal a positive act /provable on mere assumptions and ^1 presumptions.clandestine removal cannot be proved by office memo - not a direct evidence nits evidentiary value extremely limited.inflated .....

Commissioner of Customs and Vs. Swastik Dyeing and Bleaching

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in : (2004)(170)ELT491Tri(Mum.)bai

..... and thereafter, under notification no. 130/82-ce. the process of "calendaring", "stentering" & "squeezing of excess water" do not amount to "manufacture" as contemplated under section 2(f) of the act. consequently, there would be no liability to duty. in natwar textile processors pvt. ltd. v. cce, surat 2000 (120) elt 654 (tribunal), the cegat dealing ..... to the process of "stentering" carried on by the respondents on cotton fabrics and the same would also not amount to "manufacture" as envisaged under section 2(f) of the act. d) squeezing of excess water from the fabrics also does not amount to 'manufacture' in view of the principle laid down by the larger bench ..... with aid of power, admittedly with plain rollers. such process of "calendaring" has been held to be not amounting to "manufacture" within the meaning of section 2(f) of the act by the hon'ble supreme court vide judgments rendered in the case of siddeshwari cotton mills (p) ltd. v. uoi and anr.mafatlal spinning & manufacturing .....