Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: recent Year: 2003 Page 2 of about 4,629 results (0.157 seconds)

Securities and Exchange Board of India Vs. Sangeeta Jayesh Valia

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (2004)2CompLJ347(Bom); [2004]50SCL641(Bom)

..... ,50,000, in both the cases.7. the respondent therefore, preferred two appeals, before the securities appellate tribunal, mumbai, under section 29 read with section 15j of sebi act on 29-8-2000, against the above orders. the said appeals were contested by the present appellant. after hearing both the parties ..... speech or law case esp. for newspaper publication, house of commons debate on bill when reported periodical statement on public work. 3. sound of explosion.as per webster dictionary 1959 edition 'information 'means: 1. knowledge communicated or received concerning a particular fact or circumstance, news information concerning a crime ..... only) for violation of regulation 3(4), sebi (substantial acquisition of shares and takeover) regulations 1997 (for short takeover regulations, 1997) and section 15a(b) of sebi act, against the respondent, (original appellant), were set-aside. thereby appeals filed by the respondent herein, were allowed. therefore, the appellants herein (original .....

Indian Ammonium Nitrate Manufacturers Association and anr. Vs. Union o ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2004(1)ALD164; 2004(1)ALT306

..... tariff act. thus the imports of ammonium nitrate of explosive grade in bulk under the guise of fertilizer grade ammonium nitrate and its onward sales to the explosive industry is in clear breach of the restriction imposed by chapter vi of the said order and in particular section 19(a), (c)(iii), (vi) and section 25 ..... of respondent no. 5 also states that the chief controller of explosives, department of explosives, nagpur, by his letter dated 26.2.2003 clarified that the item ammonium nitrate is itself not an explosive and does not come under the purview of the explosive act and the rules administered by the department. the government of india ..... issued fertilizer control order, 1985 under essential commodities act, which contains specification of fertilizers sold in the country, method of .....

Ambuja Cement Rajasthan Ltd. and Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (2004)(91)ECC484

..... relevant rule governing input duty credit is rule 3 of the cenvat credit rules, 2001. the ground on which the credits taken by the appellants in these appeals on explosives under the said rule was disallowed by the lower appellate authority is that the said goods does not fit in the definition of "input" under clause (f) of ..... v. birla corporation ltd., 2002 (146) elt 215, this submission is not contested. in the cited cases, one of the issues considered by this bench was whether the explosives used by the respondents for mining limestone at sites outside their cement factory were eligible inputs for modvat purpose. in each of the two cases, the relevant period was april ..... therefore, apply to the instant cases as well.accordingly, these two appeals are also allowed.6. if any deposit made by any of these appellants under section 35-f of the central excise act is lying with the department, the same shall be refunded to them as early as possible, at any rate within a period of 30 days from the .....

Premier Explosives Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Reported in : (2004)(92)ECC312

..... pleaded that it is a well settled law that transportation charges from factory gate to depot and turnover tax are allowable deduction under section 4 of central excise act.6. shri l. narasimha murthy learned jdrappeared on behalf of the revenue. he pleaded that in these cases, the orders passed by ..... , they are being disposed of by this common order.3. the fact in brief are that m/s premier explosives ltd are manufacturers of prepared explosives. they clear the explosives manufactured by them by stock transfer to their depots and consignment agents on payment of duty on the basis of ..... commissioner (appeals) are liable to be set aside as the same are contrary to the provisions of section 4 of central excise act. in terms of section 4(2) of central excise act, 1944 where the price of excisable goods for delivery at the place of removal is not known and ..... 1. these are the four appeals filed by m/s premier explosives ltd. against order nos. 74/99 (h-iii) ce, 75/99 (h-iii) ce, 76/99 (h-iii) .....

State of Punjab and anr. Vs. Devans Modern Brewaries Ltd. and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT2003(10)SC485; 2003(10)SCALE202; (2004)11SCC26

..... trade. no doubt conditions restrictive of freedom of trade among the states will frequently involve a discrimination; but that is not essential or decisive. an act may contravene section 92 though it operates in restriction both of intra-state and of inter-state trade.'149. however, in india part xiii of the constitution relates both ..... but it would depend upon the nature of the mischief which is sought to be remedied. for the aforementioned purpose dealing in liquor, trading in dangerous goods as explosives, trafficking in women, toutism, essential commodities and realisation of tax have been placed in the same category. [see har shankar v. dy excise commer. of taxation ..... impermissible.81. a subsidiary question which arises for consideration is as to whether the state of punjab, having regard to section 33a of the punjab act, could levy such duty. in sub-section (1) of section 33a provision has been made permitting the state to continue to levy any duty which it had lawfully been levying .....

Sambhu Kumar Singh and anr. Vs. State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand)

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2004(1)JCR691(Jhr)]

..... per the seizure list (ext. 4) in presence of the witnesses.4. charge was framed against the appellants under sections 25(1-b) and 26 of the arms act and also under section 5 of the explosive substance act.5. the appellants have pleaded not guilty to the charges levelled against them and they claim themselves to be innocent ..... rigorous imprisonment for a period of five years for the offence under section 26(2) of the said act and the sentences were ordered to run concurrently. however, both the appellants were not found guilty of the offence under section 5 of the explosive substance act and they were accordingly acquitted in respect thereof.2. the prosecution case ..... 1992 by shri dilip kumar sinha, 2nd additional sessions judge, hazaribagh whereby and whereunder the appellants were found guilty for the offence punishable under sections 25(1)(c) and 26(2) of the arms act, 1959 and they were convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for five years for the offence punishable under .....

Sanjay V. Modi and Ajanta Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (2004)(93)ECC24

..... to official records and entries therein are entered on the basis of certain internal documents and that too with the full knowledge of the management; that as per section 36a of the central excise act, the contents of any document seized from the custody or control of any person shall be presumed to be true unless the contrary is proved. he emphasized ..... of fabric was sent with the price-list for the purpose of valuation and the same had nothing to do with the classification. he relied upon the decision in rajasthan explosives & chemicals ltd. v. cce, jaipur, 2003 (85) ecc 85 (t) wherein the tribunal has held that "if there are documents for the clearance of excisable goods without payment of duty .....

Fertiliser Corporation of India Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : II(2004)ACC108; AIR2004P& H162; (2004)136PLR440

..... i.e., railway risk rate, then the railway administration is liable for the loss or damage caused to the same during the course of transit.15. section 78 of the act pertains to exoneration from responsibility in certain cases, which reads as under:-78. exoneration from responsibility in certain cases.- notwithstanding anything contained in the foregoing ..... or the consignee;g) natural deterioration or wastage in bulk or weight due to inherent defect, quality or vice of the goods;h) latent defects;i) fire, explosion or any unforeseen risk;provided that even where such loss, destruction, damage, deterioration or non-delivery is proved to have arisen from any one or more of ..... the state of despatch. in view of the aforesaid judgments, i am of the opinion that the railway administration was not entitled for any benefit under section 74 of the act.21. in view of the aforesaid discussion, the instant appeal is allowed with costs. the impugned judgment and decree passed by the learned trial court is .....

Oriental Insurance Co. Limited Vs. Bhatter Silver Smith Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

..... briefly stated, are that the respondent m/s. bhatter silver smith pvt. ltd. through its director shri roshan dabriwal, had filed a complaint under section 12 of the act before the district forum, averring therein that the respondent was engaged in the business of fabrication of silver jewellery and a jewellers block insurance policy bearing no ..... no. 17-a/39, vardan house, ajmal khan road, karol bagh, new delhi. it was stated that the policy issued by the appellant covered risk against fire, explosion, lightening, riot, strike, malicious damage, burglary, house-breaking, theft and robbery. it was stated that despite all round security, on the night falling between 10th/11th may ..... in service and on the basis of above finding has passed the impugned order. 8. feeling aggrieved, the appellant has preferred the present appeal under section 15 of the act. 9. we have heard the learned counsel for the appellant at length and have also carefully gone through the documents/material on record. on the .....

Ramanand Yadav Vs. Prabhu Nath Jha and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2003(3)BLJR2330; 2004CriLJ640; JT2003(8)SC404; (2003)12SCC606

..... two of them namely laxmi yadav and badri yadav were found guilty of offence under section 3 of the explosive substance act, 1908 (in short 'explosive act'). life sentence was imposed by offences relatable to section 302 or section 302 read with section 149. custodial sentence of various magnitudes were imposed for other offences. since prabhu nath was absconding, his trial was separated ..... of occurrence immediately after the 'explosion and, therefore, the fact that they did not see the eye-witnesses cannot be a factor to doubt their presence. so far as the medical evidence is concerned ..... of pws 2 and 4 ruling out presence of so-called eye witnesses is concerned it was pointed out that the witnesses have clearly stated that after the explosion they went away being afraid and shocked, and came back after a short time. the evidence of pws 2 and 4 shows that they reached, the spot .....