Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: recent Court: us supreme court Year: 2006 Page 6 of about 69 results (0.434 seconds)

State of Tamil Nadu and anr. Vs. P. Krishnamurthy and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC1622; JT2006(4)SC167; (2006)3MLJ313(SC); 2006(3)SCALE460; (2006)4SCC517

..... extended nor be renewed. rule 15 provides for absolute prohibition or regulation of quarrying or removal of sand from riverbeds to which madras river conservancy act, 1884 has been extended and for regulating the quarrying or removal of sand from beds of river in charge of the public works department. the form ..... it is submitted that termination of all leases/permissions relating to quarrying of sand, as a class, under rule 38a, is a legislative act and not an executive act and therefore, section 4a(3) has application. it is submitted that rule 38a being a delegated legislation, legislative in character, is not open to question ..... minerals, and empowering central/state government to reserve areas for mining operation by government companies/corporations, specifically exclude areas already held under mining leases. even, section 17 while referring to the power of the central government to undertake mining operations exclusively in any area, excludes areas already held under mining leases. it .....

Georgia Vs. Randolph

Court : US Supreme Court

..... for consent to search, which she readily gave. she led the officer upstairs to a bedroom that she identified as scott s, where the sergeant noticed a section of a drinking straw with a powdery residue he suspected was cocaine. he then left the house to get an evidence bag from his car and to call ..... the fourth and fourteenth amendments to discourage citizens from aiding to the utmost of their ability in the apprehension of criminals. id., at 488. because the police were acting normally and properly when they asked about any guns, and questioning mrs. coolidge about the clothing was logical and in no way coercive, the fourth amendment did not ..... his privacy with respect to his roommate by saving the software on their shared computer. a wide variety of often subtle social conventions may shape expectations about how we act when another shares with us what is otherwise private, and those conventions go by a variety of labels courtesy, good manners, custom, protocol, even honor among thieves. .....

Mahabir Vegetable Oils Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Haryana and ors ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT2006(3)SC544; (2006)143PLR159; 2006(3)SCALE178; (2006)3SCC620; [2006]145STC350(SC)

..... 2 ch. 1]. a retrospective effect to an amendment by way of a delegated legislation could be given, thus, only after coming into force of sub-section (2a) of section 64 of the act and not prior thereto.35. by reason of note 2, certain rights were conferred. although there lies a distinction between vested rights and accrued rights as by ..... dates. furthermore, on 6.09.1996, civil construction work started at site. plans submitted by the appellant for getting permission for storage of hexane were sanctioned by the explosives department on 19.9.1996 and licence was finally given on 11.3.1997. on 26.09.1996, process of installation of the plant started at the site. on ..... a promise. it was held:in this case the scheme being notified under the power in the state government to grant exemptions both under section 15 of the rst act and section 8(5) of the cst act in the public interest, the state government was competent to modify or revoke the grant for the same reason. thus what is granted .....

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC1383; (2006)4CompLJ330(SC); (2006)201CTR(SC)346; [2006]282ITR273(SC); JT2006(3)SC114; 2006(2)SCALE752; (2006)3SCC1; [2006]145STC91(SC); 2006[2]STR161; [2006]152

..... to use goods.24. gannon dunkerly declared that a transaction of sale of goods has to be under a contract i.e. it is consensual.25. section 4 of the telegraph act maintains the integrity of subject-matter of the licence viz, 'establish, maintain or work a telegraph'. therefore, the transaction of service is composite one not ..... casing, coating, tube or pipe enclosing the same, and any appliances and apparatus connected therewith for the purpose of fixing or insulating the same.58. section 4 of the 1885 act gives exclusive privilege in respect of telecommunication and the power to grant licences to the central government. pursuant to such power, licences have been granted to ..... regarding the first of such objections that the writ petitions have become infructuous - it may be true that in relation to the u.p. trade tax act, 1948, the challenge to section 2(h) and 3f which have basically re-produced article 366(29a) has not been pressed by the petitioners. what has been argued however, is for .....

Scheidler Vs. National Organization for Women, Inc.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... 848 , 854 (2000) (holding that by using the term affecting commerce, congress did not define the crime described in [18 u. s. c.] 844(i) as the explosion of a building whose damage or destruction might affect interstate commerce, and noting that the court must look to other qualifying language in the provision to define the offense). for ..... second question requires an entry of judgment in petitioners favor, we shall not answer the first or third questions. ii we first set forth the hobbs act s text. the relevant statutory section imposes criminal liability on [w]hoever in any way or degree obstructs, delays, or affects commerce or the movement of any article or commodity in ..... the reference in the physical violence clause to actions or threats of violence in furtherance of a plan or purpose to do anything in violation of this section seems to mean acts or threats of violence in furtherance of a plan or purpose to engage in robbery or extortion , for that is the only kind of behavior that .....

M.P. Housing Board and anr. Vs. Manoj Shrivastava

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC3499; 101(2006)CLT580(SC); [2006(109)FLR194]; JT2006(3)SC73; (2006)IILLJ119SC; 2006(2)SCALE572; (2006)2SCC702; 2006(2)SLJ464(SC)

..... to the respondent. he thereafter filed an application before the labour court purported to be in terms of section 31(3) read with section 64-a of the madhya pradesh industrial relations act, 1960 (for short 'the 1960 act') praying that he be classified in the permanent category on the ground that he had satisfactorily worked for ..... , which is a 'state' within the meaning of article 12 of the constitution of india, upon compliance of the constitutional requirements as also the provisions of the 1972 act or the rules and regulations framed thereunder.12. in mahendra l. jain and ors. v. indore development authority and ors. : (2005)illj578sc , this court followed ..... obligation shall also be void. if no appointment could be made in terms of the statute, such appointment being not within the purview of the provisions of the act would be void; he cannot be brought within the cadre of permanent employees. the definitions of 'permanent employee' and 'temporary employee' as contained in the rules .....

The Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board Vs. Subhash Chand and a ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC1263; JT2006(3)SC393; (2006)IILLJ241SC; 2006(2)SCALE614; (2006)2SCC794; 2006(3)SLJ87(SC)

..... person means his personal legal condition only so far as his personal rights and burdens are concerned. dugganna v. ganeshayya : air1965kant97 , 101. [indian evidence act (1 of 1872), section 41]in the language of jurisprudence status is a condition of membership of a group of which powers and duties are exclusively determined by law and not ..... held that having regard to the nature of termination of services it would not come within the purview of the said definition, the question of applicability of section 25g of the act does not arise.12. in state of u.p. v. neeraj awasthi and ors. : (2006)illj721sc wherein this court upon taking into consideration the ..... with entire wages and thus this court should not exercise its discretionary jurisdiction under article 136 of the constitution of india. 'retrenchment' has been defined in section 2(oo) of the act to mean:.2(oo) 'retrenchment' means the termination by the employer of the service of a workman for any reason whatsoever, otherwise than as a .....

Arbaugh Vs. Y and H Corp.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... a person . 2000e(b).[ footnote 1 ] this employee-numerosity requirement[ footnote 2 ] appears in a section headed definitions, 2000e, which also prescribes the meaning, for title vii purposes, of 12 other terms used in the act.[ footnote 3 ] congress has broadly authorized the federal courts to exercise subject-matter jurisdiction over all civil ..... s., at 247.[ footnote 9 ] the basic statutory grants of federal-court subject-matter jurisdiction are contained in 28 u. s. c. 1331 and 1332. section 1331 provides for [f]ederal-question jurisdiction, 1332 for [d]iversity of citizenship jurisdiction. a plaintiff properly invokes 1331 jurisdiction when she pleads a colorable claim ..... vii contains a separate jurisdictional provision, 42 u. s. c. 2000e 6(b), authorizing suits by the government to enjoin pattern or practice discrimination. footnote 5 section 1367(a) states: except as provided in subsections (b) and (c) or as expressly provided otherwise by federal statute, in any civil action of which .....

Dolan Vs. Postal Service

Court : US Supreme Court

..... shall apply to tort claims arising out of activities of the postal service, 409(c). the ftca, in turn, waives sovereign immunity in two different sections of the united states code. the first confers federal-court jurisdiction in a defined category of cases involving negligence committed by federal employees in the course of ..... which the government claims relates only circumstantially to the mail, and dolan s accident, which was caused by the mail itself. in both cases the postal employee acts negligently while transmitting mail. in addition, focusing on whether the mail itself caused the injury would yield anomalies, perhaps making liability turn on , e.g., ..... the question is whether 2860(b) s exception preserves sovereign immunity in such a case. considered in isolation, negligent transmission could embrace a wide range of acts. however, interpretation of a word or phrase depends upon reading the whole statutory text, considering the statute s purpose and context. here, both context and .....

M.C. Mehta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC1325; 127(2006)DLT226; JT2006(2)SC448; 2006(2)SCALE364; (2006)3SCC399

..... the work to which the order relates to be demolished and the expenses of such demolition shall be recoverable from such person as an arrear of tax under this act.section 344 - order of stoppage of buildings or works in certain cases.--(1) where the erection of any building or execution of any work has been commenced or ..... premises. on the other hand, if misuser does not come within the ambit of 'unauthorised development', the power of sealing would be lacking. section 31a of the delhi development act reads as under:section 31a power to seal unauthorised development.--(1) it shall be lawful for the authority or the competent authority, as the case may be, at ..... with immunity and claim any right to use a building for a purpose other than authorised. further, the words 'unless the context otherwise requires' in section 331 of the dmc act are of no consequence for determining the point in issue as the context herein does not provide otherwise for the present purposes. it does not provide that .....