Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Court: us supreme court Year: 2006 Page 1 of about 69 results (0.092 seconds)

Scheidler Vs. National Organization for Women, Inc.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... 848 , 854 (2000) (holding that by using the term affecting commerce, congress did not define the crime described in [18 u. s. c.] 844(i) as the explosion of a building whose damage or destruction might affect interstate commerce, and noting that the court must look to other qualifying language in the provision to define the offense). for ..... second question requires an entry of judgment in petitioners favor, we shall not answer the first or third questions. ii we first set forth the hobbs act s text. the relevant statutory section imposes criminal liability on [w]hoever in any way or degree obstructs, delays, or affects commerce or the movement of any article or commodity in ..... the reference in the physical violence clause to actions or threats of violence in furtherance of a plan or purpose to do anything in violation of this section seems to mean acts or threats of violence in furtherance of a plan or purpose to engage in robbery or extortion , for that is the only kind of behavior that .....

State of Tamil Nadu and anr. Vs. P. Krishnamurthy and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC1622; JT2006(4)SC167; (2006)3MLJ313(SC); 2006(3)SCALE460; (2006)4SCC517

..... extended nor be renewed. rule 15 provides for absolute prohibition or regulation of quarrying or removal of sand from riverbeds to which madras river conservancy act, 1884 has been extended and for regulating the quarrying or removal of sand from beds of river in charge of the public works department. the form ..... it is submitted that termination of all leases/permissions relating to quarrying of sand, as a class, under rule 38a, is a legislative act and not an executive act and therefore, section 4a(3) has application. it is submitted that rule 38a being a delegated legislation, legislative in character, is not open to question ..... minerals, and empowering central/state government to reserve areas for mining operation by government companies/corporations, specifically exclude areas already held under mining leases. even, section 17 while referring to the power of the central government to undertake mining operations exclusively in any area, excludes areas already held under mining leases. it .....

Daulat Singh Surana and ors. Vs. First Land Acquisition Collector and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2007SC471; 2007(2)ALD1(SC); 2007(1)AWC524(SC); [2008(2)JCR55(SC)]; JT2007(1)SC24; 2006(11)SCALE482; 2006AIRSCW5879; 2007(1)SCC641

..... rent to which he was entitled in law in appropriate proceedings. the appellant has failed to point out any infirmity as far as notification under section 4 and consequent declaration under section 6 of the act. section 4 of the notification is usually assailed on the ground of public purpose. therefore, we deem it appropriate to enumerate the concept of public ..... and partly at the expense of within the aforesaid ward of the calcutta municipal corporation in the city of calcutta.this declaration is made under the provision of section 6 of act 1 of 1894/read with the said notification, to all whom it may concern.a plan of the land may be inspected in the office of the ..... public purpose at the public expense within the aforesaid ward of the calcutta municipal corporation in the city of calcutta.this notification is made, under the provisions of section 4 of act i of 1894 to all whom it may concern.a plan of the land may be inspected in the office of the first land acquisition officer, calcutta, .....

P. Narayanappa and anr. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC3001; JT2006(8)SC185; 2006(8)SCALE199

..... is whether the land is acquired for development by the board or for any other purpose in furtherance of the objects of the act, as mentioned in sub-section (1) of section 28 of the act. in fact, if the contention raised by the learned senior counsel for the appellants is accepted, it would mean that even ..... the land can be acquired for (i) development by the board; or (ii) for any other purpose in furtherance of the objects of the act. under sub-section (8) of section 28, the state government is empowered, after it has taken possession of land, to transfer the same to the board for the purpose for which ..... /engineering college, research and development center, educational center, commercial and residential buildings and service apartments, convention center, hotel, shopping mall, etc. in the notification under section 28(1) of the act, the purpose of acquisition, namely, the purpose for which the company, vikas telecom (p) ltd. wanted the land, as enumerated above, was not mentioned and .....

Sunrise Associates Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC1908; 2006(5)ALD51(SC); 129(2006)DLT719(SC); [2007(1)JCR110(SC)]; JT2006(5)SC168; 2006(2)KLT700(SC); RLW2006(3)SC2129; 2006(5)SCALE1; (2006)5SCC603; [2006]145STC57

..... of sale.all these definitions exclude inter alia an actionable claim from the definition of 'goods'. an 'actionable claim' has in turn been defined in section 3 of the transfer of property act, 1882 as meaning;a claim to any debt, other than a debt secured by mortgage of immoveable property or by hypothecation or pledge of moveable property, ..... rem were also included within the meaning of moveable property. the court rejected the argument that rep licenses were actionable claims within the meaning of section 3 of the transfer of property act and said:when these licenses scrips are being bought and sold freely in the market as goods and when they have a value of their own ..... of an actionable claim would not be subject to the sales tax laws.21. distinct elements are deducible from the definition of 'actionable claim' in section 3 of the transfer of property act. an actionable claim is of course as its nomenclature suggests, only a claim. a claim might connote a demand, but in the context of the .....

Southern Petrochemicals Industries Corporation Ltd. Vs. Administrator ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2007SC533; II(2007)BC83; [2007]135CompCas474(SC); 2007(1)CTC425; (2007)2SCC282; [2007]75SCL467(SC); 2007AIRSCW83; 2007LawHerald(SC)78; 2007(3)KCCRSN104; 2007(2)AIRKarR39; JT2007(1)SC372

..... rights etc. of the erstwhile unit trust of india. the initial capital of the trust stood transferred to and vested in the central government under section 3(1) of the act. sub-section (2) however, mandated that the initial capital contributed by the named contributors shall be refunded by the central government to such extent as may be ..... appointed day, the jurisdiction, powers and authority to entertain appeals against any order made, or deemed to have been made, by a tribunal under this act. sub-sections (1) and (2) of section 19 are also relevant. they read as under:19. application to the tribunal. - (1) where a bank is a financial institution has to recover ..... of the central government, that is immaterial because the administrator and the specified company are deemed to be 'financial institutions' by reason of section 18 of the act read with section 4a of the companies act. in any event, in this case, the facts are quite clear and respondents 1 and 2 have sued for recovery of amounts due .....

Ravinder Singh Gorkhi Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC2157; 2006CriLJ2791; 130(2006)DLT602(SC); JT2006(5)SC468; 2006(5)SCALE682; (2006)5SCC584

..... placed by mr. mishra on bhoop ram v. state of u.p. : 1990crilj2671 , wherein the appellant was treated to be a child within the meaning of section 2(4) of the act; upon taking into consideration three factors: (i) that the appellant had produced a school certificate and correctness whereof was not questioned; (ii) the learned trial judge ..... was upon the election petitioner but for proving the facts which were within the special knowledge of the respondent, the burden was upon him in terms of section 106 of the evidence act. it is also trite that when both parties have adduced evidence, the question of the onus of proof becomes academic [see union of india v. sugauli ..... basis of the materials on records. it will be a matter of appreciation of evidence adduced by the parties. different standards having regard to the provision of section 35 of the evidence act cannot be applied in a civil case or a criminal case. mr. mishra, however, would urge that while in a civil dispute a strict proof may .....

Pandey and Co. Builders Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Bihar and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2007SC465; 2007(1)ALLMR(SC)897; 2006(4)ARBLR192(SC); 2007(1)AWC837(SC); JT2006(10)SC414; 2006(11)SCALE665; (2007)1SCC467; 2007(2)CivilLJ783(SC); 2007(1)LawHerald(SC)1752; 2006AIRSCW5871

..... anr. : air2006sc450 but the same does not take away the effect of the appellate jurisdiction to be exercised by a court under sub-section (2) of section 37 of the 1996 act.section 42 of the 1996 act refers to applications and not to appeals. 14. reliance placed by the learned counsel on guru nanak foundation v. rattan singh and sons ..... words 'under those circumstances. 18. there exists a distinction between an appeal and an application. whereas section 31(4) of the 1940 act or section 42 of the 1996 act provides for an application, sub-section (2) of section 37 of the 1996 act provides for a statutory appeal. a forum of an appellate court must be determined with reference to ..... inasmuch as the word defined is said to mean a certain thing, it is possible for the word to have a somewhat different meaning in different sections of the act depending upon the subject or context. that is why all definitions in statutes generally begin with the qualifying words, similar to the words used in the .....

The State Rep. by Inspector of Police, Pudukottai, Tamil Nadu Vs. A. P ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2007SC51; 2006CriLJ4772; [2007(2)JCR54(SC)]; JT2006(12)SC590; 2007(1)MPHT1; 2007(1)OLR(SC)143; 2006(10)SCALE62; (2006)11SCC473

..... construed as references to the definition of 'owner' in clause (1) of section 2 of the mines act, 1952, which repealed and re-enacted 1923 act. consequently, the references to section 562 of old code in section 19 of the probation act and to section 5(2) of the old act in section 18 of the probation act, respectively have to be inevitably read as references to their corresponding provisions ..... be notification in the official gazette appoint. in state of tamil nadu it came into force in the entire state in the year 1964. section 19 of that act lays down that, subject to the provisions of section 18, section 562 of the criminal procedure code, 1898 (hereinafter referred to as 'old code') shall cease to apply to the states or parts in which the probation .....

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC1383; (2006)4CompLJ330(SC); (2006)201CTR(SC)346; [2006]282ITR273(SC); JT2006(3)SC114; 2006(2)SCALE752; (2006)3SCC1; [2006]145STC91(SC); 2006[2]STR161; [2006]152

..... to use goods.24. gannon dunkerly declared that a transaction of sale of goods has to be under a contract i.e. it is consensual.25. section 4 of the telegraph act maintains the integrity of subject-matter of the licence viz, 'establish, maintain or work a telegraph'. therefore, the transaction of service is composite one not ..... casing, coating, tube or pipe enclosing the same, and any appliances and apparatus connected therewith for the purpose of fixing or insulating the same.58. section 4 of the 1885 act gives exclusive privilege in respect of telecommunication and the power to grant licences to the central government. pursuant to such power, licences have been granted to ..... regarding the first of such objections that the writ petitions have become infructuous - it may be true that in relation to the u.p. trade tax act, 1948, the challenge to section 2(h) and 3f which have basically re-produced article 366(29a) has not been pressed by the petitioners. what has been argued however, is for .....