Court : Patna
..... incident is of 1997. it occurred in a public transport bus when that bus was carrying passengers and stopped at a bus-stand. the moment the bus stopped an explosion took place inside the bus that ultimately resulted in death of four persons and injury to twenty-four persons. the nature of the incident and the circumstances in which ..... about the very grave nature of offence. as a matter of fact, the appellant has been charged for the offences under sections 302/307 ipc and section 3 and, in the alternative, section 4(b) of the es act. it is true that the appellant has been in jail since 9-3-1998 and it is more than 14 years since ..... intention, and (ii) participation of the accused in the commission of an offence. it further makes clear that if common intention is proved but no overt act is attributed to the individual accused, section 34 will be attracted as essentially it involves vicarious liability but if participation of the accused in the crime is proved and common intention is absent .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Patna
..... of endangering human life or causing danger to any property. the other most important aspect of the application of the provisions of sections 3 and 4 of the act is that the act of detonating an explosion has to be with a particular purpose, that is to say, that it should be with a purpose which is unlawful and ..... 1. three appellants were charged by the learned 3rd additional sessions judge, aurangabad with commission of offences under sections 3 and 4 of the explosive substances act (hereinafter referred to as the act) in sessions trial no. 42 of 1993 and by judgment of conviction dated 15.02.2002 they were held guilty of committing the offences. after ..... mens rea), preparation, attempt and commission of the act, but by formulating the provisions of sections 3 and 4 of the act, the legislature appears laying down one of the unknown criminal behaviour of a person, like, the purpose with which he was to commit the act of detonating an explosion and was laying it down as the most important .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Patna
..... when one could have considered the provisions of section 436 of the ipc, one might have found that mischief by fire or explosive substance could be an offence only when the intention is to destroy any building or the act of arson is perpetrated with knowledge that the act was likely to cause destruction of the building which ..... that particular fact indicating the commission of the act by any particular accused. the intention and knowledge being absent as appears definitely from the evidence, the conviction of appellant sito mehta under section 436 of the ipc appears completely out of the four walls of the provisions of section 436 of the ipc. the facts and the ..... that case, it could not be an offence under section 436 of the ipc. the dominant intention, as rightly pointed out by the learned public prosecutor, was to take forcible possession of the property. witnesses also stated that the accused persons were determined and did acts only in that direction. the statements of witnesses which .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Patna
..... 1994 acquitting the opposite party nos.2 to 6 from the charges framed against them for an offence punishable under section 307, 149 and 452 of the indian penal code, section 4/5 of the explosive substance act has challenged the same under instant revision petition.2. while assailing the judgment impugned, it has been submitted that ..... occurrence discredit their testimony and on account thereof became untrustworthy, unreliable.16. with regard to application of explosive substance act, it is apparent that none of the pws have stated that bomb had exploded and they have seen explosion thereof. informant himself is not static on this score. pw-1 himself shown his absence by having at ..... the nephew of informant against bhuneshwar shukla.8. the aforesaid complaint was sent to the local police for registration and investigation of the case in terms of section 156(3) cr.p.c. on the basis of which dariyapur p.s. case no.102 of 1992 was registered whereupon investigation commenced and concluded by .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Patna
..... .p. for the state. it is a case of misuse of privilege of bail. the petitioner is an accused in a case registered under section 147 of the indian penal code and sections 3 / 5 of the explosive substance act. petitioners prayer for bail has earlier been rejected vide order dated 21.09.2011 passed in cr. misc. no. 25447 of 2011 as contained .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Patna
..... kumar singh 24. 01-2012 heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the state. the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under sections 338/34 of the indian penal code and of the explosive substances act. it is alleged that due to mining operation being done by the petitioner, the informant received some injuries by stone. it is submitted that ..... .10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned c.j.m. aurangabad, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the code of criminal procedure. (dinesh kumar singh, j.) u.k./-
Tag this Judgment!Court : Patna
..... of the truck were apprehended. explosive substances kept in gunny bags were found concealed under the stone chips. it is submitted by learned ..... mr. justice dinesh kumar singh 24. 01-2012 petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences under sections 121(a), 122, 414, 120b/34 of the i.p.c. and section 17 of the criminal law amendment act. according to the prosecution case stone chips loaded truck was seized by the informant and five persons sitting in the cabin .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Patna
..... state. the petitioner is languishing in custody since 09.09.2011 in a case registered for the offence under sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 307, 384, 427, 448, 504,506 of the indian penal code, 27 of the arms act and of the explosive substances act. patna high court cr.misc. no.3012 of 2012 (2) dt.23-01-2012 the accusation of firing .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Patna
..... for the petitioner. 2012 no one appears for the state. this is a petition for grant of regular bail for offence under sections 307/34 of the penal code, 27 of the arms act and 3 and 4 of the explosive substances act. the petitioner has not been named in the first information report. from the order of the sessions judge, fast track court .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Patna
..... (chandpur o.p.) p.s.case no.236 of 2011 (g.r.no.4395 of 2011) for the offences punishable under sections 147, 148, 149, 380, 504, 452 of the indian penal code and section 3/4/5 of the explosive substance act. the allegation against the petitioners and some others is of entering into the fair price shop belonging to the father of ..... omnibus in nature, the f.i.r has patna high court cr.misc. no.44421 of 2011 (2) dt.23-01-2012 2 been instituted by the son for the act committed in the fair price shop of which his father holds licence and who has not filed any case. she further submits that the case in question is a retaliatory .....
Tag this Judgment!