Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: recent Court: kerala Year: 2006 Page 13 of about 172 results (0.537 seconds)

Mar 29 2006 (HC)

CochIn Mazdoor Sangh Vs. Bobby

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Mar-29-2006

Reported in : [2006(110)FLR926]; 2006(3)KLT317; (2006)IIILLJ702Ker

..... 14 of the constitution of india cannot hold good. the said finding appears to have come about from the provisions of the statute and in particular, section 3(3) of act ii of 1948 which, in terms, permits fixation of different minimum rates of wages in different localities. the fixation of different minimum rates of wages in ..... of the workmen employed in the business in order to ensure the sustenance of the workmen and their family. learned counsel also urged before us that section 3 of the act enables the state to fix minimum wages in cinema theatres irrespective of rural and urban classification.6. we have heard learned counsel for the parties and ..... to be issued, petitioner placed objections before the respondents questioning the validity of the same. the notification, ext.p1, issued by the government under section 9 of the minimum wages act revising/fixing the minimum wages of the employees engaged in the cinema theatres in the state of kerala was challenged/on the same grounds as urged .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 29 2006 (HC)

Malabar Cement Ltd. Vs. Secretary, Mcl Labour Union

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Mar-29-2006

Reported in : 2006(2)KLT965

..... a question arose whether the high court would not fall within the term 'authority' and the remedy of the appellant lies in seeking a reference under section 10 of the industrial disputes act, in the light of any dispute which arose, in regard to the number of years they have worked. this was found to be a disputed ..... . chief commercial supdt. 1988 (1) klt sn 14 case no. 28 a division bench of this court held that after notification is issued under section 10 of the contract labour (regulation & abolition) act, 1970, the displaced persons do not get any statutory right for absorption in regular service of their employment. in pankaj gupta and ors. v. ..... . the workers placed reliance on the following paragraphs:125(6): if the contract is found to be genuine and prohibition notification under section 10(1) of the clra act in respect of the establishment concerned has been issued by the appropriate government, prohibiting employment of contract labour in any process, operation or other work .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 28 2006 (HC)

Karim Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Mar-28-2006

Reported in : 2006(2)KLT874

..... of the law by the supreme court in state of tamil nadu v. paramasiva pandian : 2001crilj4772 . special court for trial of e.c. act came into existence as provided under section 12(9) of e.c. act. the act was enforced initially for five years and was later extended for a further period of five years from 1987 to 1992 and again extended ..... that exactly is the position herein. as special judge had no jurisdiction to try or convict appellants for the offences under e.c. act after 31/8/1997 the trial and conviction are void as provided under section 461 of cr.p.c.6. if the trial itself is void consequence will be that the accused are not tried for the ..... magistrate of the first class had no jurisdiction tried an offence under sub-section 1 of section 15 of u.p. private forests act, 1948 and convicted him. apex court held that previsions of cr.p.c with provisions of section 15 of forest act clearly show that offences under section 15 are not triable by any magistrate in view of the clear words .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 27 2006 (HC)

Noushad Vs. Kayamkulam Municipality

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Mar-27-2006

Reported in : 2006(2)KLT319

..... for abkari shops and can collect licence fee etc. in order to appreciate the rival contentions the provisions that existed prior to deletion of sub-sections 6 to 8 to section 447 by act 14/1999 have to be referred to. for easy reference, the provisions are extracted herein-below:447(1). purpose for which places may ..... 1st respondent-municipality from interfering with his toddy business. on the face of it, i find that the suit is not maintainable by virtue of section 563 of the municipality act, which is as follows:563. jurisdiction of civil courts barred: no civil court shall have jurisdiction to entertain any suit, application or petition challenging ..... advance permission in writing from the municipality is no longer required, the abkari licencee is bound to take out licence for running abkari shop under section 447(1) of the act, and the municipality is entitled to collect licence fee in accordance with the rules prescribed. counsel for municipality submitted that since no rules are made .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 24 2006 (HC)

Parthakumar Vs. Ajith Viswanathan

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Mar-24-2006

Reported in : 2006(4)CTC353; 2006(2)KLT250

..... of the powers of the special tribunals (the rent control court/ the appellate authority). this is the rationale underlying to the second proviso to section 11(1) of the act. the legislature wanted such disputes regarding title/claim of permanent tenancy to be considered only by the regular civil courts which follow exhaustive procedure and ..... therefore felt that only bonafide denial of title or a bonafide claim for permanent tenancy should alone divest the special tribunals of their jurisdiction under section 11 of the act. it is hence stipulated that the denial of title/claim for permanent tenancy must be bonafide. the tribunal's jurisdiction is only to decide whether ..... thereby admits the landlord's right to claim eviction and therefore there could possibly be no denial of title relevant to the second proviso to section 11(3) of the act. if the landlord - tenant relationship between the petitioner/claimant and the respondent/opposite party is admitted, there could possibly be no denial of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 24 2006 (HC)

Partha Kumar Vs. Ajith Viswanathan

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Mar-24-2006

Reported in : [2007(1)JCR175(NULL)]

..... he thereby admits the landlord's right to claim eviction and therefore there could possibly be no denial of title relevant to the second proviso to section 11 (3) of the act. if the landlord-tenant relationship between the petitioner/ claimant and the respondent/opposite party is admitted, there could possibly be no denial of title ..... of the powers of the special tribunals (the rent control court/the appellate authority). this is the rationale underlying to the second proviso to section 11(1) of the act. the legislature wanted such disputes regarding title/claim of permanent tenancy to be considered only be the regular civil courts which follow exhaustive procedure and ..... the property were acquired directly by the transferee landlords under ext. a-11.5. venugopalan-the original landlord claimed eviction against the tenant- sivananthan under section 11 (2) of the act in r.c.p. no. 67/95. later, the transferee landlords got themselves impleaded as supplemental landlords 2 to 4 in that r.c.p .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 24 2006 (HC)

Padmanabhan Vs. Corporation of Thiruvananthapuram

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Mar-24-2006

Reported in : AIR2006Ker258; 2006(2)KLT603

..... by making the levy permissible on each 'price for admission'. the changes made by the amending act of 1975 to section 5 and section 6(1) of the act were also to give effect to the aforesaid amendment brought to section 3. by such amendment, the admission of a person for the entertainment became subject of the condition ..... to which a higher payment is required.6. sub-sections (7) and (7a) as above were brought into the act by substitution, of sub-section (7) of section 2, as it earlier stood, by the amendment of 1975. section 3 of the act before the amendment of 1975 read with section 2(7) as it then stood, provided for levy ..... coming into force of the kerala local authorities entertainments tax (amendment) act, 1975 but before the coming into force of the kerala local authorities entertainments tax (amendment) act 16 of 2000.4. before its amendment in 1975, the charging section, namely, section 3 of the act provided for levy of entertainments tax on each 'payment for admission' to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 22 2006 (HC)

Balasubramanian Vs. Chandradas

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Mar-22-2006

Reported in : 2006(2)KLT467

..... bharatheeya janatha party while 16 were elected under the united democratic front. they have to make and subscribe oath and affirmation as provided under section 143 (1) of the act. section 143 in its entirely is extracted hereunder for easy reference.143. oath or affirmation.-(1) the government, after each general election shall ..... vijayakumar and hence he was declared elected as chairperson by the returning officer. chandrankutty had to make and subscribe oath or affirmation under section 143 (2) of the act before the returning officer, a person nominated by the government for that purpose. chandrankutty however refused to make oath or affirmation as chairperson ..... , counsel appearing for the state election commission submitted that the returning officer is a person before whom in exercise of the powers under section 143 (2) of the act the chairperson has to make and subscribe his oath. in the absence of chairperson election commission permitted the deputy chairperson to make and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 21 2006 (HC)

Bar Council of India Vs. Mary Tresa

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Mar-21-2006

Reported in : 2006(2)KLT210

..... they may be relevant to answer the question posed in the very beginning of the judgment. any person who may fulfil the conditions mentioned in section 24 of the advocates act, 1961, hereinafter referred to as the 'act of 1961' would be qualified to be admitted as an advocate on a state roll. such person has to be a citizen of india, ..... further that none of them has any disqualification that may come in their way of enrolment as advocate as mentioned in section 24a of the act of 1961. the bar council of kerala deriving authority from sub-section (1) of section 28 of the act of 1961 has framed the bar council of kerala rules, 1979, hereinafter referred to as 'the rules'. under the ..... on the grounds for the refusal.5. a state bar council as per the provisions contained in section 28 of the act of 1961 has been given power to make rules to carry out the purposes of chapter iii. sub-section (2)(d) of section 28 reads as follows:(d) the conditions subject to which a person may be admitted as an .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 17 2006 (HC)

S.N.V. Sadanam Trust Vs. Corporation of Cochin

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Mar-17-2006

Reported in : 2006(3)KLT663

..... so much so the said floor is not entitled to any vacancy remission under section 239 of the act. however, if no room in any other floor is occupied by anybody for any half year or for full year, petitioner is entitled to vacancy ..... ., and residential rooms for the inmates. however, separate number given to each floor of the building may help the petitioner to avail rebate of tax under section 239 of the act. the floor which contains a kitchen, dr.'s room and common facility is certainly always on use as long as at least one inmate is there and ..... ramachandran nair, j.1. petitioner is challenging ext.p13 order issued by the respondent, by which property tax exemption claimed under section 235 and vacancy remission claimed under section 239 of the kerala municipalities act 1994 hereinafter called the 'act' are declined. i have heard counsel appearing for the petitioner and standing counsel smt, a.g. aneetha appearing for the respondent .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //