Array ( [0] => ..... and ammunition explosive which suspected to be of political nature.15. explosive act, 1984 (act no. iv of 1984) and explosive substances act, 1908 (act no. iii, vi of 1908).16. cinematography act of 1952/video piracy read with the copy of right (amendment act), 1984.17. public gambling act (svt. 1977).18. narcotic drugs and psychotropic substance act, 1985.19 ..... of offence/s in cognizable offences precedes investigation under chapter xiv of part-v of the code of criminal procedure, svt, 1989 and follows cognizance under section 190 in chapter xv-part-vi of the code.7. facts, appearing from the investigation report of any police officer, and not the jurisdiction to ..... kashmir homecdepartmentnotificationsrinagar, the 3rd june, 1999.sro-202. - in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (o) of sub-section (1) of section 4 of the code of criminal procedure, samvat 1989 (act no. xxiii of 1989) and in supersession of notification sro-133 dated 2-4-1991, the government hereby declare the officer ..... [1] => ..... to the facts of the case while passing the impugned order, it is not necessary to go to the merits of the grounds of detention, as mandated by section 10a of the act.9. a similar situation arose in jai singh and ors. v. state of jammu & kashmir : 1985crilj527 before the supreme court. the court quashed the detention ..... in armed attacks and ambushes on the members of security forces defending the mother land against the evil design of terrorist. the organization also indulge in exploding improvised explosive devices. lobbing of bomb to cause large scale destruction in persuit of its civil goals.you namely sajad ahmad bhat s/o gh. nabi bhat r/o kathsoo ..... ahmad bhat s/o gh. nabi bhat r/o kathsoo tehsil pahalgam district anantnag who has been arrested in case fir no. 56/05 under section 212 rpc, 7/25 a. act stands registered against the subject with police station bijbehara.whereas i, baseer ahmad khan district magistrate anantnag have gone through the contention of dossier produced before ..... [2] => ..... hussain, involved in case registered under f.i.r. no.14/2001 of police station basohli for offences under sections 302, 307, 396, 397, 120b, 121a, 341, 120 rpc, 3/25, 7/25 arms act and 4/5 explosive act and facing trial before the learned sessions judge, kathua, have initiated this application for their release on bail under ..... proviso to section 167 of the code of criminal procedure. 2. the petitioners further stated that even if the prosecution story ..... the pendency of the application before the higher forum, the challan is presented, even then the petitioners have the right to be released on bail under proviso (a) to section 167(2). therefore, the contention of mr. b. s. salathia, learned sr. addl.ag appearing for the state, that the application of the petitioners for compulsory ..... [3] => ..... orders of dismissal in respect of each of these employees were passed separately in exercise of powers vested with the governor under proviso (c) to sub-section (2) of section 126 of the constitution of jammu and kashmir (hereinafter referred to as 'the state constitution'). respondents in the above seven letters patent appeals and petitioners ..... minister was assassinated by two members of her security staff. in connection with the murder, criminal case under sections 307, 302 and 120b of indian penal code read with sections 25, 27, 54 and 59 of the arms act was registered and the respondent was arrested in the said criminal case. a departmental enquiry was also ordered ..... in anti-national activities inasmuch as he had participated in activities leading to even use of explosives with a view to creating disturbance. he, in fact had been detained twice under the provisions of jammu and kashmir public safety act, 1978, though the orders of detention had been quashed by the court. in short, ..... [4] => ..... to him thereby he is prejudiced in making the representation. by violating this right of detenue guaranteed under article 22(5) of the constitution and section 13 of the j&k; public safety act, the detention is rendered bad and illegal. the counsel further contends that there has been delay in executing the order of detention, notwithstanding that ..... grounds show that at least two cases on first information reports are registered against detenue in which the subject figures in connection wit recovery of some arms, ammunition and explosives. it is also part material relied on, obviously at least a little detail ought to have been placed on record to show involvement of the subject, if ..... has not been supplied any translation or transcript of the grounds in kashmiri.6. in raziya umar bakshi's case. (air 1980 sc 1751) in the context of cofeposa act of 1974. his lordship late s. murtaza fazal ali, j, observed :-'5. in this view of the matter, the detention becomes invalid on this ground alone. i ..... [5] => ..... motor vehicle the tanker had fallen on one of its sides on sloping ground resulting in escape of highly inflammable petrol and that there was grave risk of explosion and fire from the petrol coming out of the tanker. in the light of the aforesaid circumstances the learned judges of the high court have rightly concluded that ..... enlarges the field of protection made available to the victims of an accident and is in consonance with the beneficial object underlying the enactment.(37) was the accident involving explosion and fire in the petrol tanker connected with the use of tanker as a motor vehicle? in our view, in the facts and circumstances of the present case, ..... compensation.36. chagla, c.j. in the case of bhagubai v. general manager, central railway, air 1955 bom 105, in which the provision of section 3 of the workmen's compensation act was considered and observed as under:'(2) now, it is clear that there must be a causal connection between the accident and the employment in order that ..... [6] => ..... from their own explosion/implosion. 4. riot, strike and malicious damage as per riot, strike and malicious damage clause printed hereof...........' exclusions ; this insurance does not cover : 1. ..... in the said schedule or any part of such property, be destroyed or damaged by the following :-- risks covered : 1. fire : 2. lightning 3. explosion/implosion but excluding loss of or damage to other than domestic boilers, economisers or other vessels, machinery or apparatus in which steam is generated or their contents resulting ..... goods of the value of rs. 45,000/- were removed. a report waslodged with the police station. a case under sections 380 and 457 of the penal code and also under section 3 of the terrorist act was registered. it was pleaded that, no doubt, a fire policy was issued and as it covered malicious damage also, ..... [7] => ..... respondent no. 2) under his order no. f-125/dma/psa/det/99/2015-21 dated 30-11-1999 under section 8 of j & k public safety act, 1978 on the ground of preventing him from acting in any manner prejudicial to the security of the state. the detention is for a period of two years. the detention ..... in number of incidents for which various cases have been registered within jurisdiction of different police stations of district, anantnag connected with firing, planting and fabrication of explosive devices and recovery of arms and ammunition from various places together with the past antecedent activities of the detenu. in the facts and circumstances of this case ..... to bail, the detaining authority having regard to the detenu's antecedent activities thought and perceived and the ordinary law was not sufficient to deter him from acting in activities prejudicial to the security of the state. in view of this uncontroverted averment and stand of detaining authority it is obvious that the detaining authority ..... [8] => ..... to save your life from jum militants, you joined the jklf on 1991. you were sent to muzzafferabad (pok) for attaining in handling of sophisticated arms/amn. explosive in july-1991. after completion of the said training you were provided with arms/amn. and were directed to use the arms/amn. in indulging the terrorist and subversive ..... muslim youth to join their organisation and to work for it, to send them to pok/pak for attaining armed training in handling of sophisticated arms/ammunition and explosives and to indulge the arms/amn. provided to them, in subversive and disruptive activities in the valley to circulate and distribute the anti-national literature among people, ..... mohi-ud-din mir sarvar s/o ab. samad mir r/o rawalpora, tehsil beerwa, district budgam, aged 26 years, are hereby detained under section 8 as envisaged in j. & k. public safety act.3. this order of detenion came to be challenged in habeas corpus no. 71 of 1997. the learned judge who disposed of this petition held ..... [9] => ..... a very limited purpose i.e. the same can be taken into consideration as against such other person. it is now well settled that under section 30 of the evidence act the confession made by one accused is not substantive evidence against a co-accused. it has only a corroborative value, (vide kashmira singh v. ..... against the petitioner, therefore the impugned order cannot be sustained. it was further pointed out by the learned counsel that the statement recorded under section 15 of terrorists & disruptive activities (prevention) act, 1987 in fir no. 162/ 94 registered at police station sririagar cannot be used against the petitioner in the present case. admittedly present ..... k prevention & separation of sabotage act, 1965; sections 302/307 read with section 120-b, rpc has been ordered to be framed against the petitioner and respondents 2 to 4.2. case as setup in the court below against all the accused is that on 29-3-1997 respondents with a criminal intent planted explosive device (rdx) in an ..... [10] => ..... clear. those orders, which are interim in nature, cannot be the subject matter of revision under section 115. there is marked distinction in language of section 97(3) of the old amendment act and section 32(2)(i) of the amendment act. while in the former, there was clear legislative intent to save applications admitted or pending before ..... the property of the deceased and to dislodge his legal heirs. learned trial court, however, while referring to definition of the term legal heir as given in section 2(11) cpc took 3 the view that the respondents, applicants therein, are the legal representatives of the deceased-plaintiff, however, observing further that finding ..... the amendment came into force. such an intent is significantly absent in section 32(2)(i). the 5 amendment ..... [11] => ..... into commercial and vice versa in violation of permitted land use without any structural change in the building would not attract the mischief of section 7 and section 8 of the act for the reasons stated above.29. to restate, briefly, nature of user of a building is inherent in an inseparable from the ..... clearly incidental to residential uses except service uses which will create pollution, nuisance and hazard .48. the authority under the act, before taking action under section 7 of the act or issuing sealing order under section 8(1) for violation of land use without structural change, is duty bound to take a considered view after hearing/ ..... a building in violation of permitted land use even without effecting structural alteration therein and thereto attracts mischief under section 7 of the act and the authority under the act has jurisdiction to proceed under sections 7 & 8 of act and to take appropriate action including order of sealing of the building/premises so misused.31. having held ..... [12] => ..... ). the said decision was rendered by the hon?ble supreme court of india bearing in mind the employment exchanges (compulsory notification of vacancies) act, 1959, particularly, section 4(1) of the said act. in the said decision, the hon?ble supreme court (three judge bench,) in paragraph 6, held thus:- .it is common knowledge that ..... casual, adhoc, temporary/ part time/ regular must be in compliance with article 14 and 16 of the constitution of india which is equally applicable as per section 10 of the jammu & kashmir constitution. if any officer deviates the said principle and give appointment to any person/persons, the same are illegal and the person ..... of 2013 dated 26.03.2013 calling upon the authorities to strictly observe the restrictions as contained in section 14 of the jammu and kashmir civil services (special provisions) act, 2010 ( hereafter referred to as the act?).2. the action of the respondents in appointing persons through backdoor is negate the constitutional legal rights of ..... [13] => ..... a suit, but does not include any civil court of a grade inferior to such principal civil court or any court of causes section 42 of the act reads as under: section 42. jurisdiction notwithstanding anything contained elsewhere in this part or in any other law for the time being in force, where with respect ..... could most definitely arise in more than one court simultaneously. to remedy such a situation section 42 of the arbitration act mandates, that the court wherein the first application arising out of such a challenge is filed, shall alone have the jurisdiction to adjudicate upon the ..... applications arising out of that agreement and the arbitral proceedings shall be made in that court and in no other court. 19 a perusal of section 42 of arbitration act reveals a clear acknowledgement by the legislature, that the jurisdiction for raising a challenge to the same arbitration agreement, arbitral proceeding or arbitral award, ..... [14] => ..... government thought it fit to identify the posts. the belated identification of posts is now put against the appellants who are otherwise eligible to be appointed under section 22 of the act which mandates reservation of not less than 1% of the posts in each category in all establishments, namely, blindness or low vision, hearing impairment, and ..... thus:- 24. the other question which is connected with the first question and which also requires our consideration is whether the reservation provided for in section 33 of the disabilities act, 1995, was dependent on identification of posts suitable for appointment in such categories, as has been sought to be contended on behalf of the government ..... is set aside and the writ appeal is allowed. the respondents 2 and 3 are directed to consider the candidature of the appellants as per section 22 of the act and issue selection order within a period of four weeks and the 1st respondent is directed to appoint the appellants within a period of four weeks ..... [15] => ..... government thought it fit to identify the posts. the belated identification of posts is now put against the appellants who are otherwise eligible to be appointed under section 22 of the act which mandates reservation of not less than 1% of the posts in each category in all establishments, namely, blindness or low vision, hearing impairment, and ..... thus:- 24. the other question which is connected with the first question and which also requires our consideration is whether the reservation provided for in section 33 of the disabilities act, 1995, was dependent on identification of posts suitable for appointment in such categories, as has been sought to be contended on behalf of the government ..... is set aside and the writ appeal is allowed. the respondents 2 and 3 are directed to consider the candidature of the appellants as per section 22 of the act and issue selection order within a period of four weeks and the 1st respondent is directed to appoint the appellants within a period of four weeks ..... [16] => ..... 11. in (2010) 14 scc419(indian oil corporation ltd. v. subrata borah chowlek), the hon ble supreme court held that although exercise of power under section 5 of the limitation act, 1963 depends upon judicial satisfaction and no distinction is to be made between state and citizens, courts should be liberal while condoning delay in case of state ..... and due diligence have to be shown by a person seeking condonation of delay to seek the remedy before the court under section 5 of the limitation act 1961 read with section 5 of the limitation act no. ix of 1995 of jammu and kashmir and the bona fide and due diligence has to be ascertained and determined on ..... making challenge to the order which prima facie does not appear to be legally sustainable.22. the expression "sufficient cause" as appearing in section 5 of the limitation act, 1963 (in short "the limitation act") must receive a liberal construction so as to advance substantial justice as was noted by this court in g. ramegowda v. special land ..... [17] => ..... been able to establish that the insured has committed a breach of contract of insurance as envisaged under subclause (ii) of clause (a) of sub-section (2) of section 149 of the act, the insurance company shall be entitled to realise the awarded amount from the owner or driver of the vehicle, as the case may be, in ..... the policy of insurance 7 but has succeeded in defending its liability by proving breach of a specified condition of the policy of insurance in terms of section 149(2) of the act, the insure can still be directed to satisfy the award and to recover the awarded amount from the insured. in national insurance co. ltd v. ..... . the deceased died in this accident. 2 (b) legal representatives of the deceased, respondents 1 to 3 herein, preferred a claim for compensation under section 166 of the motor vehicles act ( for short the act) before the motor accident claims tribunal, jammu ( for short the tribunal) against owner and driver of the offending tractor, herein respondents 4 & 5 ..... [18] => ..... ajay gupta had succumbed to injuries in the hospital. this led to registration of case under fir no.172/98 for offence under sections 302/120-b, 121, 122 rpc, 7/25/26/27 arms act and section 3 of eao (enemy agents ordinance) by inspector jagjit singh posted as sho-surankote at that time. investigation was embarked upon. ..... sahib and asked the witness to bolt the door from inside. her husband, at that time, was in civil dress. this witness heard sound of three bullets and explosion of one bomb. after an hour, one cook, namely chander parkash came there and asked the witness for the uniform and shoes of the deceased, which were ..... pwraghbir singh has stated regarding the talk in between accused sewak singh and satpal singh. that concludes the resume of evidence brought on record by prosecution. examined under section 342 cr.pc, accused denied the allegations leveled by prosecution witnesses and pleaded innocence. accused 166 sewak singh pleaded that he had been informed that the deceased was ..... [19] => ..... aptly and rightly drawn attention of the court to government business rules. the government of jammu and kashmir in exercise of powers conferred by section 43 and sub section (2) of section 45 of the state constitution has made rules for convenient transaction of business of the government. reading of these rules in entirety would make ..... doctrine of legitimate expectation is a principle of administrative fairness, a component of natural justice. the doctrine in essence imposes a duty on public authority to act fairly taking into consideration all relevant factors before effecting a change in its policies which would affect a person who had been beneficiary of continuing policy. in ..... . likewise, seeking any opinion from the law department after cabinet decision dated 04.08.2011 was uncalled for and overdoing by the department. both these acts were contrary to and in violation of the procedure of transecting government business. once it was clearly set out in the government order dated 06.02. ..... ) Explosives Act 1884 Section 4 Definitions - Sortby Recent - Court Jammu and Kashmir - Page 2 - Judgments | SooperKanoon Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: recent Court: jammu and kashmir Page 2 of about 704 results (0.615 seconds)

Mar 22 2006 (HC)

State of J and K Vs. Suraj Parkash and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2006(2)JKJ663

..... and ammunition explosive which suspected to be of political nature.15. explosive act, 1984 (act no. iv of 1984) and explosive substances act, 1908 (act no. iii, vi of 1908).16. cinematography act of 1952/video piracy read with the copy of right (amendment act), 1984.17. public gambling act (svt. 1977).18. narcotic drugs and psychotropic substance act, 1985.19 ..... of offence/s in cognizable offences precedes investigation under chapter xiv of part-v of the code of criminal procedure, svt, 1989 and follows cognizance under section 190 in chapter xv-part-vi of the code.7. facts, appearing from the investigation report of any police officer, and not the jurisdiction to ..... kashmir homecdepartmentnotificationsrinagar, the 3rd june, 1999.sro-202. - in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (o) of sub-section (1) of section 4 of the code of criminal procedure, samvat 1989 (act no. xxiii of 1989) and in supersession of notification sro-133 dated 2-4-1991, the government hereby declare the officer .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 09 2005 (HC)

Sajad Ahmad Bhat Vs. State and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2006(2)JKJ248

..... to the facts of the case while passing the impugned order, it is not necessary to go to the merits of the grounds of detention, as mandated by section 10a of the act.9. a similar situation arose in jai singh and ors. v. state of jammu & kashmir : 1985crilj527 before the supreme court. the court quashed the detention ..... in armed attacks and ambushes on the members of security forces defending the mother land against the evil design of terrorist. the organization also indulge in exploding improvised explosive devices. lobbing of bomb to cause large scale destruction in persuit of its civil goals.you namely sajad ahmad bhat s/o gh. nabi bhat r/o kathsoo ..... ahmad bhat s/o gh. nabi bhat r/o kathsoo tehsil pahalgam district anantnag who has been arrested in case fir no. 56/05 under section 212 rpc, 7/25 a. act stands registered against the subject with police station bijbehara.whereas i, baseer ahmad khan district magistrate anantnag have gone through the contention of dossier produced before .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 09 2004 (HC)

Shafait Ali and anr. Vs. State Th. Sho, P/S

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2004(3)JKJ431

..... hussain, involved in case registered under f.i.r. no.14/2001 of police station basohli for offences under sections 302, 307, 396, 397, 120b, 121a, 341, 120 rpc, 3/25, 7/25 arms act and 4/5 explosive act and facing trial before the learned sessions judge, kathua, have initiated this application for their release on bail under ..... proviso to section 167 of the code of criminal procedure. 2. the petitioners further stated that even if the prosecution story ..... the pendency of the application before the higher forum, the challan is presented, even then the petitioners have the right to be released on bail under proviso (a) to section 167(2). therefore, the contention of mr. b. s. salathia, learned sr. addl.ag appearing for the state, that the application of the petitioners for compulsory .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 05 2003 (HC)

State of J and K and ors. Vs. Mohammad Shafi Bhat and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2004(1)JKJ48

..... orders of dismissal in respect of each of these employees were passed separately in exercise of powers vested with the governor under proviso (c) to sub-section (2) of section 126 of the constitution of jammu and kashmir (hereinafter referred to as 'the state constitution'). respondents in the above seven letters patent appeals and petitioners ..... minister was assassinated by two members of her security staff. in connection with the murder, criminal case under sections 307, 302 and 120b of indian penal code read with sections 25, 27, 54 and 59 of the arms act was registered and the respondent was arrested in the said criminal case. a departmental enquiry was also ordered ..... in anti-national activities inasmuch as he had participated in activities leading to even use of explosives with a view to creating disturbance. he, in fact had been detained twice under the provisions of jammu and kashmir public safety act, 1978, though the orders of detention had been quashed by the court. in short, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 08 2003 (HC)

Gulzar Ahmed Alai Vs. State of J and K and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2003(3)JKJ628

..... to him thereby he is prejudiced in making the representation. by violating this right of detenue guaranteed under article 22(5) of the constitution and section 13 of the j&k; public safety act, the detention is rendered bad and illegal. the counsel further contends that there has been delay in executing the order of detention, notwithstanding that ..... grounds show that at least two cases on first information reports are registered against detenue in which the subject figures in connection wit recovery of some arms, ammunition and explosives. it is also part material relied on, obviously at least a little detail ought to have been placed on record to show involvement of the subject, if ..... has not been supplied any translation or transcript of the grounds in kashmiri.6. in raziya umar bakshi's case. (air 1980 sc 1751) in the context of cofeposa act of 1974. his lordship late s. murtaza fazal ali, j, observed :-'5. in this view of the matter, the detention becomes invalid on this ground alone. i .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 31 2002 (HC)

National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Shiv Dutt Sharma

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2004ACJ2049

..... motor vehicle the tanker had fallen on one of its sides on sloping ground resulting in escape of highly inflammable petrol and that there was grave risk of explosion and fire from the petrol coming out of the tanker. in the light of the aforesaid circumstances the learned judges of the high court have rightly concluded that ..... enlarges the field of protection made available to the victims of an accident and is in consonance with the beneficial object underlying the enactment.(37) was the accident involving explosion and fire in the petrol tanker connected with the use of tanker as a motor vehicle? in our view, in the facts and circumstances of the present case, ..... compensation.36. chagla, c.j. in the case of bhagubai v. general manager, central railway, air 1955 bom 105, in which the provision of section 3 of the workmen's compensation act was considered and observed as under:'(2) now, it is clear that there must be a causal connection between the accident and the employment in order that .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 02 2002 (HC)

National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Ashok Kumar Bararoo

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : AIR2003J& K9

..... from their own explosion/implosion. 4. riot, strike and malicious damage as per riot, strike and malicious damage clause printed hereof...........' exclusions ; this insurance does not cover : 1. ..... in the said schedule or any part of such property, be destroyed or damaged by the following :-- risks covered : 1. fire : 2. lightning 3. explosion/implosion but excluding loss of or damage to other than domestic boilers, economisers or other vessels, machinery or apparatus in which steam is generated or their contents resulting ..... goods of the value of rs. 45,000/- were removed. a report waslodged with the police station. a case under sections 380 and 457 of the penal code and also under section 3 of the terrorist act was registered. it was pleaded that, no doubt, a fire policy was issued and as it covered malicious damage also, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 27 2001 (HC)

Gh. Qadir Raina Vs. State and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2001CriLJ4105

..... respondent no. 2) under his order no. f-125/dma/psa/det/99/2015-21 dated 30-11-1999 under section 8 of j & k public safety act, 1978 on the ground of preventing him from acting in any manner prejudicial to the security of the state. the detention is for a period of two years. the detention ..... in number of incidents for which various cases have been registered within jurisdiction of different police stations of district, anantnag connected with firing, planting and fabrication of explosive devices and recovery of arms and ammunition from various places together with the past antecedent activities of the detenu. in the facts and circumstances of this case ..... to bail, the detaining authority having regard to the detenu's antecedent activities thought and perceived and the ordinary law was not sufficient to deter him from acting in activities prejudicial to the security of the state. in view of this uncontroverted averment and stand of detaining authority it is obvious that the detaining authority .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 02 1999 (HC)

State of J. and K. Vs. Gh. Mohi-ud-dIn and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2000CriLJ1270

..... to save your life from jum militants, you joined the jklf on 1991. you were sent to muzzafferabad (pok) for attaining in handling of sophisticated arms/amn. explosive in july-1991. after completion of the said training you were provided with arms/amn. and were directed to use the arms/amn. in indulging the terrorist and subversive ..... muslim youth to join their organisation and to work for it, to send them to pok/pak for attaining armed training in handling of sophisticated arms/ammunition and explosives and to indulge the arms/amn. provided to them, in subversive and disruptive activities in the valley to circulate and distribute the anti-national literature among people, ..... mohi-ud-din mir sarvar s/o ab. samad mir r/o rawalpora, tehsil beerwa, district budgam, aged 26 years, are hereby detained under section 8 as envisaged in j. & k. public safety act.3. this order of detenion came to be challenged in habeas corpus no. 71 of 1997. the learned judge who disposed of this petition held .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 28 1998 (HC)

Shahid Sheikh Vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2000CriLJ298

..... a very limited purpose i.e. the same can be taken into consideration as against such other person. it is now well settled that under section 30 of the evidence act the confession made by one accused is not substantive evidence against a co-accused. it has only a corroborative value, (vide kashmira singh v. ..... against the petitioner, therefore the impugned order cannot be sustained. it was further pointed out by the learned counsel that the statement recorded under section 15 of terrorists & disruptive activities (prevention) act, 1987 in fir no. 162/ 94 registered at police station sririagar cannot be used against the petitioner in the present case. admittedly present ..... k prevention & separation of sabotage act, 1965; sections 302/307 read with section 120-b, rpc has been ordered to be framed against the petitioner and respondents 2 to 4.2. case as setup in the court below against all the accused is that on 29-3-1997 respondents with a criminal intent planted explosive device (rdx) in an .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //