Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: recent Court: jammu and kashmir Page 1 of about 704 results (0.050 seconds)

Aug 13 2015 (HC)

Shaber Ayaz and Others Vs. State and Others

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

..... act, 2003.4.essential commodities act, 1955 (eca).5.explosive substances act, 1908.6.explosives act, 1884.7.foreigners act, 1946.8.immoral traffic (prevention) act, 1956.9.motor vehicles act, 1988.10.narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985.11.passport act, 1967.12.passport entry into india act, 1920.13.prevention of food adulteration act, 1954.14.prevention of money laundering act, 2002.15.army act.16.drug control act, 1950.17.extradition act ..... counsel next referred to question no.2, which reads as under: the provision of hostile witness is provided under - of evidence act:- a) sec 155 b) sec 133 c) sec 154 d) sec 154. according to him from amongst the options, option (c) and (d) were the correct answering. the board who ..... can order a person who is likely to commit breach of peace to execute a bond under - crpc. a) sec 107 b) sec 109 c) sec 109 d) sec 151. the board which has been constituted for evaluation of answer scripts has clearly indicated in the decision that answer to .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 27 2011 (HC)

Shiv Lal Vs. National Hydroelectric Power

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

..... whatsoever against the corporation for non-issue of the construction materials for preliminary, enabling and ancillary works as mentioned in clause 23.6(a), which includes the explosives and the decision of the engineer-in-charge in respect of clause 23.6(a) & (b) is final, conclusive and binding on the contractor. ..... , invoking clause 55 of the contract agreement. responding to the petitioners notice seeking arbitration, the corporation stated that there was irregularity in supplying the explosives for some early period of the contract but the petitioner was suitably compensated when he was paid idling charges by the corporation. the delayed progress ..... by him, by arbitration, was, however, denied. the petitioner has, therefore, approached this court seeking appointment of an arbitrator invoking section 11 of the jammu and kashmir arbitration and conciliation act, 1997. 5. the corporations response to the petition, inter alia, indicates that the dispute raised by the petitioner was not .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 30 2010 (HC)

State of Jammu and Kashmir Vs. Balkar Singh and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

..... of the conspiracy so hatched, to have brought the ammunition from across the border for subversive activities. after usual investigation charge sheet alleging commission of offence punishable under section 3 pss act, 120-b, 121, 122, 153-b rpc was presented in the court of sessions judgment jammu. the accused no. 3 and 4 (respondents) were found ..... case before learned trial court was that the accused 1 and 2 were found roaming near the border and that on being questioned were found to have concealed the explosives near the border. the prosecution expected to draw support from the testimony of sh. a.k. pandey cited as pw1 in the charge sheet to whom according ..... border observation post 15 and chowani. the search operation is said to have lead to recovery of improvised explosive devices weighing 1.5.kilogram and 1. kilogram and four time pencils. the explosives allegedly were brought by the accused 1 and 2 (respondents 1 and 2) from across border and concealed to be used on this side of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 28 2008 (HC)

Javed Iqbal Vs. State and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2008(2)JKJ44

..... and other associates, who went underground in nagaland, through his friends and relatives. shah syed hussain and his gang since received some arms and explosives from naga rebels for committing acts of sabotage and creating large-scale disturbances, particularly in the plains areas along assam-nagaland border.that, in the circumstances, shri kshetra gogai's ..... not released from custody and was rather taken in custody by police station joint interrogation centre jammu in fir no. 1 of 2007 under sections 18 of unlawful activities (prevention) act 120b, and section 121 rpc. while he was in custody with the police, the district magistrate issued yet another order for his preventive detention. the grounds ..... arisen after the date of expiry. the order dated 28th august, 1969 was therefore, not at all justified under section 13(2) of the act and that order being in violation of the provisions of the act has to be held to be invalid, so that the detention under that order is illegal.11. in view of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 05 2007 (HC)

State Vs. Said Mohd.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2008(1)JKJ476

..... , j.1. learned sessions judge, poonch has made this reference for quashing the proceedings and its order taking cognizance in case state v. said mohd. under section 4/5 explosives substances act, 1908, without its having been committed to it.2. learned sessions judge says that taking of cognizance by the court, without its having been committed to it ..... would cease to be so for the simple reason that the case was not committed to it....21. the expression 'a court of competent jurisdiction' envisaged in section 465 is to denote a validly constituted court conferred with jurisdiction to try the offence of offences. such a court will not get denuded of its competence to ..... have regard to the fact whether the objection could and should have been raised at an earlier stage in the proceedings.5. in view of the provisions of section 537, any error, omission or irregularity in the trial of a case would not vitiate the proceedings unless such error, omission or irregularity had occasioned failure of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 04 2007 (HC)

Sr. Superintendent of Police Vigilance Organization Vs. Gh. Rasool Mag ...

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2007(3)JKJ450

..... enacted for forfeiture and confiscation of explosive and arms/ammunitions respectively after conviction of the accused. under these two statutes therefore, the provision of forfeiture/confiscation come into ..... officer investigating an offence under the act when he has reason to believe the property in relation to which such enquiry or investigation is being conducted is illegally acquired and is likely to be concealed transferred or dealt with in any manner that would frustrate the forfeiture proceedings.(d) under section 10 of 'explosive act 1884' and section 32 of 'arms act 1959' enabling provisions have been .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 22 2006 (HC)

Rukhsar Ahmad Wani Vs. State of J and K and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2008(1)JKJ382

..... petitioner says that the detention order suffers from non-application of mind of the detaining authority besides being unwarranted and unconstitutional as it offends section 13 of public safety act and article 22(5) of constitution of india. learned counsel submits that there was no material worth the name justifying detention of the ..... and to spread scare and alarm among the general public with the plan to cause killings, destruction of property by causing explosions and by using lethal/fire arm weapons. whereas, you were acting as a courier and harbour of militants at your residence at udhampur for the last three years and has also ..... the source or material, unless, however, the detaining authority exercises his power to dispense with the requirement of disclosing grounds of detention under section 13(2) of the public safety act, in public interest, renders the detention unconstitutional for it deprives the detenue his light of making an effective representation against his detention.8. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 06 2006 (HC)

Jetinder Singh Sirohi Vs. State and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2007(1)JKJ586

..... registered at p/s cik humhama, which the senior superintendent of police describes in his dossier as a case registered under sections 3/4 tada, 2/3 e&imco;, 251.a. act, 4/5 explosive substances act besides sections 302, 307, 365 and 120b of rpc. the punishment which these offences entail is death penalty or life imprisonment. satisfaction ..... may be safely concluded that requisite material was not there on records on the basis whereof detention of the petitioner could be ordered under section 8 of jammu and kashmir public safety act 1978. grounds of detention being vague and ambiguous have deprived the petitioner/ detenue of his constitutional right under article 22(5) to make ..... of the matter he had been deprived of his constitutional right under article 22(5) of constitution of india and legal right under section 13 of jammu and kashmir public safety act 1978.6. learned state counsel, on the other hand, produced the detention records and submitted that there was enough material on records .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 20 2006 (HC)

Sher Singh Vs. State of J. and K.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2007CriLJ513

..... sent to him by the police. such is the position of law as to the proving of the contents of a document. chapter iv of the evidence act smvt. 1977, in section 60, provides that oral evidence must in all cases whatever, be direct, that is to say if it refers to an opinion or to the grounds on ..... admissible in evidence. section 510 of the chapter xli of the code of criminal procedure dealing with special rules of evidence, reads thus:510. report of chemical examiner(1) any document purporting to be a report under the hand of any chemical examiner or assistant chemical examiner to government (or the chief inspector of explosive or the director ..... most casual and cursory manner.incriminating circumstances appearing in evidence in a prosecution are required to be put separately to the accused for his explanation, is the mandate of section 342 of the code of criminal procedure. learned sessions judge has committed an error in not following this mandate. appellant's counsel, in my opinion, is, thus, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 05 2006 (HC)

Maqbool HussaIn and ors. Vs. State of J and K and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2007(1)JKJ226

..... and ammunition were recovered from the possession of accused and trial court rightly convicted and sentenced the accused for the commission of offence punishable under section 7/25 arms act.71. in view of the above discussion, this review petition merits to be partly allowed and partly rejected. viewed thus, the order of ..... is relevant, insofar as they are necessary for the purpose, are relevant. so the evidence of identification is a relevant piece of evidence under section 9 of the evidence act where the evidence consists of identification of the accused person at his trial. the statement of the witness made in the court, a fortiori ..... shafi, ghulam hussan wani, nissar hussain and lal hussain were apprehended and arms, ammunition and explosives were recovered from their possession details of which are given in the seizure memos.4. accused had brought the arms, ammunitions, explosives from paskistan after crossing border and obtaining training from isi, in order to escalate the militant .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //