Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: old Year: 2003 Page 86 of about 4,604 results (0.394 seconds)

Mr. Bharat Shantilal Shah, Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2003BomCR(Cri)947; (2002)1BOMLR527

..... subject to aminimum fine of rupees two lacs.'so read the mischief as submitted by the petitionerswill not occur.34. then provisions of section 4 of mcoc act arechallenged. the section reads thus:'4. punishment for possessing unaccountablewealth on behalf of member of organizedsyndicate.--if any person on behalf of amember of an ..... have nothing incommon with those under mcoca, for the purpose ofdenying consideration of bail. we therefore strikedown the words 'or under any other act' as beingunconstitutional. the section would therefore read asunder:'notwithstanding anything contained in thecode, the accused shall not be granted bailif it is noticed by the court that ..... that casewent on to lay down the principles of interpretation incase of such encroachment of jurisdictional spheres.'it is also not disputed that under section 2of the 1975 act the entire tobacco industrywas taken over by the central government.having thus narrated the admitted facts, iwould now proceed to the merits of .....

Mohammad GayasuddIn Son of Wali Mohammad Vs. the State of Maharashtra, ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2003BomCR(Cri)1727; 2003CriLJ2994

..... : 1) he intended to threaten the unity, integrity, security or sovereignty of india, 2) he intended to strike terror in the people, 3) any section of people does any act or thing by using bombs, dynamites or other explosive substances or inflammable substances or firearms or other lethal weapons or poisons or noxious gases or other chemicals or by any other substances (whether ..... ) whoever - (a) with intent to threaten the unity, integrity, security or sovereignty of india or to strike terror in the people or any section of the people does any act or thing by using bombs, dynamite or other explosive substances or inflammable substances or firearms or other lethal weapons or poisons or noxious gases or other chemicals or by any other substances (whether .....

Vijayadevi Navalkishore Bhartia and anr. Vs. Land Acquisition Officer ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2003(3)ALLMR(SC)297; 2003(2)AWC1425(SC); (2003)3CALLT1(SC); RLW2003(3)SC407; 2003(3)SCALE21; (2003)5SCC83; 2003(2)LC982(SC)

..... issued by him. he alternatively contended that assuming that the commissioner had no appellate power, such power is definitely available to the appropriate government under section 15a of the act which power can also be exercised by the commissioner.8. the issue in this appeal centers around the question of the authority of the commissioner ..... petition. the high court also held that if the appellants were aggrieved by the reduction in the market value, they would approach the reference court under section 18 of the act.6. mr. v.a. mehta, learned senior counsel appearing for the appellants, reiterated the contention of the appellants urged before the high court and ..... appellants claimed a compensation @ rs. 1.75 per sq. ft. based on the claim of the appellants, the collector who held an inquiry under section 11 of the act, called for information report from the assistant director of town planning for determination of the compensation payable. the said asstt. director of town planning in turn .....

State of U.P. Vs. Rasid and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2003SC1243; 2003CriLJ2011; JT2003(5)SC50; RLW2003(4)SC493; 2003(2)SCALE719; (2003)9SCC449

..... to the conclusion that a conviction could be safely based on the evidence of prosecution witnesses especially that of pw-2 with the aid of section 149 ipc.7. in appeal the high court primarily proceeded to examine the prosecution case in regard to time of occurrence and in this ..... given such benefit of doubt. the prosecution witnesses who were present at the time of incident have very clearly and consistently spoken about the overt acts of a-4, a-5 and a-8 along with a-1, a-2 and a-3 which is supported by medical evidence also ..... pw-2 has stated that rasid a-3 fired twice which hit chheddan and ishtiyaq. this evidence of pw-2 in regard to overt act of rasid finds corroboration from the evidence of pw-3 who has stated that a-3 rasid who was carrying a single barrel gun had ..... who entered the house and that he exhorted others to kill a-1. he also supports pws.2 and 3 in regard to overt act of a-1. thus from the evidence of these witnesses, it is clear that a-1 had entered the house carrying a fire- .....

Kanakeswar Narzary Vs. Deputy Commissioner and ors.

Court : Guwahati

..... by the petitioner in support of the election petition as required by rule 94a also does not satisfy the requirement of the proviso to sub-section (1) of section 83 of the act and form 25 appended to the rules. the several averments relating to commission of corrupt practice by the first respondent as contained in paras 4 ..... when in an election petition, the election petitioner prays for setting aside the election of returned candidate on the ground of his corrupt practice as enumerated under section 123 of the rp act, the election petitioner, in addition to the statement of material facts, must also set forth full particulars of any such corrupt practice as alleged. mr ..... the hearing of the aforesaid misc case, the election petitioner filed an application under order vi rule 17 of the code of civil procedure read with section 87 of the rp act praying for amendment of his election petition. this misc application gave rise to present misc case no. 24/2002. by his said amendment application, the .....

P. Kullaiah Swamy Vs. Sub-inspector of Police and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2003(1)ALD(Cri)676; 2003(4)ALT60; 2003(2)ALT(Cri)192; 2003CriLJ2488

..... . they conducted a panchanama and seized and sealed theatre on the allegation that the petitioner was screening obscene films and allegedly committed offence under section 294 of indian penal code, ipc and section 7 of the cinematograph act, 1952 (central act). challenging the action of respondents in seizing and sealing the theatre the writ petition is filed.2. while admitting the writ petition this ..... obscene films. the lessee of the theatre, kagithala shaik rizwan, operator, chulake lakshmi narayana, who were accused in crime no. 74 of 2000 registered under section 294 of ipc read with section 7(1)(a) of cinematograph act were arrested. subsequently, both of them were released on bail by the court of judicial magistrate of first class. jammalamadugu.4. insofar as arrest of .....

Nagulappally Jabbar and anr. Vs. Raheemunnisa

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2003(4)ALT479

..... , the learned counsel representing the appellants -defendants in the suit, had submitted that the question of limitation is a substantial question of law and under section 3 of the limitation act 1963 it is the duty of the court to decide the question of limitation and even on the admission of the plaintiff that the suit was filed ..... pleas as alternative relief. it was pleaded that the 1st defendant was always ready to complete the transactions and he is entitled to protection under section 53-a of transfer of property act as he had purchased the property from the ostensible owner and he had perfected his title by adverse possession.8. on the strength of the ..... evidence, the plaintiff who was able to established the title, cannot be non-suited on the question of limitation. that is the settled position under the present limitation act, 1963. in the light of this legal position, and especially in view of the concurrent findings recorded by both the courts relating to 'the title to the property .....

Arun Kumar JaIn Vs. Om Parkash

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2003)134PLR344

..... rs. 30,000/- per shop and wants to get the profit because of his relation with legal minds'.8. the respondent/tenant ought to have recourse to section 14 of the act. instead of that, he made an attempt to clarify his stand only before the appellate authority, which felt inclined to subscribe to the view that there was ..... rent controller dated may 11, 1987 for eviction of the tenant om parkash, respondent-herein passed in a petition under section 13 of the haryana urban (control of rent & eviction) act, 1973 ( in short to be referred as 'the act').2. the diary of the facts in brief is that the petitioner purchased the shop in dispute from sudesh kumar and ..... the landlord summarily on the ground that the issues raised by the petitioner here are substantially the issues, as have been finally decided in the former proceedings under this act. taking an unclear stand in the written statement as stated above, would not amount to discharging the burden. in my view, on the existing un-clear plea by .....

Shri Guman Singh Workman Vs. the Presiding Officer, Labour Court and a ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2003)134PLR592

..... written agreement between the management and the workman and the same should have been signed by theparties in such manner as may be prescribed. section 13(1) of the act further providesthat a settlement arrived at by agreement between the employer and workman otherwisethan in conciliation proceedings shall be binding on the parties to the ..... and the management otherwise than in the course of conciliation proceedings shall be binding on the parties. the word 'settlement' has been defined in section 2(p) of the act in the following terms:,'settlement' means a settlement arrived at in the course of conciliation proceeding and includes a written agreement between the employer and ..... given the award to the effect that the reference in question was fully settled. the word 'award' has been defined in clause (b) of section 2 of the act as under:-'an interim or final determination of any industrial dispute or of any question relating thereto by any labour court, industrial tribunal or national .....

Tallapragada Narasimhamurthy Vs. Director, School Education and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2003(3)ALD482

..... service and the plaint allegations made the said objective clear and it was also held that the said suit was not a suit governed by section 34 of the specific relief act and hence the suit for bare declaration without a consequential relief was certainly maintainable in law, and the stand taken by the director that because ..... fertilizers, : air1991sc1546 , it was held that a civil suit by an employee before superannuation relating to the correction of date of birth is not barred by section 2(a) of the industrial disputes act, 1947. it was held in md. mil khan v. g.k. w. ltd., : air1988cal257 , that a suit for declaration for rectification of date ..... opinion, cannot be granted for the reason that it will amount to directing the university to violate the procedure that is to act in violation of law which is not permissible. section 39 of the specific relief act, 1963 dealing with mandatory injunctions reads as hereunder:'when, to prevent the breach of an obligation, it is necessary to .....