Array ( [0] => ..... his letter dated 3-5-2000 informed the petitioner that there is no provision of law other than section 11b of the central excise act under which money could be refunded. it is in these circumstances, petitioner is before me.3. notice was issued and the respondent has filed statement of ..... order dated 16-9-1997 directed the petitioner to pay a sum of rs. 7 crores as pre-deposit for taking up the appeal in terms of section 35f of the central excise act. petitioner paid the entire sum of rs. 7 crores in terms of the interim order. appellate authority in terms of his order dated 31-7- ..... crores. respondent issued an endorsement at annexure-e stating therein that the petitioner has to file regular refund claim under section 11b of the central excise act along with all relevant documents. petitioner thereafter by a letter contended that section 11b has no application to cases of pre-deposit since that was not a payment of excise duty. respondent by ..... [1] => ..... elaborate arguments to convince this court on the aspect of jurisdiction of the respective courts in entertaining the o.p.s. for grant of succession certificates.3. section 371 of the indian succession act, 1925 dealing with court having jurisdiction to grant certificate reads as hereunder:-'the district judge within whose jurisdiction the deceased ordinarily resided at the time of his death ..... died on 5-3-2001 when he came to hyderabad on some work to this place.7. heard the counsel.8. it is pertinent to note that the powers under section 24 of the code of civil procedure are very wide. as can be seen from the respective allegations made in the affidavits filed in support of the transfer cmps and ..... [2] => ..... . 6, wherein it was held that landlord cannot convert residential building into a non-residential building without the permission of the rent controller as required under section 11 of the act. it is also held that where a residential building is let out by a landlord for non residential purpose, even then landlord is entitled to eject ..... the findings of both the courts below are that it is a residential building and in order to convert it to a non-residential house, permission under section 11 of the act was required to be obtained from the rent controller. the observation of the rent controller in this regard as under:-'it is clear that the residential ..... controller has raised an unwarranted presumption that the demised premises was a residential building and its conversion from residential to non-residential was in violation of section 11 of the act. the basis of his submission is the purpose for which the building was let out vide rent note dated 14.10.11965 which specified book binding ..... [3] => ..... that the apex court in national insurance co. ltd. v. behari lal, 2000 acj 1428 (sc), after noticing the proviso to section 147(2) of the act, has held that the proviso to sub-section (2) of section 147 of the 1988 act, does not limit the policy of the insurance, to payment of compensation to the extent specified in the policy of insurance in ..... carry with it the right to appeal against the award, in any event, to the extent of enabling it to claim that its liability was limited by section 95 (2) of the motor vehicles act, 1939. we are therefore of the view that the insurance company is entitled to raise the contention that its liability was limited. we may notice incidentally ..... of the supreme court has also recently held in new india assurance co. ltd. v. c.m. jaya, 2002 acj 271 (sc), that in terms of section 95 (2) of the motor vehicles act, 1939, the liability of the insurer was limited, but it was open to the insured to make payment of additional premium and get a higher risk covered ..... [4] => ..... the supreme court in national insurance company limited v. beharilal and ors. (2000) 7 scc 137 after noticing the proviso to section 147(2) of the act. has held that the proviso to sub-section (2) of section 147 of the 1988 act, does not limit the policy of the insurance, to payment, of compensation to the extent specified in the policy of insurance ..... with it the right to appeal against the award, in any event, to the extent of enabling it to claim that its liability was limited by section 95 (2) of the motor vehicles act, 1939. we are therefore of the view that the insurance company is entitled to raise the contention that its liability was limited. we may notice incidentally ..... supreme court has also recently held in new india assurance co. ltd. v. cm. jaya and ors., 2002 (i) scale 183 that in terms of section 95 (2) of the motor vehicles act, 1939, the liability of the insurer was limited, but it was open to the insured to make payment of additional higher premium and get a higher risk ..... [5] => ..... appeal no,14 of 1985 and rent appeal no.16-r of 1985.2. bhupinder kaur, the respondent land-lady filed an application under section 13 of the east punjab urban rent restriction act, 1949 seeking eviction of the petitioner in the court of rent controller, ferozepur. initially, the petitioner was inducted as a tenant in the, ..... the respondent-landlady to defeat the claim of the petitioners. the rent controller held that tajinder singh and tripatpal singh are guilty of serious misconduct. criminal proceedings under section 340 cr.p.c. were ordered to be initiated against both of them. further a reference has been made to the registrar-cum-deputy commissioner, ferozepur for ..... the page in a different ink. on the basis of the blatant interpolations, the rent controller has directed that proceedings be initiated against tripat pal singh under section 340 cr.p.c. these findings of fact were not even assailed before the appellate authority. i am of the considered opinion that the findings recorded by ..... [6] => ..... by his letter dated 3-5-2000 informed the petitioner that there is no provision of law other than section 11-b of the central excise act under which money could be refunded. it is in these circumstances, petitioner is before me. 3. notice was issued and the respondent has filed statement of ..... order dated 16-9-1997 directed the petitioner to pay a sum of rs. 7 crores as pre-deposit for taking up the appeal in terms of section 35-f of the central excise act. petitioner paid the entire sum of rs. 7 crores in terms of the interim order. appellate authority in terms of his order dated 31-7- ..... crores. respondent issued an endorsement at annexure-e stating therein that the petitioner has to file regular refund claim under section 11-b of the central excise act along with all relevant documents. petitioner thereafter by a letter contended that section 11-b has no application to cases of pre-deposit since that was not a payment of excise duty. respondent ..... [7] => ..... was being discharged by them. the pollution control board, in compliance with the above-mentioned order, dated 20.9.95, issued directions under the provisions of section 33a of the act. the board also identified 20 more units, which were responsible for causing pollution. respondent no. 3 issued directions to the rajasthan state electricity board (for ..... this area is being referred by respondent no. 3, as the polluted area. the affidavit further goes on to state that the board issued notices under section 25 of the act, to the aforesaid 86 units, directing them to forthwith apply for the consent of the pollution control board. out of these units, 42 units, ..... (ii) that non-petitioner no. 5 further be directed to check the raising of unauthorised construction of factories without compliance of the statutory provisions of section 25 of the act of 1975 and impose penalties on the factories found violating the statutory provision; (iii) any other writ, order or direction which this hon'ble court ..... [8] => ..... any division court, pursuant to section 108 of the government of india act made (on or after the 1st day of february, 1929) in the exercise of appellate jurisdiction in respect of a decree or order made in the ..... order made in the exercise of revisional jurisdiction, and not being a sentence or order passed or made in the exercise of the power of superintendence under the provisions of section 107 of the government of india act, or in the exercise of criminal jurisdiction) of one judge of the said high court or one judge of any division court, pursuant to ..... section 108 of the government of india act and that notwithstanding anything hereinbefore provided an appeal shall lie to the said high court from a judgment of one judge of the said high court or one judge of ..... [9] => ..... implied the right to represent against the findings on the charges. this was considered to be an essential part of the reasonable opportunity incorporated earlier in section 240 (3) of the goi act and later in article 311(2) of the constitution as originally enacted. the right to receive the inquiry officer's report and to show cause ..... the inquiry report had been submitted to the petitioner, the petitioner would have shown before the disciplinary authority that the findings of the inquiry officer could not be acted upon. taking these aspects into consideration, we are of the view that it cannot be ruled out that non-supply of inquiry report to the petitioner caused ..... the report, the apex court held thus:'7. what emerges from the above survey of the law on the subject is as follows:since the government of india act, 1935 till the 42nd amendment of the constitution, the government servant had always the right to receive report of the inquiry officer/authority and to represent against ..... ) Explosives Act 1884 Section 4 Definitions - Sortby Old - Year 2003 - Page 91 - Judgments | SooperKanoon Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: old Year: 2003 Page 91 of about 4,604 results (0.124 seconds)

Mar 07 2003 (HC)

Nestle India Limited Vs. Asstt. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-07-2003

Reported in : 2003(154)ELT567(Kar); ILR2004KAR1641

..... his letter dated 3-5-2000 informed the petitioner that there is no provision of law other than section 11b of the central excise act under which money could be refunded. it is in these circumstances, petitioner is before me.3. notice was issued and the respondent has filed statement of ..... order dated 16-9-1997 directed the petitioner to pay a sum of rs. 7 crores as pre-deposit for taking up the appeal in terms of section 35f of the central excise act. petitioner paid the entire sum of rs. 7 crores in terms of the interim order. appellate authority in terms of his order dated 31-7- ..... crores. respondent issued an endorsement at annexure-e stating therein that the petitioner has to file regular refund claim under section 11b of the central excise act along with all relevant documents. petitioner thereafter by a letter contended that section 11b has no application to cases of pre-deposit since that was not a payment of excise duty. respondent by .....

Tag this Judgment!
Mar 07 2003 (HC)

Ahmedunnisa Begum Vs. Badarunnisa Begum and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-07-2003

Reported in : 2003(4)ALD871

..... elaborate arguments to convince this court on the aspect of jurisdiction of the respective courts in entertaining the o.p.s. for grant of succession certificates.3. section 371 of the indian succession act, 1925 dealing with court having jurisdiction to grant certificate reads as hereunder:-'the district judge within whose jurisdiction the deceased ordinarily resided at the time of his death ..... died on 5-3-2001 when he came to hyderabad on some work to this place.7. heard the counsel.8. it is pertinent to note that the powers under section 24 of the code of civil procedure are very wide. as can be seen from the respective allegations made in the affidavits filed in support of the transfer cmps and .....

Tag this Judgment!
Mar 07 2003 (HC)

Sh. Raj Kumar Gambir Vs. Sh. Kanwar SaIn Jain

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-07-2003

Reported in : (2003)134PLR356

..... . 6, wherein it was held that landlord cannot convert residential building into a non-residential building without the permission of the rent controller as required under section 11 of the act. it is also held that where a residential building is let out by a landlord for non residential purpose, even then landlord is entitled to eject ..... the findings of both the courts below are that it is a residential building and in order to convert it to a non-residential house, permission under section 11 of the act was required to be obtained from the rent controller. the observation of the rent controller in this regard as under:-'it is clear that the residential ..... controller has raised an unwarranted presumption that the demised premises was a residential building and its conversion from residential to non-residential was in violation of section 11 of the act. the basis of his submission is the purpose for which the building was let out vide rent note dated 14.10.11965 which specified book binding .....

Tag this Judgment!
Mar 07 2003 (HC)

Divisional Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Gokula Moharan ...

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Mar-07-2003

Reported in : 2004ACJ1893

..... that the apex court in national insurance co. ltd. v. behari lal, 2000 acj 1428 (sc), after noticing the proviso to section 147(2) of the act, has held that the proviso to sub-section (2) of section 147 of the 1988 act, does not limit the policy of the insurance, to payment of compensation to the extent specified in the policy of insurance in ..... carry with it the right to appeal against the award, in any event, to the extent of enabling it to claim that its liability was limited by section 95 (2) of the motor vehicles act, 1939. we are therefore of the view that the insurance company is entitled to raise the contention that its liability was limited. we may notice incidentally ..... of the supreme court has also recently held in new india assurance co. ltd. v. c.m. jaya, 2002 acj 271 (sc), that in terms of section 95 (2) of the motor vehicles act, 1939, the liability of the insurer was limited, but it was open to the insured to make payment of additional premium and get a higher risk covered .....

Tag this Judgment!
Mar 07 2003 (HC)

The Divisional Manager, Representing United India Insurance Co. Ltd. V ...

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Mar-07-2003

Reported in : 2003(I)OLR413

..... the supreme court in national insurance company limited v. beharilal and ors. (2000) 7 scc 137 after noticing the proviso to section 147(2) of the act. has held that the proviso to sub-section (2) of section 147 of the 1988 act, does not limit the policy of the insurance, to payment, of compensation to the extent specified in the policy of insurance ..... with it the right to appeal against the award, in any event, to the extent of enabling it to claim that its liability was limited by section 95 (2) of the motor vehicles act, 1939. we are therefore of the view that the insurance company is entitled to raise the contention that its liability was limited. we may notice incidentally ..... supreme court has also recently held in new india assurance co. ltd. v. cm. jaya and ors., 2002 (i) scale 183 that in terms of section 95 (2) of the motor vehicles act, 1939, the liability of the insurer was limited, but it was open to the insured to make payment of additional higher premium and get a higher risk .....

Tag this Judgment!
Mar 07 2003 (HC)

Madan Lal and anr. Vs. Smt. Bhupinder Kaur and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-07-2003

Reported in : (2003)134PLR154

..... appeal no,14 of 1985 and rent appeal no.16-r of 1985.2. bhupinder kaur, the respondent land-lady filed an application under section 13 of the east punjab urban rent restriction act, 1949 seeking eviction of the petitioner in the court of rent controller, ferozepur. initially, the petitioner was inducted as a tenant in the, ..... the respondent-landlady to defeat the claim of the petitioners. the rent controller held that tajinder singh and tripatpal singh are guilty of serious misconduct. criminal proceedings under section 340 cr.p.c. were ordered to be initiated against both of them. further a reference has been made to the registrar-cum-deputy commissioner, ferozepur for ..... the page in a different ink. on the basis of the blatant interpolations, the rent controller has directed that proceedings be initiated against tripat pal singh under section 340 cr.p.c. these findings of fact were not even assailed before the appellate authority. i am of the considered opinion that the findings recorded by .....

Tag this Judgment!
Mar 07 2003 (HC)

Nestle India Limited Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise, Mys ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-07-2003

Reported in : 2003(89)ECC432; 2003(3)KarLJ419

..... by his letter dated 3-5-2000 informed the petitioner that there is no provision of law other than section 11-b of the central excise act under which money could be refunded. it is in these circumstances, petitioner is before me. 3. notice was issued and the respondent has filed statement of ..... order dated 16-9-1997 directed the petitioner to pay a sum of rs. 7 crores as pre-deposit for taking up the appeal in terms of section 35-f of the central excise act. petitioner paid the entire sum of rs. 7 crores in terms of the interim order. appellate authority in terms of his order dated 31-7- ..... crores. respondent issued an endorsement at annexure-e stating therein that the petitioner has to file regular refund claim under section 11-b of the central excise act along with all relevant documents. petitioner thereafter by a letter contended that section 11-b has no application to cases of pre-deposit since that was not a payment of excise duty. respondent .....

Tag this Judgment!
Mar 07 2003 (HC)

Vijay Singh Punia Vs. Raj. State Board for the Prevention and Control ...

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Mar-07-2003

Reported in : AIR2003Raj286; RLW2003(2)Raj1012; 2003(2)WLC465

..... was being discharged by them. the pollution control board, in compliance with the above-mentioned order, dated 20.9.95, issued directions under the provisions of section 33a of the act. the board also identified 20 more units, which were responsible for causing pollution. respondent no. 3 issued directions to the rajasthan state electricity board (for ..... this area is being referred by respondent no. 3, as the polluted area. the affidavit further goes on to state that the board issued notices under section 25 of the act, to the aforesaid 86 units, directing them to forthwith apply for the consent of the pollution control board. out of these units, 42 units, ..... (ii) that non-petitioner no. 5 further be directed to check the raising of unauthorised construction of factories without compliance of the statutory provisions of section 25 of the act of 1975 and impose penalties on the factories found violating the statutory provision; (iii) any other writ, order or direction which this hon'ble court .....

Tag this Judgment!
Mar 07 2003 (HC)

State of A.P. Vs. Laksminarayana @ Langoda Laxman

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-07-2003

Reported in : 2003(3)ALD57; 2003(3)ALT439

..... any division court, pursuant to section 108 of the government of india act made (on or after the 1st day of february, 1929) in the exercise of appellate jurisdiction in respect of a decree or order made in the ..... order made in the exercise of revisional jurisdiction, and not being a sentence or order passed or made in the exercise of the power of superintendence under the provisions of section 107 of the government of india act, or in the exercise of criminal jurisdiction) of one judge of the said high court or one judge of any division court, pursuant to ..... section 108 of the government of india act and that notwithstanding anything hereinbefore provided an appeal shall lie to the said high court from a judgment of one judge of the said high court or one judge of .....

Tag this Judgment!
Mar 07 2003 (HC)

Shri V.S. Gajul, Being Ex-junior Clerk, Working in the Court of the Le ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-07-2003

Reported in : 2003(3)ALLMR847; 2003(4)BomCR516

..... implied the right to represent against the findings on the charges. this was considered to be an essential part of the reasonable opportunity incorporated earlier in section 240 (3) of the goi act and later in article 311(2) of the constitution as originally enacted. the right to receive the inquiry officer's report and to show cause ..... the inquiry report had been submitted to the petitioner, the petitioner would have shown before the disciplinary authority that the findings of the inquiry officer could not be acted upon. taking these aspects into consideration, we are of the view that it cannot be ruled out that non-supply of inquiry report to the petitioner caused ..... the report, the apex court held thus:'7. what emerges from the above survey of the law on the subject is as follows:since the government of india act, 1935 till the 42nd amendment of the constitution, the government servant had always the right to receive report of the inquiry officer/authority and to represent against .....

Tag this Judgment!




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //