Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: old Year: 2003 Page 85 of about 4,604 results (0.126 seconds)

Flotech Welding and Cutting Systems Limited, a Company Registered Unde ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (2004)188CTR(Bom)268; 2004(3)MhLj87

..... in that case, the return of income filed by the assessee for the relevant assessment year was not accompanied by the statutory audit report mandated by section 44ab of the act. the assessee had not rectified the defect within the stipulated time and had not sought extension of time either before the assessing officer or before the ..... explanation that it was not possible to reopen the accounts once they were adopted at the annual general meeting of the shareholders in terms of section 210 of the companies act. he submitted that even assuming there was a difference in the profit shown in the audited balance sheet and the profit and loss account and ..... petitioner fairly stated that after treating the revised return for assessment year 1991-1992 as invalid, the assessing officer has passed assessment order under section 143(3) of the income tax act ('i.t. act' for short) and the appeal filed against the said assessment order is pending. he submitted that the petitioner is willing to peruse the .....

State of Haryana Vs. Balwant Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2003SC1253; 2003(2)JKJ11[SC]; (2003)IILLJ527SC; 2003(2)SCALE599; (2003)3SCC362; [2003]2SCR557; 2003(2)LC943(SC)

..... dismissing or removing from service. only further action is taken under regulation 16(a) in relation to forfeiture of pension. thus, punishing a person under section 71 of the army act and making order under regulation 16(a) are entirely different. hence, there is no question of applying principle of double jeopardy to the present case.'7. ..... same offence. punishment is imposed under section 71 of the army act after (sic) by court martial. passing an order under regulation 16(a) in the matter of grant or forfeiture of pension comes thereafter and it ..... held thus:-'a contention, though feebly, was advanced on behalf of some of the respondents that forfeiture of pension in addition to the punishment imposed under section 71 of the army act amounted to double jeopardy. in our view, this contention has no force. there is no question of prosecuting and punishing a person twice for the .....

Kamalammal Vs. Minor Senthil,

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR2003Mad337; (2003)1MLJ756

..... filed on 8.2.85. pending the suit, the appellant has purchased item no. 1 of the suit property and therefore, the transaction is hit by section 52 of the transfer of property act. 7. i have given my anxious consideration to the respective submissions. insofar as the second submission of the learned counsel for respondents 1 and 2 as to ..... the challenge to the purchase of item no. 1 of the suit property by the appellant is hit by section 52 of the transfer of property act, it is to be seen that it was not the case of the first and second respondents either before the trial court or before the lower ..... this case that the third respondent/father visited with a decree for damages for malicious prosecution. to judge a debt as one of 'vyavaharika debt' or 'avyavaharika debt', the act of the person which lead to the suit and the decree is relevant. suit was filed against the third respondent for malicious prosecution. plea of malicious prosecution was found in .....

Vijay Kumar Gupta Vs. Registrar of Companies

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : [2004]50SCL171(HP)

..... illegal.10. the other accusation against the petitioners and respondents 2 and 3 is regarding filing of a false information punishable under section 628 of the companies act. section 628 of the said act reads as follows :'section 628. penalty for false statements.--if in any return, report, certificate, balance sheet, prospectus, statement or other document required ..... the records.5. the first accusation against the petitioners is that along with respondents 2 and 3, they violated the provisions of section 146 of the companies act, section 146 of the said act reads as under ;'146. registered office of company.--(1) a company shall, as from the day on which it begins to carry ..... of the company, shall be the officers in default. therefore, all the directors of the company will be officers in default within the meaning of section 5 of the act only when there is no managing director, whole time director, manager, secretary, a person, charged by the board with the responsibility of complying with .....

V. Rajagopal Vs. Municipal Corporation of Rajahmundry and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2003(3)ALD64; 2003(4)ALT62

ORDERG. Rohini, J. 1. This writ petition is filed seeking a writ of mandamus declaring the action pf the 1st respondent-Municipal Corporation of Rajahmundry in confining the works of laying pavement only to the tile manufacturing companies and also in awarding most of the works to the respondents 2 and 3 in violation of the procedure in respect of tender notification No.45/2002-03 dated 27.12.2002 as arbitrary and illegal and seeking consequential directions.2. The case of the petitioner is that being a Class-Ill contractor, he is eligible to be entrusted with the works worth Rs.50.00 lakhs and he is competent to execute the civil works of any nature like constructing buildings, laying roads, pavements with interlocking tiles and etc., The 1st respondent issued tender notice No.45/2002-03 dated 27.12.2002 inviting tenders for execution of 104 civil works like laying roads, pavements, construction of culverts, drainages and etc., It was mentioned that the last date for applying for tend...

Bondar Singh and ors. Vs. Nihal Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2003SC1905; 2003(2)CTC635; (2003)2MLJ122(SC); RLW2003(2)SC283; 2003(2)SCALE589; (2003)4SCC161; [2003]2SCR564

..... filed in 1972.10. the defendants have tried to take advantage of the fact that a receiver had been appointed with respect to the suit land in proceedings under section 145 of the code of criminal procedure. according to the defendants the possession of the receiver was on their behalf. this is not correct. the plaintiffs had ..... e. 16th april, 1956. the notice was followed by an application dated 8th may, 1956 (exhibit p.3) filed by the defendants under section 58 of the madhya bharat land revenue and tenancy act, 1950 before the revenue authorities. in the said application the defendants admit that the land in question was in possession of the plaintiffs since the ..... several judgments in support of his contention. we do not consider it necessary to discuss these decisions because so far as the question of powers of high courts under section 100 c.p.c. is concerned, it needs no discussion. if the findings of the subordinate courts on facts are contrary to evidence on record and are perverse .....

National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Urmila Devi and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2004ACJ1507; [2003(97)FLR530]; (2003)IIILLJ178All

..... to the person entitled to compensation to choose whether he would seek the remedy available under the motor vehicles act or the workmen's compensation act. the provisions contained in section 168 of the motor vehicles act stipulate that motor accident claims tribunal has to determine the amount of compensation which appears to it to be just ..... the risk.3. it may be noticed that the application filed by the dependants of the deceased shyamvir singh @ pappu had been filed under section 163a of the motor vehicles act.4. the motor accident claims tribunal vide the impugned judgment and award after carefully considering the evidence brought on record by the parties, had ..... for the insurer-appellant and shri b.p. verma, learned counsel for the claimants-respondents.2. the appellant has filed the present appeal under section 173 of the motor vehicles act feeling aggrieved by the award of an amount of rs. 4,08,000 determined as just compensation which the dependants of the deceased shyamvir singh .....

Boeing Co. Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

..... the export promotion expenses of such disc attributable to such receipts, or "(3) taxable income based upon the sale price actually charged (but subject to the rules provided in section 482). "(b) rules for commissions, rentals, and marginal costing "the secretary shall prescribe regulations setting forth "(2) rules for the allocation of expenditures in computing combined ..... on the application of the cost allocation rules of 26 cfr 1.861-8(e)(3) (1979) solely for the geographic sourcing of income. see economic recovery tax act of 1981, pub. l. 97-34, 223, 95 stat. 249. as a result, research expenditures made for research conducted in the united states were allocated against ..... distributed. see 26 u. s. c. 991-997. typically, "a disc is a wholly owned subsidiary of a u. s. corporation." 1 senate finance committee, deficit reduction act of 1984, 98th cong., p. 630, n. 1 (comm. print 1984) (hereinafter committee print). the statute thus provides an incentive to maximize the disc's share-and to .....

Moseley Vs. Vs. Secret Catalogue, Inc.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... and that seeks to prevent dilution of the distinctiveness of a mark, label, or form of advertisement. '''(4) the following shall not be actionable under this section: "'(a) fair use of a famous mark by another person in comparative commercial advertising or promotion to identify the competing goods or services of the owner ..... the capacity of a famous mark to identify and distinguish goods or services." 1 the question we granted ithe ftda provides: "sec. 3. remedies for dilution of famous marks. "(a) remedies.-section 43 of the trademark act of 1946 (15 u. s. c. 1125) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: "'(c)( ..... of news reporting and news commentary.' "(b) conforming amendment.-the heading for title viii of the trademark act of 1946 is amended by striking 'and false descriptions' and inserting " false descriptions, and dilution.' "sec. 4. definition. "section 45 of the trademark act of 1946 (15 u. s. c. 1127) is amended by inserting after the paragraph defining when .....

State of West Bengal and anr. Vs. E.i.T.A. India Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2003SC4126; JT2003(3)SC365; 2003(3)SCALE361; (2003)5SCC239; [2003]2SCR668; [2003]131STC111(SC)

..... neither an arbitrary condition nor an unreasonable restriction. in our view, this judgment does not help the respondents for reasons more than one. firstly, section 8-a of that act, as it stood at that time was upheld by the constitution bench as valid and secondly, in the instant case, the impugned provisions embody ..... ancillary power to enact provisions to prevent evasion of tax. the learned counsel has argued that the tribunal is clearly wrong in declaring explanation below section 11(1) of the act as arbitrary, unreasonable so unconstitutional.4. in examining the constitutional validity of the impugned provision of a statute, it will be useful to bear ..... was then in force. 2. the respondents challenged the constitutional validity of the following provisions of the act: (i) section 2(6); (ii) explanation to sub-section (1), sub-section (5), (7), (8), (10), (11) and (12) of section 11; (iii) sub-section (4) of section 14; and (iv) rules 172, 173, 174, 188 and 189 of the west bengal sales .....