Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: old Year: 1989 Page 11 of about 1,699 results (0.126 seconds)

Jan 27 1989 (HC)

Jhabarmal Panda Vs. Bhagawati Prasad Kedia

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Jan-27-1989

..... not consider the fact that the plaintiff was unable to prove his case to obtain a decree as contemplated under any of the clauses enumerated under section 5 of the assam urban areas rent control act, 1972. the learned counsel also submitted that in absence of any finding the court loses its jurisdiction to pass a decree for eviction of the defendant ..... no! maintainable or does not lie under the provisions as contemplated under o.43 of the c.p.c. in 1976, the appeal lies against the ex parte decree under section 96 of the c. p.c. as an appeal against the decree.9. coming to the main submission of mr. barua it is noticed from the impugned judgment that the ..... the aforesaid rule it appears that the above rule contemplates two kinds of cases where a person is already adjudged to be of unsound mind as defined under the lunacy act. that would be the first category of persons of unsound mind whose cases are covered by the provisions of rule 15 of order 32. there may be another category of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 28 1989 (HC)

United India Insurance Co. Vs. C.S. Gopalakrishnan and anr.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-28-1989

Reported in : I(1989)ACC524; (1989)IILLJ30Ker

..... the circumstances proved in the case would attract the provisions of law enjoining the liability to pay compensation by the employer to the employee. the relevant section under the act is section 3 which reads thus:3. employer's liability for compensation-- (1) if personal injury is caused to workman by accident arising out of and in ..... has to be towards the person for whose benefit the legislation is made. bearing this principle in mind, the expression 'accident' found in sub-section (1) of section 3 of the act has to be understood as meaning a mishap or untoward event, not expected or designed. in other words, the basic and indispensable ingredient of an ..... definitely contribute to great strain both mentally and physically and that definitely contributed to a probable cause for his cardiac arrest. the appellate power under section 30 of the act makes it clear that no appeal shall lie against an order of the commissioner unless there is a substantial question of law involved in the appeal .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 30 1989 (HC)

Oriental Fire and Genl. Ins. Co. Ltd. Vs. Ponugoti Ramanamma and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-30-1989

Reported in : I(1990)ACC643; 1990ACJ928

..... well as by the learned judges of the karnataka and rajasthan high courts.22. the limits on the quantum of compensation are contained in sub-section (2) of section 95 of the act. this sub-section imposes minimum limit of the liability. it is open to the insurer to insure for such higher amounts as the parties may agree on payment ..... and includes a motor cab, contract carriage and stage carriage. the proviso to sub-section (1) of section 95 excepts from the act policy: (1) coverage of the liability in respect of the death or bodily injury sustained by an employee, arising out of and in the course of ..... in a public place. in this case insurant's liability against death of or bodily injury to passengers of a public service vehicle is covered. in sub-section (25) of section 2 of the act, the expression 'public service vehicle' is defined as any other vehicle used or adapted to be used for the carriage of passengers for hire or reward, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 30 1989 (HC)

Kannekanti Varamma and ors. Vs. Puli Ramakotaiah and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-30-1989

Reported in : 1990ACJ539

..... each of the widows towards consortium has not been challenged. accordingly it is confirmed.2. the contention of mr. mangachary is that section 95 (2) of the motor vehicles act (act 4 of 1939), for short 'the act', provides limits of the policy and the liability of the insurance company. under clause (a) thereof, where the vehicle is a ..... , there arises no liability. this contention did not find favour with the tribunal below and was negatived. it is undoubted that clause (a) of sub-section (2) of section 95 provides the entitlement to carry persons not exceeding six in number excluding the driver and the cleaner. the vehicle admittedly carried more than six persons for ..... bodily injury to the victims. the question, therefore, is what is the compensation to which the appellants are entitled? the defence taken in the tribunal below is that section 95 (2) (a) provides only for carriage of passengers upto six in number and if any passenger, carried in excess thereof, the insurance company is not .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 30 1989 (HC)

Mallayya Vs. Totayya

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-30-1989

Reported in : ILR1989KAR807; 1989(1)KarLJ225

..... with the view of ramendra mohan datta, acj., that even in a case where the defence against delivery of possession of a tenant is struck off under section 17(4) of the act, the defendant, subject to the exercise of an appropriate discretion by the court on the facts of a particular case, would generally be entitled.(a) to ..... have the right of cross-examination excepting on the point of notice under section 36 of the west bengal premises tenancy act, 1956 when defence had beer struck out under subsection (3) of section 17 of the said act. we may briefly state the said sub-section (3) of section 17 did no more than deny the right of defence to the tenant, ..... who was in arrears of rent. after exhaustively discussing the provisions of the said west bengal premises tenancy act and earlier cases of the supreme court .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 30 1989 (HC)

income-tax Officer Vs. Dr. S. Surender Reddy.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-30-1989

Reported in : [1989]30ITD296(Mad)

..... laid down by the supreme court in r. b. jodha mal kuthialas case (supra) while interpreting the meaning of the expression 'owner' occurring in section 22 of the income-tax act, 1961, which is in pari materia with sec. 22 of the income-tax act, 1922, for the purpose of determining the question whether the assessee is entitled to claim depreciation under ..... section 32(1) of the income-tax act. thus, their lordships held that the assessee is entitled to depreciation on the building purchased and used by it for the purpose of its business even though ..... 15) stabilizer used for regulated power supply to medical equipments.(16) electric fans (exhaust fans) used for removing fumes arising from the test material during the tests.(17) aloka sec. scanner used to scan and see various body parts like liver, heart, spleen on a t. v. monitor.(18) densitameter used to see and measure the density of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 30 1989 (HC)

In Re: M. Gnanendra

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-30-1989

Reported in : (1994)IIILLJ124AP

ORDERJagannadha Rao, J.1. The petitioner is an employee on daily wages, and in connection with certain conduct, the Corporation decided to take disciplinary action. They issued a charge memo on 24.12.1988. Simultaneously they passed the impugned order dated 24.12.1988 which reads as follows:-'Pending disciplinary action Sri M. Gnanendra, E.503782, casual Conductor of Giddalur depot who was involved in Cash and ticket irregularities case on 19.12.1988 and has been placed under 'Depot Spare', is hereby kept under Put-Off duty with immediate effect'.The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no provision in any of the rules made by the Corporation permitting them to keep the petitioner on Put-Off duty.2. The learned counsel also referred to certain A.P. Industrial Standing Orders and Rules but failed to bring to my notice any particular rules which prohibits the passing of an order like the one impugned in this case.3. The submission of the learned counsel that there is ...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 1989 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Smt. Radha Devi Poddar

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jan-31-1989

Reported in : (1989)82CTR(Cal)42,[1990]185ITR544(Cal)

..... another judgment of this court in the case of monohar gidwany v. cit : [1983]139itr498(cal) ,12. chapter xiv of the act deals with 'procedure for assessment'. section 139(1) of the act requires every person having assessable income to furnish a return of income within a specified period of time. if a return has not been ..... the commissioner (appeals) cancelled the penalty orders by observing as under :'the definition of 'regular assessment' as per section 2(40) of the act meant the assessment made under section 143 or section 144. now, referring to the provisions of section 273 as were applicable to the year under appeal, it was clear therefrom that, if the income-tax officer ..... the case of deviprasad kejriwal v. cit : [1976]102itr180(bom) . in that case, the question was, whether levying of penalty under section 18a(9)(a) read with section 28 of the indian income-tax act, 1922, for the assessment year 1948-49 was valid or not. there, tulzapurkar j. held that (at page 183) :'the real question .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 1989 (HC)

Parameswaran Vs. M.K. Parameswaran Nair

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-31-1989

Reported in : II(1989)ACC65; 1991ACJ124; (1993)IIILLJ707Ker

..... in the cutting machine on occasions when regular cutter shri vasudevan was not available. he therefore found that the applicant was not a workman as defined in section 2(n) of the act, that the accident did not arise out of the employment and therefore dismissed the application. the applicant appeals that decision.5. the point of law which ..... unless these -two circumstances are present cumulatively, a person who is otherwise a workman may not cease to be a workman because of the exclusion contained in section 2(n) of the act. another division bench of this court in kochappan v. krishnan, 1987 (1) klt 86, also held that'it is only when both the ingredients are together ..... intention of the statute and not to stultify the same by rigid and mechanical approaches. if the claimant before him was a workman as defined in section 2(n) of the act, he should have seen to it that the workman receives the compensation. it is unfortunate that he embroiled himself in a highly technical debate which would .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 1989 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Kerala State Industrial Development Cor ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-31-1989

Reported in : [1990]182ITR62(Ker)

..... the above count, is a revenue expenditure laid out wholly and exclusively for the purpose of the business of the assessee and so admissible as deduction under section 37(1) of the income-tax act in computing the income under 'profits and gains of business.'4. the above conclusion of the appellate tribunal is assailed by the revenue. in the questions formulated .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //