Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: old Year: 1989 Page 7 of about 1,699 results (0.168 seconds)

Jan 18 1989 (HC)

P. Nagesh Vs. Karnataka State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-18-1989

Reported in : II(1989)ACC213; AIR1990Kant136; 1989(1)KarLJ333

..... the 1988 model. having regard to the fact that the 3rd respondent is a new entrant and the route is a short route he is entitled to a preference under section 104a(ii)(a) of the rules, the r.t.a. ought to have endeavoured to give effect to the rule preference contained in r. 104a (ii)(a). when ..... the rule itself provides for giving preference, it becomes the duty of the transport authorities empowered to grant stage carriage permits to implement the object of the act and the rules and not to allow such object to be defeated on some ground which does not have a bearing on the operation of the service. the question as ..... for the applications. the petitioner, 3rd respondent and six others filed the applications. the r.t.a. considered all the eight applications after following the procedure prescribed under the act and held that the petitioner was entitled to five marks whereas the respondent was entitled to four marks and also that the 3rd respondent was not having the vehicle ready .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 18 1989 (HC)

Dept. of Non-banking Companies, Reserve Bank of India and State of Mah ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-18-1989

Reported in : [1991]70CompCas231(Bom)

..... nos. 1 and 2 by the trial magistrate is set aside and accused nos. 1 and 2 are convicted of the offence punishable under section 58b(5)(a)(i) read with section 58c of the reserve bank of india act, 1934. accused no. 1, i.e., the company, is sentenced to pay a fine of rs. 15,000. accused no. 2 is sentenced ..... india. therefore, the amounts collected by the accused by way of subscription were clearly deposits within the meaning of the term used in those directions and section 45-i(bb) of the reserve bank of india act, 1934. i have also referred to the evidence of shri damle, pw-2, wherein he has stated that he has not seized the books of ..... and 1977 issued by the reserve bank of india and, therefore, the collections made by them from the subcribers were 'deposits' within the term defined in section 45-i(bb) of the reserve bank of india act, 1934, and sub-clause (d) of para 3 of the directions issued on august 23, 1973, and sub-clause (c) of para 3 of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 18 1989 (SC)

P.L. Shah Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-18-1989

Reported in : AIR1989SC985; 1989(1)BLJR23; 1967CriLJ1390; [1989(58)FLR334]; (1989)1GLR513; JT1989(1)SC98; 1989LabIC1253; (1989)ILLJ302SC; 1989(1)SCALE81; (1989)1SCC546; [1989]1SCR224; 19

..... special leave is whether in a case of this nature, the tribunal was right in holding that the application before it was barred by time. sub-section (1) of section 21 of the act, no doubt, says that a tribunal shall not admit an application in a case where a final order such as is mentioned in clause (a) ..... the date on which the order dated 6-5-1982 had been passed apparently on the grounds of limitation set out in sub-section (2) of section 21 of the administrative tribunals act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act'). aggrieved by the order of the tribunal; the appellant filed this appeal.4. the question for consideration in this appeal by ..... anything contained in sub-section (1) of section 21 where the grievance in respect of which an application is made had arisen by reason by any order made at any time during the period of three years immediately preceding the date on which the jurisdiction, powers and authority of the tribunal become exercisable under the act in respect of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 18 1989 (HC)

M.S. Mahadeviah Vs. Bangalore City Corporation

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-18-1989

Reported in : ILR1989KAR1239; (1989)IILLJ192Kant

ORDER1. In view of the fact that these petitions can be disposed of on a short point the same are taken up for final hearing. 2. In these petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution the petitioners have sought for issuing a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners for promotion to the post of I Grade Revenue Inspectors in accordance with law and if found eligible to promote them from the date of placing them in additional charge and give all consequential benefits from 6th March 1980 and 19th March 1980 respectively. 3. It is not in dispute that in accordance with the Cadre and Recruitment Rules of Bangalore City Corporation of the year 1971, a post of I Grade Revenue Inspector has to be filled up by promotion from the cadre of II Grade Revenue Inspectors. The petitioners in W.Ps. 12393 to 12397 and 12400 were placed in additional charge of the post of I Grade Revenue Inspectors on 6th March 1980 as per Annexure-A. The petitioners in W.Ps. ...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 18 1989 (FN)

Mistretta Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jan-18-1989

..... certificate; operation of a common carrier under the influence of drugs that causes injury and alteration of one motor vehicle identification number; illegal trafficking in explosives and trespass; interference with a flight attendant and unlawful conduct relating to contraband cigarettes; aggravated assault and smuggling $11,000 worth of fish." dissenting ..... the field of criminal sentencing provide a factual background and statutory context that give content to the mandate of the commission. see american power & light co. v. sec, 329 u. s. 90 , 329 u. s. 104 -105 (1946). [ footnote 11 ] petitioner argues that the excessive breadth of congress' delegation to ..... situated offenders and in uncertainty as to an offender's actual date of release by executive branch parole officials, congress passed the sentencing reform act of 1984 (act), which, inter alia, created the united states sentencing commission as an independent body in the judicial branch with power to promulgate binding sentencing .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 18 1989 (TRI)

Har Parshad and Co. Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Decided on : Jan-18-1989

Reported in : (1989)29ITD608(Delhi)

..... of the assessee-company and that she may not fall within the definition of the word relative, for the purpose of disallowance of expenditure under the provisions of section 40a of the it act, yet the fact remains that she was intimately connected with the management of m/s. harprashad & co.ltd. and she was one of its directors at ..... proceed to record them in the presence of the parties before us.2. the income-tax officer made the impugned assessment on 19-9-1984 under section 143(3) read with section 144b of the act. in this assessment he determined the total income of the assessee at rs. 34,95,840 as against the loss return of rs. 7,53, ..... ito for the year under appeal appearing at pages 29 to 32 and further special resolution passed on 12-10-1978 and the explanatory statement required under section 173(2) of the companies act, 1956 were brought to our notice.in particular agreement dated 19th july, 1978 was projected as the document evidencing service rendered by the commission agents for .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 1989 (SC)

Janta Machine Tools Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-19-1989

Reported in : AIR1989SC979; JT1989(1)SC165; 1989(1)SCALE191; 1989Supp(1)SCC281; [1989]1SCR273; [1989]73STC55(SC); 1989(1)LC465(SC)

..... this unit is eligible to get exemption from sales tax/inter state sales tax...with effect from date of production commencement for 5-6-7 years under section 4-a of the sales tax act vide g.o. no. 8244-bha/l8-l 1-231(a) bha/39, dated4. the difficulty in the appellant's way appears to have been created ..... tax in respect of the goods manufactured by it in terms of a notification issued by the state government on 30.9.1982 under section 4a of the uttar pradesh sales tax act, 1948 (hereinafter called the 'act'). this application was rejected by a division level committee by an order dated 9.2.1987 and a further review application was also dismissed ..... denial of the exemption, which it claims it is entitled to, the appellant has preferred this appeal.section 4a of the act reads as under:4-a. exemption from sales tax of certain goods for specified period-(1) notwithstanding anything contained in section 3 or section 3-a, where the state government is of the opinion that it is necessary so to do .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 1989 (HC)

Makum Tea Company (India) Ltd. and anr. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Jan-19-1989

..... which includes within its concept other categories of income also, namely, salaries, interest on securities, income from house property, capital gain and income from other sources. section 28 of the act further fortifies this submission inasmuch as only certain types of income have been held as chargeable to income under the head 'profits and gains of business or profession ..... jaipuria''s case : [1971]82itr580(sc) . that case was under the provisions of the indian income-tax act, 1922, whose section 10(4) was parallel to section 40(a)(ii) of the 1961 act. a reference to section 10(4) of the old act shows that this had debarred deduction, inter alia, of any cess levied on the profits and gains of ..... of surtax in question for two reasons : (1) the surtax is not a 'tax' of which mention has been made in section 40(a)(ii) of the act ; and (2) the bar created by section 40(a)(ii) contemplates a tax levied on the profits and gains of any business or profession, whereas the surtax is leviable on .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 1989 (HC)

Commissioner of Gift-tax Vs. G. Lakshmana Sarma

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-19-1989

Reported in : [1989]178ITR211(Ker)

..... for consideration. it was, therefore, held that no question of assessing the gift under section 4(1)(a) or 4(1)(b) of the gift-tax act arises. the appeal filed by the assessee was allowed. the revenue filed an application under section 26(1) of the gift-tax act to refer certain questions of law (four of them), which, in its view, ..... the apparent owner to the real owner, there is no question of transfer for consideration whether inadequate or not and the question of applying section 4(1)(a) or section 4(1)(b) or for that matter even section 4(1) will not apply ? (3) whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, was the tribunal right in ..... apparent owner to the real owner, there was no question of transfer for consideration, whether inadequate or not, and the question of applying section 4(1)(a) or 4(1)(b) or for that matter even section 4(1) does not arise. the revenue pressed before the appellate tribunal the admission of the assessee contained in his wealth-tax return for .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 1989 (HC)

Chandmama Publications Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-19-1989

Reported in : (1989)76CTR(Mad)97; [1989]176ITR321(Mad)

..... occasion to consider the question whether a provision made for gratuity would qualify as an item of expenditure prior to and after the introduction of section 40a(7) of the act. at page 598, the supreme court pointed out that the payment of gratuity made on retirement or termination of service was not for the ..... surviving partner and while settling the accounts of the firm, an amount was taken into account as retrenchment compensation payable to the employees under section 25ff of the industrial disputes act, which would arise on a transfer of ownership. the question arose whether the sum constituted an allowable expenditure in computing the income of the ..... principles as to computation of profits. further, it was also pointed out that the liability of the assessee in respect of retrenchment compensation under section 25f of the industrial disputes act was not a liability in praesenti, but was only a contingent liability, which cannot be taken into account as an accrued liability, even though .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //