Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: old Court: supreme court of india Page 90 of about 20,679 results (0.306 seconds)

Mar 17 1952 (SC)

Veerappa Pillai Vs. Raman and Raman Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1952SC192; (1952)IMLJ806(SC); [1952]1SCR583

..... fruits of the decree obtained by them at the hands of the high court after much expenditure of time and money. 14. an examination of the relevant sections of the motor vehicles act does not support the view that the issue of a permit for a bus - which falls within the definition of a 'stage carriage' - is necessarily ..... be cancelled; and the procedure prescribed for cancellation was not followed. 17. when the government was moved by messrs. raman and raman ltd., under section 64(a) of the motor vehicles act, they had before them a petition for withdrawal of the permanent permits issued to veerappa pillai and for transfer or grant of five 'pucca permits' ..... . s. c. 7632, which had been substituted for the disputed buses as they had become unroadworthy and useless. the application for renewal has under section 58, sub-clause (2), of the act to be treated as a fresh application for new permits. this procedure was followed and on 22nd october, 1949, a notification was issued inviting objections .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 21 1952 (SC)

Lachman Singh and ors. Vs. the State

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1952SC167; 1952CriLJ863; (1952)IIMLJ100(SC); [1952]1SCR839

..... approach. but as to what should be the rule when there is clear and unimpeachable evidence as to independent and authentic statements of the nature referred to in section 27 of the evidence act, having been made by several accused persons, either simultaneously or otherwise, all that we wish to say is that as at present advised we are inclined to think ..... cannot avail the appellants in this court. the comment against the discoveries made at the instance of swaran singh was that they are not admissible in evidence under section 27 of the indian evidence act, which provides - 'when any fact is deposed to as discovered in consequence of information received from a person accused of an offence in the custody of a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 27 1952 (SC)

Dattatreya Moreshwar Pangarkar Vs. the State of Bombay and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1952SC181; (1952)54BOMLR525; 1952CriLJ955; (1952)IIMLJ119(SC); [1952]1SCR612

..... was void. that contention was negatived. the point that arises for determination in the present case, however, is whether the government when making an order under section 11 of the act has got to specify a period for the continuance of the detention. the question as to the meaning of the words 'such period as it thinks fit' ..... the appropriate authority at that time before it decides to extend the detention any further; but it seems to me to be clear from the provision of section 13 that the act contemplates review of individual cases by the appropriate government from time to time irrespective of any period being mentioned in the order of detention. it can ..... of course, the appropriate government is always at liberty to terminate the order of detention earlier, if it considers proper, in exercise of its general powers under section 13 of the act. i am not much impressed by the argument that the non- mentioning of the period in the order of confirmation is likely to cause serious prejudice to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 31 1952 (SC)

State of Madras Vs. V.G. Row

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1952SC196; 1952CriLJ966; (1952)IIMLJ135(SC); [1952]1SCR597

..... constitutes as dangers to the public peace, the provincial government may be notification in the official gazette declare such association to be unlawful.' 7. the amending act substituted for clause (b) in section 15 (2) the following clause :- ' (b) which has been declared by the state government by notification in the official gazette to be unlawful ..... distinguishable in several essential particulars. for one thing experiment of individuals, like preventive detention is largely precautionary and based on suspicion. in fact, section 4 (1) of the easts punjab public safety act, which was the subject of consideration in dr. khare's case (1950) s.c.r. 519authorised both preventive detention and experiment for ..... it was under this provision that the validity of the notification issued on the 10th march, 1950, under old section 16 fell to be considered in the light of the provisions of the amended act when the petition came up for hearing in the high court on 21st august, 1950.11. it will be seen .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 14 1952 (SC)

Mahabir Gope and ors. Vs. Harbans NaraIn Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1952SC205; [1952]1SCR775

..... that a person inducted into possession of land as a raiyat even by a trespasser became a non-occupancy raiyat within the meaning of section 5, sub-section 2 of the bengal tenancy act and was protected from ejectment. but this decision has been subsequently explained away in several cases as based on the proposition that the ..... in the present appeal. 4. as the trial, the plaintiffs alleged and maintained that the lands were their zirat lands within the meaning of section 116 of the bihar tenancy act and that the defendant first party could acquire no rights of occupancy in the same. the subordinate judge found against this contention and held that ..... tenant and a kabuliyat in favour of the landlord. this was in 1908. the mortgage was redeemed in june 1942 by payment in proceedings under section 83 of the transfer of property act, when the plaintiffs went to take possession, they were resisted by the gope (defendant first party), and after unsuccessful criminal proceedings, the plaintiffs .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 24 1952 (SC)

Musammat Phool Kuer Vs. Musammat Pem Kuer and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1952SC207; (1952)IMLJ823(SC); [1953]1SCR793

..... in support of this proposition. the learned counsel for the appellant was unable to displace this proposition. it is quite clear that the plea of section 41 of the transfer of property act could only be raised against mohan kuer or her legal representatives but is not available against the plaintiff, mohan kuer having acquired a limited life estate ..... the transferee while adopting the defence taken by madho lal and by the heirs of jwala prasad, pleaded that he was protected by the provisions of section 41 of the transfer of property act. 31. the high court held that in case where a person who has allowed another to occupy the position of an ostensible owner has limited ..... estate, the rule of section 41 applies only during the lifetime of the limited owner and is not available to protect transferees against the claim of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 25 1952 (SC)

Joshi Girjadharji and anr. Vs. Lachmanji Panth and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1952SC218; [1952]1SCR645

..... this appeal has strongly questioned the correctness of the full bench decision relied on by the high court and the interpretation put by the high court on section 21 and section 2 (9) of the act. as we think this appeal can be decided on a simpler ground we do not consider it necessary, on this occasion, to express any opinion ..... deduction of income-tax from his salary was made in february 1932. no rebutting evidence was adduced by the decree-holders on the hearing of the application under section 8 of the act of 1940. the income-tax assessment form filed during the trial of the mortgage suit and marked as exhibits is dated february 9, 1933, and shows that ..... on either of these questions which are by no means free from doubt. 9. the present application has been made under section 8 of the u. p. debt redemption act, 1940, sub-section (1) of which, omitting the proviso, runs as follows :- 'notwithstanding the provisions of any decree or of any law for the time being .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 28 1952 (FN)

Beauharnais Vs. Illinois

Court : US Supreme Court

..... its context of federal powers and functions. [ footnote 5/1 ] this court has never sustained a federal criminal libel act. one section of the sedition act of 1798 was close to being a "group libel" act. [ footnote 5/2 ] while there were convictions page 343 u. s. 289 under it, no attack on ..... , maine, mississippi, missouri, montana, nebraska, nevada, new jersey, new mexico, north dakota, ohio, oklahoma, pennsylvania, tennessee, texas, utah, wisconsin, and wyoming. for citations to article and section, see n. 6, supra. [ footnote 5/13 ] arizona, georgia, idaho, kentucky, louisiana, maryland, michigan, minnesota, north carolina, oregon, virginia, and washington. the georgia provision, const ..... this pamphlet, if it resulted in a riot or caused injury to any individual negro, such as being refused living quarters in a particular section, house or apartment, or being refused employment, certainly there would be no constitutional obstacle to imposing civil or criminal liability for actual results. .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 02 1952 (SC)

Visweshwar Rao Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1952SC252; [1952]1SCR1020

..... fundamental right of equal protection of the law guaranteed by article 14 of the constitution. in the circumstances, the constituent assembly passed the constitution (first amendment) act, 1951, by section 4 and 5 of which two new articles, namely, article 31-a and article 31-b were inserted into the constitution. a new schedule called the ninth ..... the madhya pradesh gazette of january 27, 1951, fixing march 31, 1951, as the date of vesting of all propriety rights in the state under section 3 of the act. a number of applications were made under article 226 of the constitution to the madhya pradesh high court by or on behalf of different persons variously ..... in berar. separate provision has been made for the determination of compensation payable to lessees of mines and minerals. under the provisions of section 218 of the central provinces land revenue act and section 44 of the berar land revenue code there is a presumption that all mines and minerals belong to the state and the proprietary .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 02 1952 (SC)

Raja Suriya Pal Singh Vs. the State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [1952]1SCR1056

..... all amounts ordered to be paid by an intermediary to the state government under section 27 and 28 of the united prove encumbered estates act, 1934, and all amounts due from him under the land improvement loans act, 1883, or the agricultural loans act, 1884, shall notwithstanding anything contained in the said enactments, become due forthwith and may, ..... government revenues, cesses and local rates, agricultural income-tax and costs of management. 53. before notification was issued by the state government under section 4 of the act, the intermediaries filed petitions under article 226 of the constitution praying inter alia, for the issue of a writ in the nature of mandamus ..... the constitution came into force, and have no connection what-ever with acquisition of properties. 43. mr. varma attacked the validity of section 340 of the act which enacts that - 'where any orders had been made........... or jurisdiction exercised under the provisions of the u. p. agriculture tenants (acquisition of .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //