Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: old Court: supreme court of india Page 94 of about 20,679 results (0.538 seconds)

Workers of the Industry Colliery, Dhanbad Vs. Management of the Indust ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1953SC88; (1953)ILLJ190SC; (1953)IMLJ431(SC); [1953]4SCR428

..... conciliation officer submitted his report on october 22, 1949, i.e., well within 14 days from the commencement of the conciliation proceedings as required by section 12(6) of the act. the report was sent through what has been called the routine official channel. admittedly, it was received in the office of the chief labour ..... 2, 1950, the regional labour commissioner (central), dhanbad, declared that the strike was illegal. being aggrieved by the aforesaid decision the appellants, under section 8(4) of the last mentioned act, preferred an appeal to the central government industrial tribunal at dhanbad which, however, also held that the strike was illegal and that the conclusions ..... facts are as follows :- 2. on october 13, 1949, the appellants through the secretary of their union gave a notice to the respondents, under section 22(1) of the industrial disputes act, 1947, that they proposed to call a one-day strike on the expiry of november 6, 1949, for the fulfilment of demands, 16 in .....

Wieman Vs. Updegraff

Court : US Supreme Court

..... were compelled to take the oath as written; that the appellants "and each of them, did not take and subscribe to the oath as provided in section 2 of the act and willfully refused to take that oath and by reason thereof the board of regents is enjoined from paying them, and their employment is terminated." in ..... restate, without argument, their position in the court below. [ footnote 3 ] testimony of j. edgar hoover, hearings before house committee on un-american activities on h.r. 1884 and h.r. 2122, 80th cong., 1st sess. 46. [ footnote 4 ] address by judge learned hand at the 86th convocation of the university of the state of ..... determined by the united states attorney general or other authorized public agency of the united states to be a communist front or subversive organization. . . ." the court upheld the act and enjoined the state officers from making further salary payments to appellants. the supreme court of oklahoma affirmed sub nom. board of regents v. updegraff, (1951). [ footnote .....

Chhotabhai Jethabai Patel and Co. Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [1953]4SCR476

..... proprietary rights in an estate or mahal vesting in a proprietor shall pass from him to and vest in the state. the consequences of vesting are given in section 4 of the act, and it is provided that the vesting will take place, notwithstanding anything contained in any contract, grant or document or in any other law for the time being ..... or forming part of the land, which are agreed to be severed before sale or under the contract of sale notwithstanding the definition of 'immovable property' in section 3(25) of the general clauses act of 1897. 22. in petition no. 232 of 1951 two sample agreements relating to tendu leaves are given as annexures a and b to the petitions. ..... by encumbrances. 28. in this view, it becomes unnecessary to consider the question as to when title in the property passes to the transferee. section 4, sub-section (3) of the indian sale of goods act which lays down that in the case of sale of future goods the contract amounts only to an agreement to sell does not seem to be .....

Commissioner of Income-tax, Madras Vs. K. Srinivasan and K. Gopalan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1953SC113; [1953]32ITR87(SC); (1953)IMLJ436(SC); [1953]4SCR486

..... july, 1938, and ending with 29th february, 1940 (a period of 20 months). 6. to decide this question it is necessary to set out the relevant provisions of the act. section 2(11), which defines 'previous year' in so far as it is relevant for purposes of this appeal is :- '(11)(a) the twelve months ending on the 31st day ..... period of twelve months adopted by the assessee for maintaining his accounts but different from the financial year and preceding a financial year. for purposes of the charging sections of the act unless otherwise provided for it is co-related to a year of assessment immediately following it, but it is not necessarily wedded to an assessment year in ..... period of eight months. this order was confirmed on appeal by the appellate assistant commissioner. on further appeal the tribunal held that on a proper construction of section 25(4) of the act, tax was not payable by the firm in respect of the profits and accounts of the business for the whole of the period from 1st july, 1938 .....

Firm Chhotabhai Jethabai Patel and Co. and ors. Vs. the State of Madhy ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1953SC108

..... are meant by encumbrances.21. in this view, it becomes unnecessary to consider the question as to when title in the property passes to the transferee. section 4, sub-section (3), sale of goods act, which lays down that in the case of sale of future goods the contract amounts only to an agreement to sell does not seem to be ..... or forming part of the land, which are agreed to be severed before sale or under the contract of sale, notwithstanding the definition of 'immovable property' in section 3 (25), general clauses act, 1897.18. in petition no. 232 of 1951 two sample agreements relating to tendu leaves are given as annexures a and b to the petition. they may ..... proprietary rights in an estate or mahal vesting in a proprietor shall pass from him to and vest in the stale. the consequences of vesting are given in section 4 of the act, and it is provided that the vesting will take place, notwithstanding anything contained in any contract, grant or document or in any other law for the time .....

Anglo-french Textile Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Madras

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1953SC105; (1953)IMLJ381; (1953)IMLJ385(SC); [1953]4SCR448; [1953]4SCR454

..... : 'whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case when an assessment has been made under section 23(1) of the indian income-tax act, determining the assessee company's income as 'nil' and when proceedings under section 34 were subsequently started to assess the income which the income-tax officer believed to have escaped assessment the assessee ..... gains or recompute the loss or depreciation allowance and that 'the provisions of this act shall, so far as may be, apply accordingly as if the notice were a notice were a notice issued under [sub-section (2) of section 22].' 13. this it is said attracts section 24(2). 14. we need not decide whether this contention is well founded, namely ..... can, we are of opinion that he cannot get what he asks for. there is no provision in the act which entitles the assessee to have a loss recorded or computed, unless something is to be done with the loss. thus, under section 24(1) a loss can be set off against an income, profit or gain and under sub .....

Kalipada Chakraborti and anr. Vs. Palani Bala Devi and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1953SC125; (1953)IMLJ597(SC); [1953]4SCR503

..... holder. it has not been and cannot be disputed that the same rule applies in the case of succession to shebaitship. reading article 124 of the limitation act along with section 2(8), the conclusion is irresistible that to defeat the title of the plaintiff under article 124 it is necessary to establish that the defendant had taken ..... could not be regarded as taking possession of the office adversely to the plaintiffs. he refers in this connection to the definition of 'plaintiff' in section 2(8) of the limitation act, where it is stated that plaintiff includes any person from or through whom a plaintiff derives his right to sue. in answer to this, it is ..... for recovery of possession of property held by a hindu widow in her restricted right. there were provisions only of a most general character contained in sections 12 and 16 of the act, under which limitation for suits to recover immovable and movable properties was 12 and 6 years respectively 'from the time the cause of action arose'. .....

Kalawati and anr. Vs. the State of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1953SC131; 1953CriLJ668; [1953]4SCR546

..... more than once, the government cannot have any right of appeal against an acquittal. if there is no punishment for the offence as a result of the prosecution, the sub-section has no application; and secondly, an appeal against an acquittal wherever such is provided by the procedure is in substance a continuation of the prosecution. mr. tarachand, who appeared ..... ranjit singh in the presence of a maid-servant near the well where she had gone to wash her clothes is rather incredible. for these reasons, we hesitate to act upon the confession of kalawati and find her guilty of aiding and abetting the offence of murder. 23. but there can scarcely be any doubt that she must have ..... two appellants developed an illicit intimacy with each other, and that they got rid of kanwar bikram singh, as he was cruel in his behavior to kalawati. the last act of ill-treatment is said to have been on the 6th july, when kanwar bikram slapped his wife. unable to endure the continued humiliation at the hands of her .....

Thakur Prasad Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1954SC30

..... judge, bilaspur, who tried the case acquitted two of the accused, namely, nandli and nirghani and found the remaining six accused including the appellant to be guilty of offence under section 302/149, penal code. the appellant thakurprasad was sentenced to death subject to confirmation by the high court and the remaining five to transportation for life.there was an appeal ..... s.r. das, j.1. the appellant thakurprasad along with seven other persons was sent up for trial on a charge under section 302/149, penal code, for having on 11-11-1950 between 9 and 10 a.m. at mouza paoni in tehsil mungeli of district bilaspur in the state of madhya .....

Bejoy Gopal Mukherji Vs. Pratul Chandra Ghose

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1953SC153; [1953]4SCR930

..... and possessing the same with great felicity down to your sons, grandsons etc. in succession.' 4. on 10th jeshta 1266 b.s. corresponding to 23rd may, 1859, a notice under sections 9 and 10 of regulation v of 1812 was issued by the then zemindars rani lalanmoni and raja purna chandra roy. it was addressed to 'mrs. cynthia mills junior, sarbarahkar ..... of the said lands according to the prevailing rate as per jamabandi at rs. 137-8-0 a year, fifteen days' notice is given to you under the provisions of sections 9 and 10 of regulation v of 1812 and you are hereby informed that within the said period you should appear before our zamindary cutchery and accept a pottah after .....