Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: old Court: supreme court of india Page 88 of about 20,679 results (1.917 seconds)

The State of Bombay and anr. Vs. F.N. Balsara

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : (1951)53BOMLR982; (1951)IIMLJ141; [1951]2SCR682

..... :- 'there is, in our view, no irreconcilable conflict here such as would necessitate recourse to the principle of federal supremacy laid down in section 100 of the constitution act. section 14-b does not purport to restrict or prohibit dealings in liquor in respect of its importation or exportation across the sea or land frontiers of ..... ] 40. with these principles in view, i have to decide whether article 14 of the constitution has been violated by the provisions contained in section 39 of the act before us. that section runs as follows :- 'the provincial government may, on such conditions as may be specified in the notification published in the official gazette, permit ..... as they tend to stop and restrict entry into or export from the province of bombay of goods of a particular class or description, the act contravenes section 297(1)(a). this section runs as follows :- 'no provincial legislature or government shall - (a) by virtue of the entry in the provincial legislative list relating to .....

Wilayat Khan and ors. Vs. the State of U.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1953SC122

..... sikandar khan, and they were acquitted. the state preferred an appeal against the acquittal of the high court. the acquittal was set aside and they were convicted under sections 147 and 302/149, penal code, and sentenced to two years' rigorous imprisonment and transportation for life respectively, the sentences being made to run concurrently. the appellants ..... gives the hour of report as 3 p. m. (1 p. m. was corrected into 3). investigation followed and the four accused named above were charged under sections 147, 149 and 302, penal code. in a carefully prepared judgment, the sessions judge held that it was improbable that the alleged eye witnesses really saw the occurrence, ..... in amanat ullah khan mentioning their names in his report when it is remembered that they belonged to his party, were co-accused with him in proceedings under section 107, criminal p. c., and were obviously his associates or henchmen, who would only be ready to say what was expected of them. much attention need .....

Dennis Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

..... and in american communications assn. v. douds, supra, we were called upon to decide the validity of 9(h) of the labor management relations act of 1947. that section required officials of unions which desired to avail themselves of the facilities of the national labor relations board to take oaths that they did not belong to ..... indictment unless they found that petitioners had the intent to "overthrow . . . the government of the united states by force and violence as speedily as circumstances would permit." section 2(a)(1) makes it unlawful "to knowingly or willfully advocate, . . . or teach the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying any ..... . [ footnote 2/11 ] see the testimony of the director of the federal bureau of investigation. hearings before the house committee on un-american activities, on h.r. 1884 and h.r. 2122, 80th cong., 1st sess., part 2, p. 37. [ footnote 2/12 ] report of the royal commission to investigate communication of secret and .....

Commissioner of Income Tax, Bombay Vs. Finlay Mills Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1951SC464; (1951)IIMLJ638(SC); [1952]1SCR11

..... case tenants of licensing premises by agreement with the landlord paid by instalment the monopoly value fixed by the licensing justices when grating the licence under section 14 of the licensing (consolidation) act, 1910. these were sought to be deducted as revenue expenditure but were disallowed by the court. lord greene m. r. first considered that ..... first time its trade marks which were not in use prior to the 25th february, 1937, is revenue expenditure and an allowable deduction under section 1092) (xv) of the indian income-tax act?' 2. the high court, following its previous decision and finding that the fact of the trade marks having come into use after the ..... not in use prior to the 25th february, 1937, as revenue expenditure and an allowable deduction out of its income for the said periods, under section 1092) (xv) of the indian income tax act. following the decision of the bombay high court in commissioner of income-tax, bombay v. the century spinning and weaving and : [1947]15itr105( .....

Collector of Bombay Vs. Municipal Corporation of the City of Bombay an ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1951SC469; (1952)54BOMLR122; [1952]1SCR43

..... respondent corporation in limitation of the right of the government in consequence of a specifies limit to assessment having been established and preserved within the meaning of section 8 of the act ii of 1876 so as to disentitle the government from assessing the land in question. the high court relied on the decision in kamalavahooji maharaj v. ..... parties knew the facts and neither was misled. there was no lying by and letting another run into a trap [per cotton l. j. in russell v. watts (1884) 25 ch. d. 559. the conduct of the parties was referable to the express agreement evidenced by the government resolution of 19th december, 1865, to make a grant of ..... exemption from assessment to land revenue with the result that the government's 'right to such property' (the subject of adverse possession) was 'extinguished' under section 28 of the limitation act. but the right to levy land revenue was no part of the government's right to the property. it is a prerogative right of the crown which .....

Sri Sankari Prasad Singh Deo Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and State of Bih ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : (1951)IIMLJ683(SC); [1952]1SCR89

..... such powers and this court had entertained appeals. the new articles, however, deprive the high courts as well as this court of the power of declaring the said acts unconstitutional, and thereby seek to make changes in ch. 4 part v and ch. 5 of part vi. it was therefore submitted that the newly inserted articles ..... the powers conferred on him by article 392 and is valid and constitutional. 24. a more plausible argument was advanced in support of the contention that the amendment act, is so far as it purpose to take away or abridge any of the fundamental rights, falls within the prohibition of article 13(2) which provides that ..... * * * *14. 392. (1) the president may, for the purpose of removing any difficulties, particularly in relation to the transition from the provisions of the government of india act, 1935, to the provisions of this constitution, by order direct that this constitution shall during such period as may be specified in the order, have effect subject to such adaptations .....

Sant Lal Mahton Vs. Kamala Prasad

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1951SC477; [1952]1SCR116

..... be determined exclusively with reference to the date on which the plaint is filed and the allegation made therein. the legislature has expressly declared in section 3 of the limitation act that whether defence of limitation be pleaded or not, the court is bound to dismiss a suit which is brought after the period provided there ..... point for our consideration is : whether the view taken by the subordinate judge is correct 9. it would be clear, we think, from the language of section 20 of the limitation act that to attract its operation two conditions are essential : first, the payment must be made within the prescribed period of limitation and secondly, it must be ..... was in the opinion of the learned judges, quite within time, and it was not necessary in these circumstances to call in aid the provision of section 20 of the limitation act for the purpose of extending the period of limitation. the learned judges held, however, that as the plaintiffs had not preferred any appeal or cross- .....

Thakur Rudreswari Prasad Sinha Vs. Srimati Rani Probhabhati and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1952SC1; [1952]1SCR64

..... their rights to resume and assess with revenue ghatwali lands appertaining to the zamindari of kharakpur. the government claimed the right under regulation i of 1793, section 8, clause (4), and contended that before the permanent settlement the zamindar used to appropriate the produce of the ghatwali lands in maintaining police establishments and ..... the present and future mutasaddis of affairs, chaudhuris, kanungos, zamindars and ghatwals of pargana danda sukhwara and it is urged that if captain browne had been acting on behalf of the zamindar of kharakpur, addressing the sanad to the zamindars would have been wholly inappropriate. the fact that the grant was to commence ..... been fixed, continue to receive the mukarrari rent from year to year and should not demand even a farthing in excess. they should treat this as peremptory and act as written herein. 18. dated the 25th shanwal, 17, corresponding to the 7th pus bangla, 1183 fasli. endorsement. 19. taluka kakwara, pargana danda sukhwara, .....

Commissioner of Police, Bombay Vs. Gordhandas Bhanji

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1952SC16; (1952)54BOMLR383; [1952]1SCR135

..... he runs of cancellation at any time under rule 250. 42. the next question is whether an order in the nature of a mandamus can issue under section 45 of the specific relief act. it is necessary to emphasise that the present case does not fall either under article 32(2) or article 226(1) of the constitution. we are ..... confined here to section 45 of the specific relief act. 43. the jurisdiction conferred by that section is very special in kind and is strictly limited in extent though the ambit of the powers exercisable within those limits is wide. among ..... government of bombay had the power to cancel a license once issued. that depends on a consideration of the rules. they are famed under section 22 (1) (f) (i) (g) and (h) of the city of bombay police act, 1902. they regulate the 'licensing, controlling, keeping and regulation' of places of public amusement in the city of bombay. rule 8 .....

Ram Kumar Das Vs. Jagadish Chandra Deb Dhabal Deb and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1952SC23; [1952]1SCR269

..... of his earlier suit by the lower appellate court, the high court definitely held that the defendant's tenancy was one from month to month under section 106, transfer of property act, and the only question left was whether payment to the receiver amounted to payment to the plaintiff himself. in this suit the defendant admitted in ..... the tenant held over after the second annual lease and consequently a tenancy from month to month came into existence in accordance with the provision of section 116, transfer of property act, even though no rent was demanded by the landlord after 1926. the controversy between the parties so far as this appeal is concerned, therefore, ..... new tenancy was created de hors the kabuliyat, and as the new tenancy was for building purposes, it was a tenancy from month to month under section 106, transfer of property act, terminable by fifteen days notice. as the notice was proper and sufficient, the trial judge decreed the plaintiff's suit. against this judgment, the .....