Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: old Court: mumbai Page 16 of about 19,977 results (0.849 seconds)

Walmikrao Jayaram Kajale Vs. Uttam Buvaji Raut and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : III(2004)ACC489; 2004ACJ2009; 2004(2)MhLj1069

..... amount of rs. 7,500/- (rs. seven thousand five hundred only) as compensation on account of no fault liability. as per the provision contained in section 110-(cc) (section 171 of act of 1988) motor accident claims tribunal has power to award interest on compensation from the date of application instead of date of award. it is clear that ..... high court and the matter challenging the order of the high court was before the apex court. before the apex court contention was raised that at the time when explosion and fire took place the petrol tank which was lying turtle was not suitable or fit for use on the road and, therefore, there was neither use of ..... co. ltd. and ors. v. khairunsi mirad hajarat mulla and ors., 1994 acj 929, in a claim for compensation of no fault liability under section 92-a (section 140 of 1988 act) contention was raised on behalf of insurance company disputing the liability to pay compensation under no fault liability on the ground that passenger was carried in goods .....

indo Berolina Industries Pvt. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

..... to chemical, petro-chemical, fine chemicals, organic chemicals, pharmaceutical, explosives etc. during the period impugned herein, supplied such consultancy as per agreements entered into by the customers of the appellant assessee under the central excise act herein. the disputed demands of duties were raised under section 11a along with proposals for penalty under section 11ac on the following grounds: a) the appellant company and ..... by the engineering company from the customers who were supplied with plant and machinery by the appellant assessee herein has to be considered for addition to the value under section 4 of the act to determine the duty liability on the plant and machinery items and cleared to such customers. (c) he did not hold the advances received by the appellants from .....

Sushilabai W/O Narayan Raut and ors. Vs. Navnit S/O Bhojraj Lakhotiya

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2005(1)ALLMR193; 2005(2)BomCR900; 2004(4)MhLj372

..... word that connotes anything that is injurious or obnoxious either to the community or to the members thereof. in the context of clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 13 of the act, emphasis is on the conduct of the tenant which is either by itself a nuisance or amounts to annoyance. the term suggests behaviour and has relation to ..... of smell but would not be dangerous to the life or injurious to the health of a neighbourer or to property. on the contrary, using the premises for storing explosives may not cause any annoyance or offence to the sense of sight, smell or hearing but would be dangerous to the life or injurious to the health of neighbourer ..... their is no statutory definition of word 'nuisance or annoyance' has observed thus :--'13. there are no statutory definitions of 'nuisance' or 'annoyance' which under section 13(1)(c) of the act constitute a ground for recovery of possession by landlord of a premises in the occupation of a tenant. in the case with which we are concerned, the .....

Mohammad Hanif Abdul Masjid Isane and ors. Vs. Juned Mohammad Jalal an ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2004(4)ALLMR843; 2005(1)BomCR613; 2005(1)MhLj233

..... corrigendum though drafted or prepared by the taluka inspector, land records, mahad but it has not yet been published in the official gazette following provision of section 32 of the act. the power to issue such corrigendum is with the settlement commissioner. the taluka inspector has no authority even to prepare draft corrigendum. even, the government ..... patrak (corrigendum) so as to delete the names of the appellants. she submits that on the basis of manipulated records, appellant no. 1 got licence of explosive on 17th january, 1995 in his name and from that date he was doing business of stone quarrying in the suit property. in her submission, because of ..... the village in question has not been modified. it has been prepared by the taluka inspector of the land record. he further submits that under section 32 of the act authority to issue shuddhi patrak (corrigendum) is with the settlement commissioner and not with the taluka inspector. he further submits that even the government resolution .....

Morarjee Goculdas Spg. and Wvg. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in : (2005)98TTJ(Mum.)201

..... concern dealing with such cylinders was required to be registered under the indian explosives act, but the assessee-company did not meet the requirement of indian explosives act. shri mahesh gupta, in fact, expressed his ignorance about the provisions of explosives act. the statement of shri ajay piramal, the chairman of the assessee-company ..... issues raised therein are based on transactions which, by no stretch of imagination can be said to be undisclosed transactions falling under section 158b of the it act, since the transactions in question were disclosed in returns which were the subject-matter of regular assessment. the same ought to have ..... hyderabad, on 12th march, 1997 submitted that npl did not enter into lease transaction with the assessee-company. during the course of proceedings under section 158bc, the assessee was confronted with these findings.the assessee relied upon the elaborate documentation which included inspection certificates, invoices, board resolution of lessees, .....

Reliance Industries Limited Vs. State of Maharashtra Through Inspector ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2005(3)MhLj40

..... storage of foodgrains within the prescribed limits under a bonafide belief that he could legally do so. he did not, therefore, intentionally contravene the provisions of section 7 of the said act. in this view of the matter, the supreme court set aside the high court's order convicting the appellant.25. mr. desai laid stress on ..... a detailed application form. according to the petitioner along with the said application rpl also enclosed, inter alia, the license issued by the chief controller of explosives in favour of iotl to import and store petroleum in the licensed premises, and the certificate of registration issued by the sales tax department, under the bombay sales ..... is not the case here.26. reliance was also placed on murarilal's case (supra). in that case the appellant was prosecuted for contravention of section 7 of the said act for carrying on his business without licence. he approached the high court for quashing the proceeding. he was successful in his effort. the undisputed facts .....

The Morarjee Goculdas Spg. and Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax,

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

..... concern dealing with such cylinders was required to be registered under the indian explosives act, but the assessee company did not meet the requirement of indian explosives act. shri mahesh gupta, in fact, expressed his ignorance about the provisions of explosives act. the statement of shri ajay piramal, the chairman of the assessee company ..... these reasons, the learned assessing officer could not hold the claim of depreciation as falling under "undisclosed income" within the meaning of section 158b(b) of the act. for the purpose of assessing income disclosed by the assessee from some lease transactions, the learned assessing officer treated the transactions as properly ..... , and blank cheques only to accommodate the request made by the other parties who promised payment to them. during the course of proceedings under section 158bc, the learned assessing officer confronted the assessee company with the findings of the investigation wing at coimbatore. in his detailed reply, the assessee .....

Yadu Sambhaji More Vs. Shivaji Dayanu Patil and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : IV(2005)ACC324; 2005ACJ1282; 2005(4)BomCR698

..... was of the view that the explosion and the fire took place after about four hours, has no connection whatsoever with the accident which took place at 3 a.m. ..... the use of motor vehicle' contained in section 92-a of the motor vehicles act, 1939, when the petitioners in that matter filed an application for no fault liability under section 92-a. all those claim petitions were decided by the same tribunal and the applications were dismissed on the ground that the explosion could not be said to be an ..... accident arising out of the use of the petrol tanker and, therefore, provisions of section 92-a of the act were not attracted. the tribunal .....

Pedru Mozes Fernandes Vs. National Textile Corporation (S.M.) Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2006(2)BomCR403; [2005(107)FLR660]; 2005(4)MhLj199

..... in such cases is : did the individual worker, who has to suffer the penalty, actively involve himself or did he merely remain quiescent non-worker, during the explosive period? it must be remembered, for example, that not reporting for work and remaining at home for fear or vengeance in a para violent situation or, if the ..... held that the approach notice that was preferred by the petitioner was barred by limitation and that it was not preferred within the period stipulated in section 42(4) of the act. the petitioner has challenged the judgment and order of the industrial court in these proceedings under article 226 of the constitution.2. the petitioner joined ..... to enter the premises of the mill. according to the workmen their services had never been terminated and in january, 1993 they issued approach notices under section 42(4) of the act. the labour court upheld the legality of the approach letters. in appeal, the industrial court held that those letters were not barred by limitation. in .....

Shamrao Vishnu Kunjir Vs. Suresh Vishnu Kunjir and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR2005Bom294; 2005(3)ALLMR622; 2005(4)BomCR544; 2005(3)MhLj1071

..... before it or summoned to appear before it. the earlier procedure resulted in the trial being inordinately delayed and was one of the main reasons for the docket explosion in the courts. the amendment seeks to obviate the same by permitting examination to be on affidavit instead of the examination-in-chief being recorded by the court ..... court may direct that the evidence of any witness shall be recorded by the court an the presence and under the personal direction and superintendence of the judge.'this act of 1999 also provided for addition of another rule after rule 18, rule 19 which reads as under :-'19. power to get statement recorded on commission. - ..... in attendance shall be taken orally in open court in the presence and under the personal direction and superintendence of the judge.'by the code of civil procedure (amendment) act, 1999 the said rule was sought to be substituted. the relevant portion of which reads as under :-'4. recording of evidence by commissioner. - (1) in every .....