Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: old Court: mumbai Page 14 of about 19,977 results (0.123 seconds)

Ship Scrap Traders and ors. Vs. Cit and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (2001)168CTR(Bom)489

..... regulation, 2000 made it compulsory for all the ship-breaking units to comply with all requirements applicable to the industrial units under the factories act, pollution control board regulations, and explosive regulations. that is how the ship-breaking activity is understood and carried out in the country treating it as an 'industrial undertaking'.(d ..... hereinafter has been referred to us for our opinion, whereas, in some cases the assessees have invoked appellate jurisdiction of this court under section 260a of the act to challenge the judgments of the tribunal delivered in various appeals. all the cases were heard together and are being disposed of by this ..... the construction of a dam . . . . . . . . .'the supreme court also expressed the view that the expressions used in the relevant clause of section 32a must be understood in its normal connotation and the according to commercial usage. viewed from that standpoint and the legislative history of the provisions, their lordships held that .....

Reliance Industrial Infrastructure Ltd. Vs. Jt. Cit

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (2002)75TTJ(Mumbai)606

..... of his income-tax assessment.33. in keshav mills ltd. v. cit , the hon'ble supreme court held that the provisions of section 13 of 1922 act (corresponding to section 145 of 1961 act) was compulsory on the income tax authorities and imposed upon them an obligation to accept the method of accounting regularly adopted by the assessee ..... writing his books of accounts and yet another method or system of accounting for the return of income filed by him. the provisions of section 13 of 1922 act and section 145 of 1961 act and various judgments of the courts in india give clear legal recognition to the fact that unlike laws of physics, there could be more ..... s name as the sole loss payee for its full replacement value with such insurer as may be approved by the lessor against all reasonable risks, including fire, riot, explosion, tempest, flood, earthquake, strike, storm, malicious damage, theft, civil commotion, war and other such risks including third party risks as the lessor may require and pay .....

Reliance Industrial Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

..... .33. in keshav mills ltd. v. cit (1953) 23 itr 230 (sc), the hon'ble supreme court held that the provisions of section 13 of 1922 act (corresponding to section 145 of 1961 act) was compulsory on the it authorities and imposed upon them an obligation to accept the method of accounting regularly adopted by the assessee except in ..... writing his books of accounts and yet another method or system of accounting for the return of income filed by him. the provisions of section 13 of 1922 act and section 145 of 1961 act and various judgments of the courts in india give clear legal recognition to the fact that unlike laws of physics, there could be more ..... s name as the sole loss payee for its full replacement value with such insurer as may be approved by the lessor against all reasonable risks, including fire, 'riot, explosion, tempest, flood, earthquake, strike, storm, malicious damage, theft, civil commotion, war and other such risks including third party risks as the lessor may require and pay all .....

Herbertsons Ltd. Vs. Dy. Cit

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (2004)87TTJ(Mumbai)840

..... the case of swadesh cotton mills co. ltd. v. cit (supra), in chamundi hotels (p) ltd. v. cit : [1987]166itr683(kar) and in mining machinery explosive ltd. v. cit (supra) are general in nature and neither in favour nor against the department.19. the learned departmental representative contended that words 'customers and others' in ..... the decision in cit v. birla bros. (p) ltd. : [1970]77itr751(sc) . in cit v. l.k. dalmiya : [1994]207itr89(cal) and in mining machinery explosive (p) ltd. v. cit : [1993]202itr710(cal) . the learned departmental representative contended that furnishing of 8 guarantees over a period of time would not bring about sufficient volume and ..... v. cit : [1973]87itr429(sc) and other decisions. accordingly, the authorities below held that the expenditure is not allowable under section 28 or under section 37(1) or under section 57 of the income tax act. the expenditure was held as capital in nature as well as not for the purposes of business.12. before us, the learned .....

Laxmikant Shankarlal Sarda Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2002BomCR(Cri)170; 2002CriLJ1040; 2002(2)MhLj471

..... course of investigation into an offence or suspected offence as provided under the provisions of criminal procedure code and when such search is completed at that stage section 50 of the ndps act would not be attracted and the question of complying with the requirements thereunder would not arise. however, if during such search or arrest there ..... could have been fatal and as such the vehicle was carried in the premises of ramsons casting, midc which is officially declared as safe area by the explosives department and accordingly the said tanker was stationed in the premises of ramsons casting. according to the applicant at about 8 p.m. psi gorhe of the ..... upon by the prosecution, in other proceedings, against an accused, notwithstanding the recovery of that material during an illegal search.(8) a presumption under section 54 of the act can only be raised after prosecution has established that the accused was found to be in possession of the contraband in a search conducted in accordance .....

S.N. Thapa and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Mumbai

Reported in : (2003)(1)SLJ201CAT

..... the conspiracy to allow smuggling of items into the country and it was immaterial whether they knew that they were explosive items or anything else. they were posted in the customs (preventive) section in the concerned areas where the contraband articles were smuggled into the state during the relevant period. he has, ..... you were legally bound to prevent it and that you thereby committed an offence punishable under section 3(3) of tada (p) act 1987 and within my cognizance.43. similarly, ..... mushtaq @ ibrahim @ tiger abdul razak memon and their associates for the purpose of committing terrorist acts by your non-interference in spite of the fact that you had specific information and knowledge that arms, ammunition and explosives are being smuggled into the country by terrorists and as additional collector of customs, (preventive), .....

Shirish Finance and Investment (P.) Ltd. Vs. M. Sreenivasulu Reddy

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2002(1)BomCR419

..... and to regulate, the securities market, and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. the powers and functions of the board have been enumerated in section 11 of the act. the act casts a duty on the board to protect the interests of investors in securities and to promote the development of, and to regulate, the securities ..... was reiterated in tej prakash s. dangi v. coromandal pharmaceuticals ltd. . the learned judge reached his conclusion after referring to the authorities on the subject, including avanthi explosives (p.) ltd.'s case (supra), 116. this brings us to a consideration of the judgment of the supreme court in public passenger services ltd.'s case ( ..... persuasive value, and he would adopt them as his argument, apart from relying upon the earlier decisions of this court noticed in the judgment. 115. in avanthi explosives (p.) ltd. v. principle subordinate judge , a question arose in the writ petition as to the jurisdiction of the civil court to entertain a civil suit .....

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Sanjay Sampatrao Gaikwad Etc.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2004ACJ434; AIR2002Bom436; 2002(6)BomCR391

..... , eastern railway v. jshna kanhar, there was no case of untoward incident of fall of the passenger from the running train. it is squarely covered by section 124a of act which covers such a situation. shri jha has drawn support from another judgment of kerala high court, reported in : air1997ker321 , union of india v. aleykutty ..... the celebrated work the learned author has pointed out that 'over the years rylands v. fletcher has been applied to a remarkable variety of things: fire, gas, explosions, electricity, oil, noxious fumes, colliery spoil, rusty wire from a decayed fence, vibrations, poisonous vegetation.'he has elaborated seven defences recognised in common law against action ..... have to test whether the alleged incident of stone throwing by an outsider at the train injuring the passengers amounts to an untoward incident under section 123c of the act. in the common understanding it would be said that it is an untoward incident. the legislature was wry well aware of the every kind .....

Blue Star Workers Union Vs. Blue Star Ltd. and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (2002)IIILLJ477Bom

..... non- existent. i am therefore, not able to agree with the submissions of shri deshmukh that the notice of lock-out was in contravention of section 24(2) of the act for want of true, genuine, relevant and rational reasons in existence. having held that the respondent company has stated reasons exhaustively in the notice of ..... by the objective material on record. from the entire material on record one cannot escape to draw an inference that the overall situation in the company had become explosive. there was industrial unrest and disturbance in the company. there appears to be several anti-production activities resorted to by the workmen at different points of time ..... on the notice board but even a copy was forwarded to the union and the other authorities. shri rele submitted that the situation in the factory was explosive and there was no other alternative left with the company but to suspend the operations till normalcy was restored by the employees. according to the learned counsel, .....

Environsare Foundation Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Through Secretary and ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2003(2)BomCR519

..... energy & environment department. the 3rd respondent is the member-secretary of the maharashtra pollution control board (m.p.c.b.). the 4th respondent is the chief controller of explosives (c.c.o.e.). respondent no. 5 is the chairman of the board of trustees of j.n.p.t. the 6th respondent is the directorate of industrial ..... the declaration of coastal stretches as c.r.z. and imposing restrictions on industries, operations and processes in the c.r.z. under section 3(1) and section 3(2)(v) of the environment (protection) act, 1986 and after considering the objections, in exercise of its powers under rule 5(3)(d), it had issued the particular notification on ..... for the purposes of granting consent under the water (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1974. as far as the maps for the particular pipeline are concerned, the state government has also clearly stated that it has no objection. the authority dealing with explosives i.e. c.c.o.e. has also given its approval. two area authorities .....