Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: old Court: delhi Year: 2006 Page 30 of about 411 results (0.327 seconds)

Sep 11 2006 (HC)

The Management of Delhi Transport Corporation Vs. Suraj Bhan and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-11-2006

Reported in : 133(2006)DLT195; [2006(111)FLR768]

..... days in preceding year. i consider that tribunal misdirected itself by not considering the fact whether the respondent was entitled to benefit under sections 25f and 25n in view of section 25b of the act.9. admittedly, the respondent was a retainer-crew-conductor, he was employed temporarily till the period, the petitioner employed regular conductors, ..... labour court had failed to appreciate that the respondent workman was a conductor appointed on daily wages and his termination was not retrenchment under sections 25f and 25n of industrial dispute act. it is also submitted that vide order dated 23.7.1998 appointment has been offered to the respondent workman after passing of impugned ..... he is not in the requirement of employment as a daily wager.7. in order to apply section 25f and 25n, it is necessary that a workman should be covered by definition of 25b of the industrial dispute act. section 25b reads as under:[definition of continuous service - for the purposes of this chapter,-(1) a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 11 2006 (HC)

Shri Sai Bhakta Samaj (Regd.) Vs. Shri Durga Prasad and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-11-2006

Reported in : 133(2006)DLT132; [2006(111)FLR814]

..... years.6. another factor which strikes the mind is that one of the workman is a pujari. he has been held as a workman unmindful of section 2(s) of i.d. act. section 2(s) of the act reads as under:(s) 'workman' means any person (including an apprentice) employed in any industry to do any manual, unskilled, skilled, technical, operational, clerical ..... of religious hymens and bhajans and artieswhich he has to recite in the temple. this work cannot be considered by any stretch of imagination a work specified in section 2(s) of the act. the tribunal has misdirected itself by considering a pujari as a workman. the other workman was working as a chowkidar. since the activities of the petitioner were ..... in its order how pujari has been considered as a workman. a pujari in a temple cannot be workman. only those persons who are covered under the definition of section 2(s) of the act can be described as workman. in h.r. anyathuaya 1994 (11) clr 552, supreme court held that in order to be covered under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 11 2006 (HC)

Hasan Ali Vs. Akbari Begum @ Akbari Hajjan

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-11-2006

Reported in : 133(2006)DLT26

..... was revoked before institution of the suit for mandatory injunction and the suit was filed without unreasonable delay after termination of the license. thereforee, section 7(v) of the court fee act was not attracted and since the relief for grant of injunction was discretionary and even if there was some delay, attempt should be made to ..... in the present suit also, before this court) was whether a suit for possession should have been filed instead of a suit for mandatory injunction under section 55 of the specific relief act. the punjab high court (delhi bench) referred to the judgment titled prabirendra nath v. narendra nath reported in : air1958cal179 in which the owner had ..... license, it was opined that the claim in substance was for possession and the valuation for the purposes of court fee was governed by section 7(v) of the court fee act and the plaintiff could not put his own valuation. the high court opined that the learned munsif had not exercised his jurisdiction illegally or .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 12 2006 (HC)

The Workmen of Northern Railway Zonal Training School Mess Canteen Kar ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-12-2006

Reported in : 133(2006)DLT18

..... iiillj378sc noticed the distinction between such classes of workmen as domestic servants who render personal service to their masters from those covered by the definition in section 2(j) of the industrial dispute act. it is made clear that if literally interpreted these words are of very wide amplitude and it cannot be suggested that in their sweep it ..... a casual way would fall outside the definition. that is how this court dealt with this aspect of the matter. the whole purpose of the industrial disputes act is to focus on resolution of industrial disputes and the regulation will not meddle with every little carpenter or a blacksmith, a cobbler or a cycle repairer who ..... training school, chandausi, moradabad was an 'industry' or not and if the employees working in the mess of the training school were covered under the industrial dispute act.3. it is undisputed fact that the trainees of the railway zonal training school formed a committee in order to run the mess where they took meals. the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 13 2006 (HC)

Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. Vs. Schlumberger Asia Services Lt ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-13-2006

Reported in : 2006(3)ARBLR610(Delhi); 2006(91)DRJ370

..... company in the area of operation.6.5 transportation charges:all actual costs incurred for transportation of contractors units tools, equipment, spare parts, supplies and explosives, when imported into the country for the commissions exclusive service from contractors point of origin i.e. houston, dubai, singapore, etc. to the contractors ..... or an arbitral tribunal ignores a well recognized principle of interpretation, such an award would be against public policy within the meaning of section 34 of the arbitration and conciliation act 1996, as understood and interpreted in saw pipes case (supra), thus calling for interference.48. the fundamental error committed by the majority ..... having identified my adjudicatory power to deal with the issue at hand in relation to the jurisdiction which i am exercising under section 34 of the arbitration and conciliation act 1996 and additionally noting the process of reasoning adopted by the majority and the dissenting opinion, i think my first and foremost .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 13 2006 (HC)

Delhi Cooperative Tribunal Vs. A.C. Aggarwal

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-13-2006

Reported in : 2006(91)DRJ348

..... is obvious from a reading of the aforesaid provision that if there is bar in law, the plaint can be rejected. there is clear bar under section 78(7) of the societies act which would make the plaint liable to be rejected.15. there is another important aspect urged by learned counsel for the petitioner though the plea of ..... .4. the civil judge took cognizance of the suit and issued summons. the presiding officer of the tribunal made a reference to this court under section 15(2) of the contempt of court act, 1971. the suit filed by the respondent also was dismissed in default on 02.02.2001. in the contempt matter, this court noticed the ..... delhi officers cooperative house building society limited along with interest.3. the respondent aggrieved by the same filed two appeals under section 76 of the delhi cooperative societies act, 1972 (herein-after referred to as the 'societies act') in respect of the two cases decided in terms of the award. these petitions were dismissed in limine by sh. madan .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 13 2006 (HC)

Motor and General Finance Ltd. Vs. Mr. Gautam Roy and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-13-2006

Reported in : 133(2006)DLT103

..... court, of course, has taken a contrary view. it cannot be, thus, said that this order would be an appealable order within the meaning of section 38 of the said act.29. insofar as the exercise of revisionary jurisdiction is concerned, the views expressed in raj kumar kapoors case (supra) were in the context of the rent ..... 26. it was, thus, submitted that the only remedy of the petitioner was to file an appeal before the tribunal under section 38 of the said act. learned counsel also emphasized that sub-section (2) of section 115 of the code bars this court from reversing an order in which an appeal lies to a subordinate court or to ..... .10. learned counsel for the petitioner also emphasized another aspect arising from the nature of proceedings in the present case. the eviction petition was filed under section 14 of the said act and insofar as the allegation of sub- letting is concerned, the relevant provision is as under:14. protection of tenant against eviction1) notwithstanding anything to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 13 2006 (HC)

Raj Gariha Vishram Sadan Vs. Vijay Kate

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-13-2006

Reported in : (2007)2LLJ555Del

..... been adjusted pursuant to the second impugned order dated 27.9.2005, the said amount should be repaid to the workman by adding it to the monthly payments under section 17b id act.23. accordingly, this appeal is partly allowed. the order dated 27.9.2005 passed by the learned single judge in cm no. 10653/2005 is set aside. the ..... it may be useful to recapitulate where the law stands at present in relation to the payment of wages to a workman under section 17b of the id act.8. section 17-b of the i.d. act reads as under:section 17-b payment of full wages to workman pending proceedings in higher courts: where in any case a labour court, tribunal or national ..... date of the termination of his services. before us, the appellant did not dispute the entitlement of the respondent workman to the wages last drawn in terms of section 17b of the id act. in fact in the subsequent application cm no 10653 of 2005 filed by it before the learned single judge, the appellant sought the modification of the first .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 13 2006 (TRI)

Munish Kumar S/O Late Shri Om Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Decided on : Sep-13-2006

..... be given before us cannot be entertained as no foundation thereof was laid before the tribunal. it was open to the first respondent to make proper application under section 21(3) of the act for condonation of delay and having not done so, he cannot be permitted to take up such contention at this late stage. in our opinion, the o.a ..... before the tribunal after the expiry of three years could not have been admitted and disposed of on merits in view of the statutory provision contained in section 21(1) of the administrative tribunals act, 1985.moreover, applicant suppressed the order dated 23.7.2002. therefore, seeing from both the angles, definitely this o.a. is liable to be dismissed on this .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 14 2006 (HC)

Shehzad Vs. State (Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-14-2006

Reported in : 2006(91)DRJ239

..... 26.04.2005 which would clearly make him a juvenile within the meaning of the juvenile justice (care and protection of children) act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as the said act) inasmuch as the word 'juvenile' has been defined in section 2(k) as a person who has not completed the 18th year of age,3. i have heard the learned counsel for ..... apparent that the age of the petitioner would be less then 18 years and, he would, therefore, fall within the definition of the word 'juvenile' as appearing in the said act.4. however, the learned additional sessions judge thought otherwise and came to the following conclusion:7. shabnam and safiq detailed that date of birth of shehzad was recorded in school .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //