Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: old Court: delhi Year: 2006 Page 27 of about 411 results (0.096 seconds)

Gayatri Agarwal Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2007(95)DRJ236

..... also seized by the customs officer from your premises, for which you could not give any explanationn as evident from the statement dated 03.08.2004 recorded under section 108 of customs act, 1962.47. on verification of the contents of cdfs, it was noticed that these showed the details of the flight nos. and date of arrival of the ..... and dates mentioned in cdfs. a statement of shri vitaly. m. vasyutkin, general manager, aeroflot russian airlines, new delhi, was recorded on 15.09.2004 under section 37 of foreign exchange management act, 1999 and a list of incoming passengers who visited india by su flight as mentioned on the cdf forms were shown to him. in his reply dated 05th ..... in aforesaid illegal activities, a complaint was filed in the court of addl. chief metropolitan magistrate, new delhi on 1/10/04 for the offences under sections 132/135 of the customs act. the detenu was granted bail by this court on 19/01/05. on 30/5/05 show cause notice was issued to him by the customs department .....

international Building and Furnishing Company (Cal) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Indi ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2006(2)CTLJ287(Del)

..... by way of penalty, party who has committed the breach is required to pay such compensation and that is what is provided in section 73 of the contract act.(3) section 74 is to be read along with section 73 and, thereforee, in every case of breach of contract, the person aggrieved by the breach is not required to prove actual ..... such breach is entitled to receive compensation for any loss which naturally arises in the usual course of things from such breach.69. thereafter in relation to sections 73 and 74 of the contract act and the decisions reported as : air1962sc1314 , chunilal mehta v. century spinning and mfg. co. : [1964]1scr515 , fateh chand v. balkishan dass : [1970]1scr928 , maula ..... the plaintiff cannot insist on abandoning the contract and yet recover the deposit. as observed by fry l.j. in the decision reported as hove v. smit l.r. (1884) ch.d. 89 of the report:money paid as a deposit must, i conceive be paid on same terms implied or expressed. in this case no terms are expressed .....

Pwd Thr. Dy. Dir. Horticulture Vs. Satya Pal

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 132(2006)DLT571

..... haryana roadways v. rudhan singh : (2005)iiillj4sc .6. in order to appreciate this contention we may first examine the relevant provisions of the id act. section 2(oo)(bb) of the id act reads as under:[(oo) 'retrenchment' means the termination by the employer of the service of a workman for any reason whatsoever, otherwise than as a ..... fact, he worked continuously for three years from 30.8.1990 to 13.9.1993. (b) his services were terminated without notice, in violation of section 25-f of the act. 5. mr. ahmed, the learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the respondent workman was engaged on a work order basis for short periods of two ..... government industrial tribunal (`tribunal') holding that the termination of the services of the respondent was illegal as it was done without complying with section 25-f of the industrial disputes act, 1947 ('i.d. act'). the tribunal had recorded the following findings:from the evidence on record, i find that the workman worked continuously w.e.f. .....

Ge Capital Services India Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in : (2007)106TTJ(Delhi)65

..... then such replacement cannot be regarded as current repairs. the replacement may amount to renovation or repairs which may or may not be entitled to deduction under section 37 of the act but such an expense has been rightly held by the tribunal as not being allowable as deduction under the said head 'current repairs'.it would be seen that ..... parts on account of wear and tear over a number of years would amount to renovation or repairs which may or may not be entitled to deduction under section 37 of the act. we find the case of the assessee before us still inferior inasmuch as expenditure is neither on current repairs nor on account of renovation and repairs being ..... .16th march, 2006 in ita no. 856/mad/2005 reported at (2006) 102 ttj (chennai)(sb) 1ed. according to which after deletion of second proviso to section 43b by the finance act, 2003 w.e.f. 1st april, 2004, it should be treated that second proviso was never on the statute book.respectfully following the decision of special bench, we .....

Dr. Lal Path Labs and Patient Vs. C.C.E., Ludhiana

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (2006)(111)ECC616

..... activity carried out by the appellant amounts to promotion or marketing of service provided by the client m/s dr. lal pathlabs, new delhi and is covered under section 65(19)(ii) of the act as defined therein during the relevant period". the point made is that the finding is contrary to the factual position noted. the contention is that a service .....

The Asst. Commissioner of Vs. Shri Hiromi Hirose, Japan

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in : (2008)111ITD9(Delhi)

..... appeal before us.4.1 while opening the case, the learned dr pointed out that the question to be decided is whether the provisions contained in section 9(1)(ii) or section 5(1)(b) of the act are applicable in the instant case or not. this is a mixed question of law and facts. therefore, it will have to be carefully examined ..... before the learned cit(a). it was represented before him that the assessee received salary from nhk for his assignment to south asia region. the provision of section 5(1)(c) of the act were not applicable because his status was nor and the salary was not received from a business or a profession controlled or set up in india. the provision ..... the case and in law, the learned cit(a) erred in holding that salary and bonus received by the assessee outside india is not taxable in india under section 5(1)(c) of the it act, specially when as per terms of employment, his office was based in new delhi and he was responsible to delhi office even though, he rendered services outside .....

Sh. V.K. Puri Vs. Cbi

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 133(2006)DLT521

..... account for the same. if he fails to account for, he commits misconduct. thereforee, as in a prosecution laid under section 5(1)(e) of the act [equivalent to section 13(1)(e) of 1988 act], a public servant is liable to punishment. the need to make this misconduct expressly a part of enumerated items of misconduct ..... servant cannot satisfactorily account for. thus, pecuniary resources or property disproportionate to his known sources of income is a criminal misconduct. in the 1988 act, an explanationn has been added to section 13(1)(e) to explain that 'known sources of income' means income received from any lawful source and such receipt has been intimated in ..... although under the code under similar circumstances of misappropriation or breach of trust different courts may have jurisdiction, but, under the prevention of corruption act, in respect of the offences under section 13(1)(c) and 13(1)(d) thereof, only the court of the special judge for the areas within which the offence was committed .....

Shri Lokender Pal Ex Head Vs. Government of Nct of Delhi Through

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Reported in : (2007)(2)SLJ225CAT

..... to aiims, new delhi in a jail ambulance, who was involved in several cases of murder and attempt to murder and was facing an externment proceeding under section 47 of delhi police act. after check up of utp virender chopra, two constables waited for hc lokender pal and after search, found both hc lokender pal and constable sanjay singh ..... by the under trial, that resulted in the escape of the dreaded criminal, against whom serious criminal cases were pending, apart from the externment proceedings under section 47 of the delhi police act. therefore, in the departmental enquiry, it is the misconduct of the applicants, which is going to be looked into. we do not want to comment ..... e.r. 708, 718f. also see state of orissa v. the titaghur paper mills co. ltd. opinion that in view of the clear provisions of section 7(2) of the criminal law arnendment act, 1952 and articles 14 and 21 of the constitution, these directions were legally wrongin state of bihar v. kalika kuer @ kalika singh and ors., .....

Chunni Lal Proprietor C.L. Constructions Company Vs. Rpg Home Finance ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 134(2006)DLT212

..... arbitrator or the arbitral tribunal during the course of the arbitration proceedings and the parties could approach the court only in terms of section 37 of the act or in terms of section 34 of the act.(vii) since an order passed by the chief justice of the high court or by the designated judge of that court is a ..... justice of the judge designated would be entitled to seek the opinion of an institution in the matter of nominating an arbitrator qualified in terms of section 11(8) of the act if the need arises but the order appointing the arbitrator could only be that of the chief justice or the judge designate.(v) designation of a ..... the parties all throughout the period when construction was being carried out. this question is, thereforee, left to be definitivelydecided by the arbitrator as envisaged in section 16 of the act. even though similar objection as to the non-existence of an arbitration clause had been raised in rodemadan india limited v. international trade expo centre limited 2006 .....

Ajay Yadav, Grade-ii/Asstt. Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi, Through

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... have been jointly made accused along with one shri v.k. aggarwal in fir no. 48/96 dated 14.09.1996 under sections 7 and 13 of the prevention of corruption act, 1988 read with section 120-b of indian penal code on the ground that shri aggarwal demanded and accepted rs. 50,000/- as illegal gratification from ..... one ramesh chand on 16.9.1996 for not initiating action on the complaint of irregularities at the fair price shop and applicants who were then in position were working in the food and supplies department have acted ..... accused in case of availability of additional evidence whereas in acquittal which has attained finality there cannot be a second prosecution or conviction by way of implication of section 300 cr.p.c.14. in such view of the matter the contentions raised by applicants as to their being absolved from disciplinary jurisdiction on discharge cannot .....