Court : US Supreme Court
Decided on : Feb-21-1973
..... virginia constitution now allows for the first time special or local legislation for counties as well as for cities. revised constitution of virginia, article vii, section 2. those provisions now permit counties the constitutional flexibility formerly afforded only to cities in providing services for their citizens." brief for appellant commonwealth of virginia ..... virginia 117 (1969): "there is no reason to make any distinction between general assembly and congressional apportionment. for this reason, the proposed section [art. ii, 6] combines the provisions of sections 43 and 55 so that a common set of principles applies to apportionment of legislative seats and congressional seats." [ footnote 2/10 ] ..... immediately and not be subject to the limitations contained in article iv, section 13, of this constitution." [ footnote 2 ] va.code. ann. 24.1-12.1 (supp. 1972). [ footnote 3 ] va.code ann. 24.1-14.1, as amended by c. 246, acts of assembly, june 14, 1971. [ footnote 4 ] the reapportionment .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : US Supreme Court
Decided on : Jan-10-1973
..... months." "b. upon the failure of a bankrupt . . . to pay any installment as ordered, the court may dismiss the proceeding for failure to pay costs as provided in section 59, sub. g. of the act. . . . " "c. no proceedings upon the discharge of a bankrupt . . . shall be instituted until the filing fees are paid in full." [ footnote 4 ] "any court ..... denied, 402 u.s. 966 (1971). pursuant to 28 u.s.c. 1252, the government appealed. we noted probable jurisdiction. 405 u.s. 915 (1972). i section 14 (b)(2) of the bankruptcy act, 11 u.s.c. 32(b)(2), provides that, upon the expiration of the time fixed by the court for filing of objections, "the court shall discharge ..... bankruptcy and states that, "in the case of a dismissal for failure to pay the costs," notice to creditors shall not be required. three separate sections of the page 409 u. s. 436 act thus contemplate the imposition of fees and condition a discharge upon payment of those fees. three charges are imposed: $37 for the referee's salary .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : US Supreme Court
Decided on : Jun-21-1973
..... also relied on 8 cfr 287.1, which, in relevant part, provides: "(a)(2) reasonable distance. the term 'reasonable distance,' as used in section 287(a)(3) of the act, means within 100 air miles from any external boundary of the united states or any shorter distance which may be fixed by the district director, or, so ..... automobile renders irrelevant the justification for warrantless searches relied upon in carroll and its progeny. quite simply, the roving searches are justified by experience with obviously nonmobile sections of a particular road or area embracing several roads. none of the foregoing exceptions to the warrant requirement, then, applies to roving automobile searches in border ..... far as the power to board and search aircraft is concerned, any distance fixed pursuant to paragraph (b) of this section." [ footnote 3/5 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : US Supreme Court
Decided on : Jun-21-1973
..... . . . . . . open bookkeeper-ins . . . . . . . . . . 5,000 clerk-typist . . . . . . . . . . . 4,200 draftsman. . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,000 keypunch d. t. . . . . . . . . . . 6,720 keypunch beginner. . . . . . . . . 4,500 proofreader. . . . . . . . . . . . 4,900 receptionist -- mature d. t. . . . open exec. sec. . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,300 secretary. . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,800 secretary, equal oppor. . . . . . 6,000 secretary d. t. . . . . . . . . . 5,400 teachers-pt. time. . . . . . . . . day 33. typist-statistical . . . . . . . . 5,000 most positions fee paid employment specialists ..... other, job seekers should assume that the advertiser will consider applicants of either sex in compliance with the laws against discrimination." to my way of thinking, pittsburgh press has clearly acted within its protected journalistic discretion in adopting this arrangement of its classified advertisements. especially in light of the newspaper's "notice to job seekers," it is unrealistic for the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : US Supreme Court
Decided on : Feb-22-1973
..... united states v. green, 350 u. s. 415 , 350 u. s. 417 ; united states v. kemble, 198 f.2d 889. [ footnote 6 ] section 2 of the act provided: "any person who, in connection with or in relation to any act in any way or in any degree affecting trade or commerce or any article or commodity moving or about to move in trade ..... physical violence or physical injury to a person or property in furtherance of a plan or purpose to violate sections (a) or (b); or" "(d) conspires or acts concertedly with any other person or persons to commit any of the foregoing acts; shall, upon conviction thereof, be guilty of a felony and shall be punished by imprisonment from one to ten ..... to any person or property in furtherance of a plan or purpose to do anything in violation of this section shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both." "extortion" is defined in the act, as "the obtaining of property from another, with his consent, induced by wrongful use of actual or .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : US Supreme Court
Decided on : Jan-22-1973
..... other medical procedure, the judicial council becomes involved whenever there is alleged violation of the principles of medical ethics as established by the house of delegates." [ footnote 40 ] " uniform abortion act" "section 1. [ abortion defined; when authorized. ]" "(a) 'abortion' means the termination of human pregnancy with an intention other than to produce a live birth or to remove a dead fetus." "(b ..... construed to effectuate its general purpose to make uniform the law with respect to the subject of this act among those states which enact it." "section 4. [ short title. ] this act may be cited as the uniform abortion act." "section 5. [ severability. ] if any provision of this act or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the invalidity does not affect other .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : US Supreme Court
Decided on : Apr-18-1973
..... , 18. but 16(b) remained the same. prior to 1966 and afterward, it read in relevant part: "any employer who violates the provisions of section 6 or section 7 of this act shall be liable to the employee or employees affected in the amount of their unpaid minimum wages, or their unpaid overtime compensation, as the case may be ..... public or private or operated for profit or not for profit." (emphasis added.) [ footnote 2/6 ] section 16(b), 29 u.s.c. 216(b), provides in relevant part: "any employer who violates the provisions of . . . this act shall be liable to the employee or employees affected in the amount of their unpaid minimum wages, or their ..... right of any employee or employees to sue under 16(b) terminates. section 17 gives the secretary power to seek to enjoin violations of the act and to obtain restitution in behalf of employees. sections 16 and 17 suggest that, since private enforcement of the act was not a paramount objective, disallowance of suits by state employees and remitting .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : US Supreme Court
Decided on : Jan-01-1973
..... in controversy, for appropriate relief, including an action for a declaratory judgment, writ of injunction ( subject to the limitations in section 211), and/or damages.' footnote 2 section 1 of the norris-laguardia act provides: 'that no court of the united states, as herein defined, shall have jurisdiction to issue any restraining order or ..... mere ghost to be driven hence by the slogan 'stabilization' and made a mockery by financial aggrandizement. footnotes footnote 1 that section provides: 'any person suffering legal wrong because of any act or practice arising out of this title, or any order or regulation issued pursuant thereto, may bring an action in a ..... growing out of a labor dispute, except in strict conformity with the provisions of this act; nor shall any such restraining order or temporary or permanent injunction be issued contrary to the public policy declared in this act.' section 4 specifies acts which may not be enjoined, including '[c] easing or refusing to perform any .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : US Supreme Court
Decided on : May-21-1973
..... 1967). see fleischmann distilling corp. v. maier brewing co., supra. confronted with a virtually identical situation in mills, we explained that the inclusion in certain sections of the securities exchange act of 1934 of express provisions for recovery of attorneys' fees "should not be read as denying to the courts the power to award counsel fees in suits ..... under other sections of the act when circumstances make such an award appropriate. . . ." 396 u.s. at 396 u. s. 390 -391. that reasoning is equally persuasive today. [ footnote 17 ] ..... of appeals is affirmed. mr. justice marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. page 412 u. s. 16 [ footnote 1 ] section 102 of the act, 29 u.s.c. 412, provides in pertinent part: "any person whose rights secured by the provisions of this subchapter have been infringed by any violation .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : US Supreme Court
Decided on : May-14-1973
..... the scope of commission inquiry under 204. instead, the commission's broad authority to consider anticompetitive and other conduct touching the "public interest" under the other sections of the act emphasizes page 411 u. s. 758 the breadth of its authority under the public interest standard generally and as embodied in 204. this statute was enacted ..... .2d at 953. [ footnote 2/3 ] ii it is common ground that the commission has a responsibility to deal with anticompetitive practices in the power industry. section 10 of the act, 16 u.s.c. 803, provides that the commission may issue licenses to public utilities "on the following conditions," one of which is that: "(h) ..... of the bond issue would be used to finance or refinance certain anticompetitive activities in violation of the antitrust laws, the federal power act, and the public utility holding company act of 1935. section 204(a) empowers the fpc to authorize a security issue only if the issue is found to be for some lawful purpose .....
Tag this Judgment!