Court : US Supreme Court
Decided on : Dec-17-1973
..... (b). there is no explicit provision which makes "interference" by a union with the right of an employee to "refrain" from union activities an unfair labor practice. section 8(c), however, provides: "the expressing of any views, argument, or opinion, or the dissemination thereof, whether, in written, printed, graphic, or visual form ..... with such regulations as may be prescribed by the board --" "(a) by an employee or group of employees or any individual or labor organization acting in their behalf alleging that a substantial number of employees (i) wish to be represented for collective bargaining and that their employer declines to recognize their ..... conducted an election by secret ballot among the production and maintenance employees of respondent at the request of the mechanics educational society of america (hereafter union). under the act, [ footnote 2 ] the union, if it wins the election, becomes "the exclusive representative of all the employees" in that particular unit for purposes of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : US Supreme Court
Decided on : Jun-04-1973
..... distilled spirits. the post exchanges pay no state tax on their resales; and it is stipulated that these post exchanges each make a profit. section 6 of the universal military training and service act, as amended in 1951, authorizes the secretary of defense to make regulations "governing the sale, consumption, possession of or traffic in . . ..... the united states exercises exclusive jurisdiction is sustainable on the basis of the broad regulatory authority conferred upon the states by the twenty-first amendment. the second section of the twenty-first amendment provides: "the transportation or importation into any state, territory, or possession of the united states for delivery or use therein of ..... stranahan, 214 u. s. 320 , 214 u. s. 329 (1909); swift co. v. united states, 111 u. s. 22 , 111 u. s. 28 -29 (1884). [ footnote 12 ] "the constitution does not command that every vestige of the laws of the former sovereignty must vanish. on the contrary, its language has long been interpreted so as .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : US Supreme Court
Decided on : Feb-22-1973
..... united states v. green, 350 u. s. 415 , 350 u. s. 417 ; united states v. kemble, 198 f.2d 889. [ footnote 6 ] section 2 of the act provided: "any person who, in connection with or in relation to any act in any way or in any degree affecting trade or commerce or any article or commodity moving or about to move in trade ..... physical violence or physical injury to a person or property in furtherance of a plan or purpose to violate sections (a) or (b); or" "(d) conspires or acts concertedly with any other person or persons to commit any of the foregoing acts; shall, upon conviction thereof, be guilty of a felony and shall be punished by imprisonment from one to ten ..... to any person or property in furtherance of a plan or purpose to do anything in violation of this section shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both." "extortion" is defined in the act, as "the obtaining of property from another, with his consent, induced by wrongful use of actual or .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : US Supreme Court
Decided on : Dec-04-1973
..... -136. (b) rule 347(b) cannot be categorized as part of a need for uniform national regulation, there being no revelation in the act or in any sec regulation that nationwide uniformity of an exchange's housekeeping affairs is necessary, and it not being shown that national uniformity in the area of wage claims ..... placed in focus with the "historical friendliness of california to the institution of arbitration." feldman, arbitration modernized -- the new california arbitration act, 34 so.calif.l.rev. 413, 414 (1961). section 229 thus survived subsequent legislative scrutiny and has now manifested page 414 u. s. 133 itself as an important state policy through ..... of the securities commission . . . of any state . . . insofar as it does not conflict with the provisions" of the act "or the rules and regulations thereunder." section 28(b), 15 u.s.c. 78bb(b), provides that nothing in the act "shall be construed to modify existing law . . . with regard to the binding effect . . . of [exchange] action .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : US Supreme Court
Decided on : May-07-1973
..... 1969); note, reliance electric and 16(b) litigation: a return to the objective approach?, 58 va.l.rev. 907 (1972); gadsby & treadway, recent developments under section 16(b) of the securities exchange act of 1934, 17 n.y.l.f. 687 (1971). [ footnote 27 ] our differences with the dissent as to the reach and scope of congressional intent and ..... difficult to perceive any speculative value to occidental if the stock declined and tenneco chose not to exercise its option. see generally note, put and call options under section 16 of the securities exchange act, 69 yale l.j. 868 (1960); h. filer, understanding put and call options 96-111 (1959); g. leffler, the stock market 363-378 ( ..... filed a dissenting opinion, in which brennan and stewart, jj., joined, post, p. 411 u. s. 605 . mr. justice white delivered the opinion of the court. section 16(b) of the securities exchange act of 1934, 48 stat. 896, 15 u.s.c. 78p(b), [ footnote 1 ] provides that officers, page 411 u. s. 584 directors, and holders of .....
Tag this Judgment!