Skip to content


Explosively - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: explosively Year: 2003 Page 1 of about 142 results (0.009 seconds)
Jan 21 2003 (HC)

Shekhawat Explosives Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Jan-21-2003

Reported in: RLW2003(1)Raj648; [2004]137STC326(Raj); 2003(2)WLC398; 2003(1)WLN462

..... was that of blasting and in this job is blasting the explosives were used whichstood exhausted in the process of blasting itself therefore ..... there is no effective sale of any explosive by the appellant so as to make it leviable for ..... was that of blasting and in this job is blasting the explosives were used whichstood exhausted in the process of blasting itself therefore .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 21 2003 (TRI)

Premier Explosives Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Nov-21-2003

Reported in: (2004)(92)ECC312

..... order 3 the fact in brief are that m s premier explosives ltd are manufacturers of prepared explosives they clear the explosives manufactured by them by stock transfer to their depots and consignment ..... 1 these are the four appeals filed by m s premier explosives ltd against order nos 74 99 h iii ce 75 99 h iii ce 76 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 01 2003 (TRI)

Commissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Godavari Explosives Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Jan-01-2003

Reported in: (2003)(159)ELT768Tri(Bang.)

..... on merits as well as on the issue of limitation the assessee is manufacturing prepared explosives falling under chapter 36 of the central excise tariff act they are also manufacturing spent ..... they were under the belief that since petn was used in the manufacture of prepared explosives within the factory it need not be accounted for in rg 1 the correct quantity .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 26 2003 (FN)

Wiggins Vs. Smith

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-26-2003

wiggins v smith 539 u s 510 2003 october term 2002 syllabus wiggins v smith warden et al certiorari to...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 10 2003 (HC)

M.P. Special Police Establishment Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Jan-10-2003

Reported in: 2003CriLJ4610; 2003(3)MPHT9; 2003(2)MPLJ204

orders p khare j 1 these are two letters patent appeals by the m p special police establishment challenging the...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 09 2003 (SC)

State, Through Special Cell, New Delhi Vs. Navjot Sandhu @ Afshan Guru ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: May-09-2003

Reported in: 2003(2)ALD(Cri)109; 104(2003)DLT64(SC); (2004)1GLR570; 2003(2)JKJ464[SC]; JT2003(4)SC605; 2003(4)SCALE629; (2003)6SCC641; 2003(2)LC1233(SC)

..... penal code sections 120 120b 121 121a 122 124 186 302 307 332 and 353 explosive substances act sections 3 4 and 5 arms act sections 25 and 27 telegraph act .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 17 2003 (SC)

Rajeevan and anr. Vs. State of Kerala

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Feb-17-2003

Reported in: AIR2003SC1813; 2003CriLJ1572; JT2003(2)SC206; 2003(2)SCALE176; (2003)3SCC355

..... some bjp workers deceased attacked in his shop amp later murdured followed by a bomb explosion eleven persons charge sheeted trial court acquitting all giving reasons of delay in fir delay .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 02 2003 (HC)

Rambriksha Bhuian Vs. the State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand)

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Apr-02-2003

Reported in: 2003(51)BLJR885; [2003(2)JCR450(Jhr)]

..... investigation and submitted charge sheet he arrested the appellant recevered the remains of bomb explosion pistols and cartridges seized broken flanks and other materials informed in writing addressed to ..... time of occurrence no evidence adduced that he is associated with criminals in possessing explosive substances for committing some offence no sanction order to prosecute accorded by competent .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 29 2003 (HC)

State. Vs. Mohd. Afzal and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-29-2003

..... person who unlawfully and maliciously causes by a any explosive substance an explosion of a nature likely to endanger life or to ..... also be liable to fine b any special category explosive substance an explosion of a nature likely to endanger life or to ..... terrorists into parliament house complex procured chemicals for manufacture of explosives used by the slain terrorists who attached parliament house the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 30 2003 (TRI)

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. B.P. Agarwalla and Sons Ltd.

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata

Decided on: Jun-30-2003

Reported in: (2003)86ITD219(Kol.)

..... also been acting as consignment agent for certain chemical companies in respect of explosive goods for transportation of explosives to the collieries the hiring charges had been realized by the assessee ..... the recovery of transportation charges by the assessee from the chemical companies for transportation of explosives section 32 of the it act 1961 provides for allowance of deduction on account of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //