Explosively - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: explosively Year: 2000 Page 1 of about 112 results (0.01 seconds)Adarsh Mahila Siksha Pratisthan and ors. Vs. the Calcutta Municipal Co ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jun-30-2000
Reported in: (2001)2CALLT47(HC)
basudeva panigrahi j 1 this is an application under article 226 of the constitution of india challenging the assessment made...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSecure Meters Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jodhpur
Decided on: Aug-11-2000
1 this appeal by the assessee for asst yr 1992 93 is directed against the order of cit a udaipur...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRoe Vs. Flores-ortega
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-23-2000
roe v flores ortega 528 u s 470 2000 october term 1999 syllabus roe warden v flores ortega certiorari to...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Central Excise Vs. Hindustan Copper Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Dec-06-2000
Reported in: (2001)(74)ECC263
..... mining operation and manufacturing process of zinc and lead concentrates are integrated processes and hence explosives used in mining are to be treated as used in the manufacture of zinc concentrates ..... the manufacture of copper concentrates falling under chapter 26 of the tariff they started obtaining explosives without payment of duty from various manufacturers for use in mines to blast rocks and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTN. Krishnaiah Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-11-2000
Reported in: 2000(5)ALD72; 2000(4)ALT393; 2001CriLJ2972
..... read with section 149 ipc and under section 3 of the explosive substances act and were sentenced to suffer imprisonment for life ..... under sections 148 149 ipc andsections 3 and 5 of the explosive substances act the convict was convicted and sentenced to suffer imprisonment ..... with section 149 ipc and sections 3 and 5 of the explosive substances act he was convicted and sentenced to suffer imprisonment .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJones Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-22-2000
..... word is used congress did not define the crime as the explosion of a building whose damage or destruction might affect interstate ..... i to insert the words fire or before the words an explosive the house report accompanying the 1982 legislation explained that the original ..... measure which was confined to damage caused by an explosive had resulted in problems of practical application h r rep .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Central Excise Vs. Associated Cement Companies Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Aug-04-2000
Reported in: (2000)(122)ELT146TriDel
..... excise appeals in the impugned order the benefit in respect of explosives used in the mines for obtaining lime stone for the manufacture ..... of the respondents submits that in one case mines where the explosives is used is almost 11 kms away from the factory he ..... adjoining the factory of the appellants his contention is that the explosives used in the mines which are adjoining the factory where cement .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAbdul Karim Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Karnataka and Others Etc. Etc.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-07-2000
Reported in: 2001(1)ALD(Cri)12; 2001(1)ALT(Cri)14; 2001CriLJ148; 2000(7)SCALE313; [2000]Supp4SCR382
..... are being continued and the charges under the arms act and explosive substances act to certain extent cover the provisions of section ..... the designated court in cases arising under the tada act the explosive substances act the indian penal code and the arms act ..... other penal provisions i e indian penal code arms act and explosive substances act d from their source information police authorities had .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJeet Singh and anr. Vs. State of Punjab
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-15-2000
Reported in: JT2001(2)SC70; (2000)9SCC588
..... witnesses accordingly he reached the conclusion that both the appellants were in possession of those explosive substances mentioned above and hence they are guilty of the offence under section 5 of ..... too many methods if they wanted to concoct a case without procuring such costly and explosive substances 11 bestowing our anxious consideration on the arguments forcefully addressed by the learned senior .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDes Raj Taneja Vs. State of Punjab
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-28-2000
Reported in: 2000CriLJ3393
..... of fire works in large quantity without licence under section 4 1 of the act explosives include the fire works also section 5 authorises the central government to make rules regulating ..... and prohibiting the manufacture and possession of explosives except under and in accordance with the conditions of the licence granted section 6 also .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial