Skip to content


Explosively - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: explosively Year: 1983 Page 1 of about 38 results (0.006 seconds)
Apr 14 1983 (TRI)

Indian Explosives Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Apr-14-1983

Reported in: (1983)LC949DTri(Delhi)

..... excise and customs for the purposes of distinguishing cellulose nitrate used in the manufacture of explosives alone from cellulose nitrate used for other industrial purposes for which artificial or synthetic ..... and other characteristics which make them preeminently suitable for use in the manufacture of explosives they should not be classified under item 82 3 and would accordingly be classifiable .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 10 1983 (HC)

The State of Tamil Nadu Vs. Southern Explosives Co.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Nov-10-1983

Reported in: [1984]57STC173(Mad)

..... said sum represents the sales turnover of three items namely explosives detonators and safety fuses the assessee contended that the sales ..... order so as to cover all the three items namely explosives detonators and safety fuses thus the order of the tribunal ..... will clearly indicate that those entries cannot take in either explosives or detonators or safety fuses therefore the contention of the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 23 1983 (HC)

Sreeshyla Industries Employees' Union Vs. State Bank of India and Anr. ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jun-23-1983

Reported in: [1985]57CompCas639(Kar); 1984(2)KarLJ105

venkatachaliah j 1 this appeal is directed against the order dated april 22 1983 made by the learned company judge...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 22 1983 (HC)

Sreeshyla Industries Employees' Union Vs. State Bank of India and Ors. ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jun-22-1983

Reported in: (1984)IILLJ451Kant

venkatachalaiah j 1 this appeal is directed against the order dated 22nd april 1983 made by the learned company judge...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 04 1983 (HC)

Mohammed YamIn Vs. State

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-04-1983

Reported in: 23(1983)DLT464

..... colleague all this is not sufficient to convict the appellant for possession or use of explosive substances nor does it prove the charge of conspiracy to manufacture bombs along with ..... bursting of grenade the central forensic science laboratory report that the examination of site of explosion and examination of contents indicated that the deceased was in the process of manufacturing country .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 16 1983 (SC)

Bandhua Mukti Morcha Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Dec-16-1983

Reported in: AIR1984SC802; 1984LabIC560; 1983(2)SCALE1151; (1984)3SCC161; [1984]2SCR67; 1984(16)LC29(SC)

..... stone quarries extend below superjacent ground and they are not open cast workings and moreover explosives are admittedly used in connection with the excavation the conditions set out in the proviso ..... lessees and stone crusher owners and the workmen are required to carry on blasting with explosives without any first aid qualification or first aid outfit we would therefore direct the central .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 03 1983 (HC)

indrajit Barua Vs. the State of Assam and anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jun-03-1983

Reported in: AIR1983Delhi513

..... capable of being used as weapons or fire arms ammunition and explosive substances section5 powers to destroy arms dump fortified positions etc ..... suspected to be stolen property or any arms ammunition or explosive substances believed to be unlawfully kept in such premises and ..... capable of being used as weapons of fire arms ammunition explosive substances as far as the situation at a is concerned .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 05 1983 (HC)

Avdhesh Kumar Vs. the State

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-05-1983

Reported in: 23(1983)DLT482

..... prima facie guilty of an offence under section 6 of the indian explosives act 1908 this order is challenged in the present petition the ..... the co accused against avdesh kumar was inadmissible in evidence as no explosive or any other thing was recovered from avdesh kumar the learned ..... him the offences under sections 3 4 and 5 of the explosives act do not fall within the jurisdiction of delhi courts 5 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 19 1983 (HC)

Gautam Saikia and Etc. Vs. District Magistrate and ors.

Court: Guwahati

Decided on: Aug-19-1983

..... 122 i p c and case no 48 83 under section 5 of explosive substances act read with section 122 i p c as well as ..... recital of the ground which reads as the procurement of arms ammunitions and explosives as indicated is a part of a plan to kill any bidhayaks ..... part of the recital we have extracted the procurement of arms ammunitions and explosives as indicated is a part of a plan to kill any bidhayaks .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 21 1983 (HC)

Management of theatre Sanjaya Vs. the State and ors.

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Apr-21-1983

Reported in: ILR1984KAR539; (1984)IILLJ400Kant

..... workmen relied on the judgment of the allahabad high court in indian explosive ltd v state of u p 1981 ii l l j 159 ..... local authority a division bench of the allahabad high court in indian explosive ltd fertiliser division panki kanpur v state of uttar pradesh and others ..... 1977 ii l l j 363 the allahabad high court in indian explosive ltd s case supra the travancore cochin high court in nagalinga nadar .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //