Expenditure - Judgment Search Results
H.H. Prince Azam Jha Bahadur (Dead) Through Lrs Vs. Expenditure Tax Of ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-30-1971
Reported in: AIR1972SC2319; [1972]83ITR92(SC); (1971)3SCC621; [1972]1SCR470
by certificate are common and relate primarily to the true scope and interpretation of certain provisions of the Expenditure Tax Act, 1957, as amended by the Finance Act, 1959, hereinafter called the 'Act'.2. The facts in C.As.
Commissioner of Expenditure-tax, Andhra Pradesh Vs. P.V.G. Raju
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-29-1975
Reported in: AIR1976SC140; [1975]101ITR465(SC); (1976)1SCC241; [1976]1SCR1017; 1975(7)LC838(SC)
J.1. Politics and philanthropy may well fall victim to the construction of Section 5(a) and (j) of the Expenditure Tax Act, 1958 (the Act, for short) if we fall victim to the submission naively made, at the
Commissioner of Expenditure-tax, Gujarat, Ahmedabad Vs. Darshan Surend ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-12-1967
Reported in: AIR1968SC1125; (1968)0GLR1043; [1968]69ITR683(SC); [1968]2SCR589
of the two sets of properties and of income received therefrom. Surendra was also possessed of separate property. Expenditure for the education of the three children was, it appears, defrayed out of the income received from the
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Commissioner of Expenditure Tax Vs. Baldeo Dass Rameshwar
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Dec-05-1983
Reported in: [1984]147ITR473(Raj)
Dwarka Prasad, J. 1. The assessee, M/s. Baldeo Dass Rameshwar, was assessed to expenditure tax in the status of an HUF, in respect of assessment years 1958-59 and 1959-60, referable to the
Commissioner of Expenditure-tax Vs. Rao Raja Vikram Singh
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jan-07-1980
Reported in: [1980]123ITR190(Raj); 1980()WLN76
1. This is a reference by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench 'C', under Section 25 of the Expenditure-tax Act, 1957 (which will hereinafter be referred to as 'the Act'). The question of law referred to us
Commissioner of Expenditure Tax Vs. Gopi Chand B. TholiA.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-27-1980
Reported in: (1980)18CTR(Raj)330; 1980()WLN630
M. L. Shrimal, J. - In relation to asst. yr. 1960-61 notice u/s 13(2) of the Expenditure Tax Act, 1957 (to be hereinafter referred to as the Act), was served on M/s. Gopi Chand B.
Commissioner of Expenditure-tax, Bombay City I Vs. Lalchand Hirachand
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-15-1965
Reported in: (1965)67BOMLR664; [1965]58ITR60(Bom); 1965MhLJ820
partition. Out of the said incomes which the sons had received from the said assets, they had incurred expenditure on themselves in the amounts of Rs. 11,169, Rs. 7,582 and Rs. 17,427, respectively. In the assessment for
Commissioner of Expenditure Tax, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad Vs. S.R.Y. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-19-1968
Reported in: AIR1970AP197; [1970]78ITR622(AP)
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal has referred the following question of law for our opinion under Sec. 64(1) of the Expenditure Tax Act, 1957 (hereinafter called 'the Act). viz.'whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case
Commissioner of Expenditure-tax Vs. Laxmipat Singhania
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Feb-09-1972
Reported in: [1973]91ITR459(All)
R.L. Gulati, J.1. This is a reference under Section 25(1) of the Expenditure-tax Act, 1957, at the instance of the Commissioner of Expenditure-tax, U.P., Lucknow.2. The reference arises out of assessments
The Additional Expenditure Tax Officer, Palghat Vs. V. Venugopala Ravi ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Nov-05-1965
Reported in: AIR1966Ker235
Velu Pillai, J. 1. These appeals by the Additional Expenditure Tax Officer, Palghat, are directed against the orders of a learned Judge of this Court, allowing two writ
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free