Expedition - Judgment Search Results

Wild Expeditions Tour and Travels Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2007)7STT56

1 this stay application is directed against computation of service tax amount and penalty imposed on the applicants 2 it...

Wild Expedition Tours and Travels Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2007)8STT229

1 the applicant has also filed an appeal challenging the order of commissioner appeals made on 3 8 2006 and...

Arun Raj Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

h l dattu j 1 this appeal by special leave is limited to a particular question only namely correctness of...

Parkash Vs. State of Haryana

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2004SC227; 2004(1)ALD(Cri)40; 2004CriLJ595; JT2003(10)SC58; 2003(10)SCALE389; (2004)1SCC339

acts rules orders indian penal code 1860 sections 361 363 366 376 and 511cases referred state of haryana v raja...

The State of Gujarat Vs. Keshavlal Maganbhai Jogani and ors.

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: 1993CriLJ248; (1992)2GLR882

m s parikh j 1 this appeal by the appellant state of gujarat arises out of the judgment and order...

Wiborg Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... fast line separating commercial transactions in munitions of war and the organizing of hostile expeditions international law is necessarily incapable of being defined and laid down with the ..... district judge specifically and clearly instructed the jury that although this was a military expedition or enterprise nevertheless the defendants were not criminally responsible unless they were aware .....

Tidewater Oil Co. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... these previous remarks on the contrary we remain convinced that under present circumstances the expediting act fails to hasten substantially the final disposition of important antitrust actions while ..... appeals involving important and controlling questions of law are a useful means of expediting litigation although 1292 b authorizes a departure from the general rule against interlocutory .....

Wilkes Vs. Dinsman

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the defendant still commanding page 48 u s 93 said expedition and said ship and his subordinate officers whereupon the defendant ..... the said naval officers and other civilians attached to said expedition and on board the said ship that on the several ..... prolonged the cruise of said vessels belonging to said exploring expedition defendant s 3d bill of exceptions whereupon the defendant prayed .....

Bread Political Action Comm'n Vs. FEC

Court: US Supreme Court

..... three categories of plaintiffs who may challenge the constitutional validity of feca in specially expedited suits 1 the federal election commission fec 2 the national committee of any political ..... may be raised as a defense in an enforcement action and will be afforded expedited review footnote 4 furthermore plaintiffs meeting the usual standing requirements can challenge provisions of .....

Ohio Vs. Akron Center

Court: US Supreme Court

..... not deprive her of this right without due process since its confidentiality provisions expedited procedures pleading form requirements clear and convincing evidence standard and constructive authorization ..... the so called and fragile guarantee of anonymity the insufficiency of the expedited procedures the constructive authorization provision and the clear and convincing evidence requirement .....