Exp - Judgment Search Results

R. De Quijas Vs. Shearson/Am. Exp.

Court: US Supreme Court

R. de Quijas v. Shearson/Am. Exp. - 490 U.S. 477 (1989) U.S. Supreme Court R. de Quijas v. Shearson/Am. Exp., 490 U.S. 477 (1989)

Federal Trade Commission vs. Fruit Growers' Exp

Court: US Supreme Court

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. FRUIT GROWERS' EXP - 261 U.S. 629 (1923) U.S. Supreme Court FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. FRUIT GROWERS' EXP, 261 U.S. 629

United States Vs. American Ry. Exp. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

United States v. American Ry. Exp. Co. - 265 U.S. 425 (1924) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. American Ry. Exp. Co., 265 U.S.

Hetero International Vs. Shandong Medicines and Health Products Imp an ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2006(1)ALLMR198; II(2006)BC500; 2006(1)BomCR143; (2005)107BOMLR718

case of the plaintiffs that the plaintiffs are a firm inter alia carrying on business of import and export of bulk drugs and life saving pharmaceuticals. It is further case of the plaintiffs that plaintiffs desired to

Narendra Mafatlal Mehta Vs. Chief Controller of Imps. and Exps

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1989(25)LC91(Bombay); 1989(44)ELT36(Bom)

absolute by Pendse J. on 26th November 1982. He directed the respondents 'to issue to the petitioner the Export House Certificate under the Import Policy April 1978-March 1979 within a period of one month from today. The

Shree Krishna Woollen Mills P. Ltd. Vs. Controller of Imp. and Exp.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1989(43)ELT50(Bom)

Waste. Between the 25th of May 1981 and 22nd of September 1983 the Petitioners not only fulfilled the export obligation under the Advance Licence but exported excess goods which entitled them to an export entitlement certificate for

Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai Vs. Silkon Silk Mills (Exp) Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2002)(81)ECC498

(4) If the provisions as mentioned in para 1, 2 & 3 above are considered restrictions, whether any export contrary to these restrictions will be considered as export contrary to prohibition imposed by or under the Customs

Marque Impex Vs. Commissioner of Customs (Exp.)

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2005)(189)ELT459Tri(Mum.)bai

1. The dispute in the present appeal relates to the rate of drawback in respect of exports made by the appellants.2. As per the facts on records, the appellants filed six shipping bills all dated

Al HussaIn Frozen Foods and Another Vs. Commissioner of Customs (Exp), ...

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

the appeal itself and stay application. 3. The brief facts of the case are that the respondents are exporter of buffalo meat. The goods were examined and found not fit for human consumption. Therefore goods were confiscated

Manoharan Kappatan and Others Vs. Union of India Represented by the Se ...

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Field Offices (non-secretariat and subordinate offices. They produced Annx.A10 which was obtained under RTI Act from Department of Expenditure to show that "As per 6th CPCs Report as accepted by the Government, the pre-revised scale of Rs.