Exclusive - Judgment Search Results
“6-c. Exclusion of Counter-claim.- Where a Defendant Vs. Punjab Nati ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Sep-05-2013
in the suit. Rule 6-C reads as under :- “6-C. Exclusion of counter-claim.- Where a defendant sets up a counter-claim and
Express Exclusive Developers Pvt Ltd. Vs. The Inspector General of Reg ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-22-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Mandamus directing the second...
Exclusive Motors Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Automobili Lamborghini Spa and Another
Court: Competition Appellate Tribunal
Decided on: Feb-28-2014
V.S. Sirpurkar, Chairman. 1. The appellant - M/s. Exclusive Motors Pvt. Ltd. has challenged an order passed by Competition
Voras Exclusive Tools (P.) Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-11-1983
Reported in: (1984)7ITD620(Mum.)
1. These seven appeals, relating to the assessment years 1971-72 to 1977-78, filed by the assessee-company against the orders of...
The Chinese Exclusion Case
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-13-1889
jurisdiction of the nation within its own territory is necessarily exclusive and absolute. It is susceptible of no limitation not imposed
Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Vora Exclusive Tools Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-17-1988
Reported in: [1990]186ITR533(Bom)
T.D. Sugla, J.1. The question of law raised in this reference at the instance of the Department reads thus :'Whether,...
Ms. Pushpa Prabhudas Vora and ors. Vs. Voras Exclusive Tools Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Company Law Board CLB
Decided on: Dec-23-1999
Reported in: (2000)101CompCas300
1. Voras Exclusive Tools Private Limited, in the affairs of which acts of
Whether the Plaintiff Is Exclusive Owner in Possession of the Vs. Gene ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-11-2014
the Courts below, whereby suit for declaration that she is exclusive owner in possession of the property in question was dismissed.
“(1) Whether the Plaintiffs Are in Exclusive Possession as Vs. Shiv ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-14-2014
According to them, the land in dispute was not the exclusive property of the respondents and was, in fact, jointly owned
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›