Skip to content


Exclusion - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: exclusion Page 1 of about 9 results (0.021 seconds)
May 13 1889 (FN)

The Chinese Exclusion Case

Court: US Supreme Court

country whenever in its judgment the public interests require such exclusion has been asserted in repeated instances, Page 130 U. S.

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 28 2014 (TRI)

Exclusive Motors Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Automobili Lamborghini Spa and Another

Court: Competition Appellate Tribunal

had a unhindered right to import the cars to the exclusion of others. There was nothing wrong, if the Respondent No.1

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 05 2013 (HC)

“6-c. Exclusion of Counter-claim.- Where a Defendant Vs. Punjab Nati ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

in the suit. Rule 6-C reads as under :- 6-C. Exclusion of counter-claim.- Where a defendant sets up a counter-claim and

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 11 1983 (TRI)

Voras Exclusive Tools (P.) Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in: (1984)7ITD620(Mum.)

1. These seven appeals, relating to the assessment years 1971-72 to 1977-78, filed by the assessee-company against the orders of...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 22 2016 (HC)

Express Exclusive Developers Pvt Ltd. Vs. The Inspector General of Reg ...

Court: Chennai

(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Mandamus directing the second...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 23 1999 (TRI)

Ms. Pushpa Prabhudas Vora and ors. Vs. Voras Exclusive Tools Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Company Law Board CLB

Reported in: (2000)101CompCas300

guise of a quasi-partnership, to one group of shareholders in exclusion of the other group is an act of oppression meriting

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 17 1988 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Vora Exclusive Tools Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: [1990]186ITR533(Bom)

T.D. Sugla, J.1. The question of law raised in this reference at the instance of the Department reads thus :'Whether,...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 14 2014 (HC)

“(1) Whether the Plaintiffs Are in Exclusive Possession as Vs. Shiv ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

below have recorded their concurrent findings. Further, appellants never claimed exclusive ownership of the suit property marked by letters ABCD. Defendants-appellants

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 11 2014 (HC)

Whether the Plaintiff Is Exclusive Owner in Possession of the Vs. Gene ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Court framed the following issues: 1. Whether the plaintiff is exclusive owner in possession of the suit property as detailed in

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.
  • Next >>

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //