Excise - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: excise Year: 2004 Page 1 of about 1,419 results (0.076 seconds)Colfax Laboratories (India) Ltd., a Company Incorporated Under the Com ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-03-2004
Reported in: 2005(1)ALLMR785
..... classification and or calculation it was further held that the classification as made by the excise commissioner as toilet preparations instead of medicinal preparations did not call for any interference ..... they are manufactured or any premises appurtenant thereto which may be specified by the excise commissioner in this behalf whether for consumption export or manufacture of any other commodity .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGarware Polyester Limited and Mr. S.S. Vaswani Vs. Union of India (Uoi ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-16-2004
Reported in: 2004(3)BomCR545; 2005(101)ECC420
..... amount upto 31 5 1991 the said application was filed before the assistant collector central excise aurangabad division during the pendency of the said application the company approached the high court ..... submission on behalf of the government that the question regarding the application of the central excise and customs laws amendment act 1991 was under consideration of the government and therefore it .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTN. Duraikannu Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Union Territory of Pondicherry ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-30-2004
Reported in: (2004)4MLJ489
..... gave a reply and after considering the reply the deputy commissioner excise the third respondent herein found that arulraj was the agent of ..... for cancellation of licence under section 28 1 b of the excise act as the proceedings for the commission of offence under the ..... for cancellation of licence under section 28 1 b of the excise act 4 the third submission of learned counsel for the appellant .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Central Excise, Pondicherry Vs. Acer India Ltd.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-24-2004
Reported in: 2004(96)ECC313; 2004(172)ELT289(SC); JT2004(8)SC53; 2004(8)SCALE169; (2004)8SCC173; [2004]137STC596(SC)
..... dismissed accordingly however interlocutory applications are allowed no costs excise central excise act 1944 sections 2 3 4 4 1 4 ..... customers load operational software while calculating the amount of central excise payable thereupon it would deduct the value of the operational ..... thereof also is taken into consideration for the purpose of excise duty but the operational software which are implanted on .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Central Excise, Lucknow, U.P. Vs. Chhata Sugar Co. Ltd ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-27-2004
Reported in: 2004(92)ECC457; 2004(165)ELT369(SC); JT2004(3)SC167; (2004)3SCC466
..... the order of the assistant commissioner however was set aside by the commissioner appeals central excise allahabad vide order dated 14th may 1998 being aggrieved the department preferred on appeal ..... neyvelilignite corporation ltd v commercial tax officer cuddalore and anr air2001sc3945 and commissioner of central excise delhi v maruti udyog ltd 2002 141 elt3 sc the administrative charges payable by .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCollector of Central Excise, Patna Vs. Tata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-26-2004
Reported in: 2004(2)BLJR1397; 2004(2)CTC55; 2004(92)ECC257; 2004(165)ELT386(SC); JT2004(3)SC66; 2004(1)KLT1050(SC); (2004)3MLJ52(SC); 2004(2)SCALE760; (2004)9SCC1
..... galvanization of steel sheets revenue holding that zinc dross and flux skimming liable to central excise duty challenged as not payable by assessee on ground that dross and skimming were ..... neither goods nor end products nor finished products attracting duty under item 25 of central excise tariff validity since respondents being engaged in manufacture of steel sheets and galvanizing steel sheets .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTT.T.G. Industries Ltd., Madras Vs. Collector of Central Excise, Raipur
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-07-2004
Reported in: 2004(94)ECC65; 2004(167)ELT501(SC); 2004(5)SCALE585; (2004)4SCC751
..... evidence on record including the correspondence exchanged between the appellant and the collectorate of excise authorities having jurisdiction over their factory at chennai we have noticed earlier that ..... complete machinery was manufactured and erected only at bhilai the concerned officers of central excise namely the indore collectorate which had jurisdiction over bhilai were never informed about .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTi.T.C. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, New Delhi and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-10-2004
Reported in: 2004(96)ECC97; 2004(171)ELT433(SC); JT2004(7)SC409; 2004(7)SCALE540; (2004)7SCC591
..... price notification does not envisage inquiry into correctness of mrp printed on packages by excise officer excise officer limited to satisfying himself that there is declaration in prescribed form impugned ..... cigarette packet 3 sometime prior to march 1987 searches were carried out by central excise officers at various premises including the five factories the registered office the district offices .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur Vs. J.K. Udaipur Udyog Ltd.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-03-2004
Reported in: 2004(96)ECC73; 2004(171)ELT289(SC); JT2004(7)SC152; 2004(3)SCALE6; (2004)7SCC344
..... is an extension of the factory area the assistant commissioner central excise by his order dated 29 8 2001 disallowed the cenvat ..... this court rendered in jaypee rewa cement v commissioner of central excise raipur 2001ecr193 sc for holding that even if inputs are ..... 1 the provisions of this section shall apply to such finished excisable goods hereinafter referred to as the final products as the central .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKores India Ltd., Chennai Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-23-2004
Reported in: 2004(97)ECC393; 2004(174)ELT7(SC); 2004(9)SCALE633; (2005)1SCC385
..... commercially inexpedient that process is one in relation to the manufacture see collector of central excise jaipur v rajanthan state chemical works deedwana rajasthan 1891 4 scc 473 12 manufacture is ..... evade therefore the contention that the assessee harboured bonafide and germane belief of the non excise ability of the product was not acceptable no clarification from the department was sought for .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial