Excise - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: excise Year: 1950 Page 1 of about 413 results (0.092 seconds)Excise Department Vs. Chota Hanmanthu
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-11-1950
Reported in: 1951CriLJ718
1 this is an appeal submitted by ft state against the order of acquittal passed by the mag of alampur...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTExcise Department Vs. Magiah
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-11-1950
Reported in: 1951CriLJ281
1 this is an appeal submitted by state against the order of acquittal passed by the magistrate of alampur dated...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTExcise Department Vs. Chota Hanmanthu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-11-1950
Reported in: 1951CriLJ514
1 this is an appeal submitted by a state against the order of acquittal passed by the mag of alampur...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState Through Customs and Excise Department Vs. Darshanlal Surajmal an ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-22-1950
Reported in: 1951CriLJ625
..... was not entertainable as there is no procedure under section 58 excise act for the forfeiture of the security alone the same order ..... was confirmed by the ses j hence the superintendent customs excise department has filed this revision 2 the first question for consideration ..... who appeared on behalf of the petnr admits that section 58 excise act is not applicable in the case of offences committed .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTD. Mohideen Sahib and Co., Excise Contractors Vs. Commissioner of Inco ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-16-1950
Reported in: AIR1950Mad451; [1950]18ITR200(Mad)
viswanatha sastri j 1 the question that has been referred to us for our opinion is as follows whether the...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMoti Lal and ors. Vs. the Government of the State of Uttar Pradesh and ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-11-1950
Reported in: AIR1951All257
malik c j 1 these applications have been filed on behalf of certain persons who own motor buses and carry...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNaraIn Swadeshi Weaving Mills, Chheharta (Amritsar) Vs. Commr. of Exce ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Sep-08-1950
Reported in: AIR1953P& H72
weston c j 1 this is a reference or rather four references consolidated into one made under section 66 1...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTA.K. Gopalan Vs. the State of Madras
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-19-1950
Reported in: AIR1950SC27; 1950CriLJ1383; (1950)IIMLJ42(SC); [1950]1SCR88
1 this is a petition by the applicant under article 32 1 of the constitution of india for a writ...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM.K. Ispahani Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Excess Profits Tax
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-10-1950
Reported in: AIR1953Cal314,[1952]21ITR490(Cal)
sinha j 1 this is a reference under section 21 excess profits tax act read with section 66 1 income...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTurner Morrison and Co. Ltd. Vs. Comr. of I.T.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-25-1950
Reported in: AIR1952Cal403,[1951]19ITR451(Cal)
sen j 1 there are six references by the income tax appellate tribunal calcutta bench made under section 66 1...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial