Skip to content


Excise - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: excise Year: 1966 Page 1 of about 359 results (0.037 seconds)
Jan 14 1966 (HC)

Associated Hotels of India Ltd. Vs. Excise and Taxation Officer and an ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jan-14-1966

Reported in: AIR1966P& H449; [1966]17STC555(P& H)

..... 1965 if possible by his order dated october 27 1965 shri daryao singh additional assistant excise and taxation commissioner punjab patiala has now dismissed the revision petition of the petitioners a ..... of the counsel for the petitioners and of the departmental representatives the learned additional assistant excise and taxation commissioner referred to para 4 b of the chart of oberoi mount view .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 28 1966 (HC)

Assistant Collector of Central Excise Vs. National Tobacco Co. of Indi ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Sep-28-1966

Reported in: AIR1967Cal269,71CWN1

..... in such manner as may be prescribed duties of excise on all excisable goods other than salt which are produced and ..... agarpara are manufacturers of cigarettes upon a large scale the excise authorities found it convenient to follow the following practice ..... the column distributors selling price disappeared from the list the excise authorities considered this as being deliberately planned in order .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 22 1966 (HC)

Dayal Krishnan Vs. Assessing Authority-cum-excise and Taxation Officer ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Mar-22-1966

Reported in: AIR1966P& H490; [1966]18STC117(P& H)

..... assessment or any other order passed by an assessing authority shall lie to the deputy excise and taxation commissioner concerned hereafter referred to as appellate authority rule 59 1 the memorandum ..... referred to in the above said notification of 28th february 1944 were called the central excise rules 1944 these included rule 215 as subsequently amended which provided as under 215 application .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 18 1966 (HC)

Koteswara Rao (K.) and ors. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh by Secretary, ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Jul-18-1966

Reported in: (1968)IILLJ729AP

..... by absorption of officers and personnel then working in the excise and prohibition department in the andhra area 3 by selecting ..... the government was not competent to direct reorganisation of the excise and prohibition department the contention was that when the petitioner ..... valid objections to categorize them the police department or the excise department or directly recruited in my opinion is to make .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 13 1966 (HC)

K. Koteswararao Etc. and ors. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh by Secretary ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Jul-13-1966

Reported in: AIR1968AP129

..... for the petitioner that the government was not competent to direct reorganisation of the excise and prohibition department the contention was that when the petitioners were appointed permanently to ..... 311 2 of constitution of india petitioners challenging their transfer from police department to excise and prohibition department on account of reorganisation alleged that board of revenue not authorized .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 07 1966 (HC)

The United Tobacco Co. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise, Hyderabad

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Nov-07-1966

Reported in: AIR1968AP282

..... for reconsideration of the decision in sita ramaiah v collector of central excise hyderabad ilr 1963 andh pra 42 delivered by a bench of ..... such owner this section subsequently was made applicable to the central excises and salt act by notification no 69 59 dated 18 7 ..... 59 made under section 12 of the central excises and salt act which authorises the central government by a notification .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 19 1966 (HC)

Chandrasekara Bharathi Weaving Mills and ors. Vs. Assistant Collector ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jul-19-1966

Reported in: 1981(8)ELT62(Mad)

..... illegal and unsustainable he submitted that rule 230 of the central excise rules is not applicable to either of the two detention orders ..... the government conferred on it under section 37 of the central excise act he further contended that rule 230 was amended on 20 ..... and balaji company are themselves illegal and contrary to the central excise rules and relied on a recent decision of the supreme court .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 23 1966 (HC)

Sovachand Mulchand Vs. the Collector of Central Excise and Land Custom ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Nov-23-1966

Reported in: AIR1968Cal174,71CWN700

..... pakistan 2 on the 31st august 1951 the collector of central excise and land customs gave a notice to the petitioner alleging ..... of aluminium ware to eastern pakistan 4 the collector of central excise land customs calcutta passed an order on the 12th december ..... the decision of this court in dullchand v collector of central excise air1965cal156 in this case the order of confiscation of seized betelnuts .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 11 1966 (HC)

Kamal Kishore Vs. Assistant Commissioner, Excise and Taxation

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Aug-11-1966

Reported in: (1967)IILLJ231Raj

..... constitution is directed against en order of the assistant commissioner excise and taxation sikar by which the services of the petitioner ..... the petitioner went up in appeal to the deputy commissioner excise and taxation but met with no success he therefore preferred ..... first place it is contended that the respondent assistant commissioner excise and taxation sikar was not competent to terminate his .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 30 1966 (HC)

Ganeshmul Channilal Gandhi and anr. Vs. Collector of Central Excise an ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Mar-30-1966

Reported in: AIR1968Kant89; AIR1968Mys89

..... act 52 of 1962 2 on february 21 1963 a central excise officer seized from the two petitions 49 pieces of gold at ..... was that a certain mr gujar who was the deputy superintendent of excise has visited each of the petitioners on september 14 1963 at ..... of the respondents of which the dependent is the superintendent of central excise in bangalore the allegation that mr gujar made an unsuccessful bid .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //