Excisable - Judgment Search Results

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Customs Excise Gold (Control) Appel ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: 2002(79)ECC756

approached the Tribunal. The appeal having been dismissed, it filed a petition under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 for a reference to this Court. The petition was dismissed. Hence this petition.2. The Revenue maintains

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 120(2005)DLT549; 2008(228)GLT338

Swatanter Kumar, J.1. The Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai issued a show cause notice to M/s Sharda Motors Industries Ltd. on 24.5.2001 requiring the said company

The Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Customs, Excise and Gold (Contr ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2008(125)ECC203; 2008(151)LC203(Madras)

ORDERK. Raviraja Pandian, J.1. These reference case petitions are filed under Section 35H(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The assessee, the Madras Aluminium Company Ltd., is manufacturer of Aluminium and articles thereof falling under

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2008(125)ECC123; 2008(151)LC123(Madras); 2008(227)ELT361(Mad)

ORDERChitra Venkataraman, J.1. This is a petition filed by the Revenue under Section 35H of the Central Excise Act, 1944, to direct the first respondent Tribunal to state the case on the following question of law

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2006(202)ELT758(Mad)

Markandey Katju, C.J.1. This is a reference application under Section 35H(1) of the Central Excise Act, by which the following question is sought to be referred to us for our opinion:-'Whether the Tribunal

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2005(2)CTC466

ORDERMarkandey Katju, C.J.1. This reference application seeks direction to the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (in short CEGAT) to refer to this Court the following question of law:Whether

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2006(203)ELT20(Mad)

the learned counsel for the parties. The question sought to be raised under section 35H of the Central Excise Act is as follows:-'Whether the Hon'ble CEGAT is correct in holding that resultant product is not cotton carded

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Customs, Excise, Gold Control Appel ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2006(202)ELT753(Mad)

reads as follows : 'Rule 57A. Applicability. (1) The provisions of this section shall apply to such finished excisable goods (hereafter, in this section, referred to as the final products) as the Central Government may, by notification

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Customs Excise and Service Tax Appe ...

Court: Chennai

under Rule 57-CC(1) had to be done in the same manner as was the case with any other excisable goods as the rate of duty stood determined at the rate of eight per cent in the Rule

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Customs Excise and Service Tax Appe ...

Court: Chennai

Appeals. The second respondent/assessees herein are manufacturers of plastic bags/plastic cups (hereinafter referred to as the Final Products), excisable as goods classified under Chapter sub heading 39.23/39.24 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. For the manufacture of