Excess - Judgment Search Results
V. Jaganmohan Rao and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax and Excess P ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jul-31-1969
Reported in: [1970]75ITR373(SC)
1944-45, 1945-46, 1946-47 not only to income-tax but also to excess profits tax. On February 1, 1941, he purchased from Randhi
Commissioner of Excess Profit Tax, Kanpur Vs. Kalyan Mal Phool Chand
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-13-1987
Reported in: AIR1987SC2140; [1987]166ITR180(SC); 1987(1)SCALE563; (1987)2SCC458; [1987]2SCR601; 1987(1)LC721(SC)
21st February 1971. It relates to the assessment under the Excess Profits Tax Act, 1940 (hereinafter called the 'Act'). The assessee
Commissioner of Excess Profit Tax, Bombay City Vs. Sri Lakshmi Silk Mi ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-18-1951
Reported in: AIR1951SC454; (1952)54BOMLR1; [1951]20ITR451(SC); [1952]1SCR1
appeal centers round the point as to whether or not excess profits tax is payable on the sum of Rs. 20,005
Commr. of Excess Profits Tax, West Bengal Vs. Adair Dutt and Company L ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-29-1954
Reported in: AIR1955SC254; [1954]26ITR750(SC)
years 1936-37 and 1938-39 under Section 6(2) (b) of the Excess Profits Tax Act. Its profits for these years as determined
Commissioner of Excess Profits Tax, Madras Vs. N.M. Rayaloo Iyer and S ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-08-1960
Reported in: AIR1961SC692; [1961]41ITR671(SC); [1961]3SCR60
494 of 1958 arises out of orders passed in certain excess profits tax appeals and Appeal No. 495 of 1958 arises
Commissioner of Excess Profits Tax, Bombay City-i, Bombay Vs. Tata Iro ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-10-1976
Reported in: [1978]115ITR538(Bom)
Tulzapurkar, J.1. In this excess profits tax reference made by the Tribunal to this court
Commissioner of Excess Profits Tax, Bombay City I Vs. Ramgopal Ganpatr ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-28-1971
Reported in: [1972]85ITR272(Bom)
Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, read with section 21 of the Excess Profits Tax Act, 1940. The assessee is a private limited
Commissioner of Excess Profits Tax, Bombay City Vs. Bhogilal H. Patel, ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-30-1951
Reported in: [1952]21ITR72(Bom)
entitled to the same relief for the purposes of the excess profits tax for the chargeable accounting period 1943. The Tribunal
Commissioner of Excess Profits Tax, Bombay City Vs. Moholal Maganlal
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-09-1952
Reported in: [1953]23ITR45(Bom)
Ltd. to be the selling agents of the mills. The Excess Profits Tax Officer while making the excess profits assessment for
Commissioner of Excess Profits Tax, Bombay Vs. the India United Mills ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-01-1952
Reported in: [1952]21ITR71(Bom)
law and equity. 2. The assessee company was assessed to excess profits tax for the year 1941, 1942 and 1943 and
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »