Exceeding - Year 2016 - Judgments

Jul 01 2016 (HC)

State of Karnataka Vs. Sri Jagadev Biradar

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jul-01-2016

..... that a in case of three wheelers including autorickshaws used for transportation of goods not exceeding 1500 kgs in weight laden and vehicles permitted to carry three passengers excluding driver either ..... of such reciprocal arrangement provided that the tax leviable under any such arrangement shall not exceed the tax leviable under the schedule provided further that the terms and conditions of every .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 18 2016 (HC)

Sri Yallappa S/O Mareppa Vs. The State of Karntaka & Ors

Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi

Decided on: Nov-18-2016

..... to extend the period beyond three months such extension however cannot exceed three months at a time the judgment states that if the ..... intention that even the order of extension of detention must not exceed three months at any one time one should not ignore the ..... continue the detention of the person concerned for such period not exceeding the maximum period specified in section 13 as it thinks fit .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 29 2016 (HC)

Adarsh Co-op. Housing Society Ltd. A Society registered under Maharash ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Apr-29-2016

..... at the state level only to regulate the building and construction activity with an investment exceeding rs 5 crores 1991 notification further necessitated the regulation in accordance with the norms ..... at the state level only to regulate the building and construction activity with an investment exceeding rs 5 crores by 1997 notification moef amended the 1991 notification the 1997 notification .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 11 2016 (SC)

Jindal Stainless Ltd. and Anr. Vs. State of Haryana and Ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Nov-11-2016

..... between the government of india and the government of that state for such period not exceeding ten years as has been stipulated in the agreement 108 the historic rationale behind incorporation ..... section 92 the provisions require the owner of every commercial goods vehicle of loading capacity exceeding four tonnes and not engaged in conveying certain specified classes of goods to pay contribution .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 16 2016 (HC)

Dr. Mahesh Vijay Bedekar Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Aug-16-2016

..... including noise emanating from vehicular movements and ensure that the existing noise levels do not exceed the ambient air quality standards specified under these rules 4 all development authorities local ..... midnight on or during any cultural or religious festive occasion of a limited duration not exceeding fifteen days in all during a calendar year the concerned state government shall generally .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 29 2016 (HC)

M/s. Amritlakshmi Machine Works and Another Vs. The Commissioner of Cu ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jan-29-2016

..... value is higher than the value thereof to a penalty not exceeding the difference between the declared value and the value thereof ..... of goods general11such person shall be liable to a penalty not exceeding onethousand rupees8 if any goods the importation or exportation of which ..... in any such offence shall be liable to a penalty not exceeding one thousand rupees 74 a perusal of the above provisions .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 04 2016 (HC)

Pondicherry Contract Carriage Owners' Association rep. by its Presiden ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-04-2016

..... omni buses hired on contract carriage for a period not exceeding 7 days 30 days and 90 days challenging the validity ..... vehicle plying without permit a vehicle permitted to carry exceeding 3 but not exceeding 29 passengers excluding driver rs 600 per seat per ..... with the entire registered seating capacity b vehicle permitted to carry exceeding 29 passengers excluding driver rs 1000 per seat per month .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 06 2016 (HC)

Fairdeal Polychem LLP and Others Vs. Union of India and Others

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-06-2016

..... basis of the preliminary findings recorded by the designated authority impose a provisional duty not exceeding the margin of dumping provided that no such duty shall be imposed before the expiry ..... investigations provided further that such duty shall remain in force only for a period not exceeding six months which may upon request of the exporters representing a significant percentage of the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 10 2016 (HC)

Satish N Vs. State of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Nov-10-2016

..... goods carriage permit b authorisation fee means the annual fee not exceeding one thousand rupees which may be charged by the appropriate authority ..... distributing goods carried by goods carriages ii of a sum not exceeding rupees five thousand in the case of any other agent or ..... device to the underside of the defendant s car but then exceeded the warrant s scope in both geography and length of time .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 10 2016 (HC)

N. Satish and Others Vs. State of Karnataka, Represented by its Princi ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Nov-10-2016

..... word taxi as being a motor cab having a seating capacity not exceeding six passengers excluding the driver with public service permit on contract ..... or distributing goods carried by goods carriages ii of a sum not exceeding rupees five thousand in the case of any other agent or ..... device to the underside of the defendant s car but then exceeded the warrant s scope in both geography and length of time .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Exceeding - Judgment Search Results