Exceeding - Judgment Search Results

United States Vs. Virginia

Court: US Supreme Court

..... at 556 remedy does not match the constitutional violation the commonwealth has shown no exceedingly persuasive justification for withholding from women qualified for the experience premier training of ..... related to the achievement of those objectives instead however the court proceeds to interpret exceedingly persuasive justification in a fashion that contradicts the reasoning of hogan and our other .....

Harbilas Rai Bansal Vs. State of Punjab and anr.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (1997)115PLR536

..... cent on such basic rent c exceeds rs 50 per mensem an increase not exceeding 25 per cent on such basic rent ii in the case of a ..... cent on such basic rent c exceeds rs 50 per mensem an increase not exceeding 30 per cent on such basic rent ii in the case of building ..... cent on such basic rent b exceeds rs 50 per mensem an increase not exceeding 50 per cent on such basic rent ii in the case of a .....

Most Rev. P.M.A. Metropolitan and Others, Etc. Vs. Moran Mar Marthoma ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1996SC3121; 1996(1)BLJR138; JT1996(3)SC446; 1996(3)SCALE89; (1996)8SCC470; [1996]3SCR857

..... three representatives those with 801 to 1200 families shall elect from representatives and those parishes exceeding 1200 families shall elect five representatives from among the lay members to the diocesan ..... member to be elected by the parishassembly of a parish church having membership exceeding 250 families not exceeding 500 families iv one more additional layman member to be elected by the .....

Ramakrishna Engg. Works Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1996)(83)ELT346TriDel

..... the clearances of the specified goods of an aggregate value not exceeding rupees sixty lakhs immediately following the said clearances of the ..... b from any factory by one or more manufacturers had exceeded rupees one hundred and fifty lakhs in the preceding financial ..... for home consumption in the previous financial year should not have exceeded rs 150 lakh the applicability clause is clause 4 of .....

Lewis Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... codispoti holds that a judge cannot impose a sentence exceeding six months imprisonment for multiple petty offenses without conducting a jury ..... that the crimes charged will not warrant a sentence exceeding six months the majority s speculation that the court s holding ..... more than one petty offense when the combined sentences will exceed six months imprisonment taken together the crimes then are .....

The Special Officer, Ambur Co-operative Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. the Speci ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1996)2MLJ544

..... of a registrar only in respect of casesinvolving a sum not exceeding rs 3 000 chief audit officers anddistrict co operative audit officers ..... 3 a cooperative sub registrar in cases involving a sum not exceeding rs 3 000 and those persons are empowered to perform ..... any joint registrar or deputy registrar in cases involving a sum exceeding rs 3 000 is accepted the expression any person specially .....

Corner Stone Brands Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1996)(86)ELT257TriDel

..... the assessable value under section 4 1 of the act of these sets exceeded rs 5 000 per set and demanding differential duty of rs 250 ..... and if so added the assessable values regarding each of the models would exceed rs 5 000 it was thus held that the higher of the ..... question calculated in accordance with section 4 of the act did not exceed rs 5 per pair they were exempt from charge of duty under the .....

Delton Cables Limited Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1997)(92)ELT555TriDel

..... of 1 5085 sq mm had to be taken as sectional area not exceeding 1 5 sq mm for the classification of the product in question he ..... the sectional area of 1 5085 sq mm had to be taken as exceeding 1 5 sq mm and therefore the goods in question were classifiable under ..... point even when the normal rounding is made could it be considered as exceeding 1 5 sq mm 7 for arriving at the sectional area there is .....

Smt. Suman Uday Bhobe Vs. State of Goa

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1996)98BOMLR873

..... in accordance with the following scale viz amount of claim i not exceeding rs 5 000 rs 10 ii exceeding rs 5 000 but notexceeding rs 50 000 1 4th of the ..... amount of claim iii exceeding rs 50 000 but not exceeding rs 1 lakh the amount of claim iv exceeding rs l lakh 1 of the amount of .....

Smt. C. Nirmala Kamath Vs. Commissioner for Transport and ors.

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1997KAR343

..... are in the state for periods shorter than a quarter but not exceeding thirty days 4 item 6 of part b of the schedule to ..... set out in the sub section is shorter than a quarter but not exceeding thirty days the expression is not quite intelligible because the period of30 ..... but if it remains in the state for a period exceeding 7 days but not exceeding 30 days then tax in respect thereof has to be .....