Exceeding - Judgment Search Results

Arizona Vs. California

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the following miscellaneous present perfected rights in arizona in annual quantities of water not to exceed the listed acre feet of diversion from the mainstream to supply the consumptive use ..... the following miscellaneous present perfected rights in california in annual quantities of water not to exceed the listed number of acre feet of diversions from the mainstream to supply the consumptive .....

Arizona Vs. California

Court: US Supreme Court

..... statute 1 the chemehuevi indian reservation in annual quantities not to exceed i 11 340 acre feet of diversions from the mainstream or ..... reasonably necessary to fulfill the purposes of the refuge not to exceed i 41 839 acre feet of water diverted from the mainstream ..... acre feet during any period of ten consecutive years and from exceeding a total consumptive use of such water exclusive of uses in .....

WisconsIn Vs. Fpc

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of compelling evidence it would not certificate initial rates and would suspend increased rates which exceeded these price levels footnote 7 second the commission announced that it would begin a series ..... costs whether other subsequent increases involved in separate proceedings not before us resulted in revenues exceeding cost of service in later years has no effect on the propriety of terminating .....

State of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Cheemalapati Ganeswara Rao and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1963SC1850; [1964]3SCR297

..... to mean that where the offences are punishable with imprisonment exceeding 10 years pardon may be granted to the approver no ..... only punishment provided for the offence should be imprisonment not exceeding 10 years the reason why two alternative maximum sentences are ..... transportation for life now imprisonment for life and imprisonment not exceeding 10 years appears to be that the offence is not .....

Agarwal Trading Corporation and ors. Vs. Asst. Collector of Customs an ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1964Cal347,1964CriLJ151

..... regulation act a person can be made liable to a penalty not exceeding three times the value of the foreign exchange in respect of ..... made thereunder he shall a be liable to such penalty not exceeding three times the value of the foreign exchange in respect of ..... of the foreign exchange regulations act the imposition of a penalty not exceeding three times the value of the foreign exchange in respect of .....

Bombay Indra Bhavan, Mysore Vs. Ramachandra Sastri (S.) and ors.

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: (1964)IILLJ280Kant

..... consideration of the relevant provisions of s 41 of the act the labour court had exceeded its jurisdiction by constituting itself into an appellate authority over the decision of the domestic ..... concern provided for automatic dismissal of a workman remaining absent without notice for a period exceeding fourteen consecutive days a workman who had remained absent in contravention of that order was .....

Shrimati Nanhibai Vs. the Excise Commissioner and ors.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1963MP352; 1963MPLJ526

..... any other officer of any shop in respect of which a licence fee exceeding rs 30 000 was obtained in the year 1962 63 or for which ..... of the excise commissioner if the bid offered in respect of a shop exceeded rs 30 000 or if a shop fetched in the previous year a ..... the excise commissioner if the bid offered in respect of a liquor shop exceeded rs 30 000 or if the shop fetched in the previous year a .....

Fateh Chand Vs. Balkishan Das

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1963SC1405; [1964]1SCR515

..... is entitled to receive from theparty who has broken the contract reasonable compensation not exceeding theamount so named or the penalty stipulated for therefore the section clearlycontemplates that the ..... by way ofpenalty the court will award to the party aggrieved only reasonablecompensation not exceeding the amount named or penalty stipulated thejurisdiction of the court is not determined by .....

Bengal Motion Pictures Employees Union, Calcutta Vs. Kohinoor Pictures ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1964Cal519,(1965)ILLJ387Cal

..... employments who shall be equal in number and independent persons not exceeding one third of its total number of members one of such ..... 24 it appears that the minimum wages fixed by the notification exceeded the total of the cash wages which the employers were paying ..... employments who shall be equal in number and independent persons not exceeding one tfllrd of its total number of members one of such .....

Arizona Vs. California

Court: US Supreme Court

..... other states throughout the debates that her conceivable needs would not exceed 300 000 acre feet which of course left 2 800 000 ..... the supply of any rights which may now exist shall not exceed four million four hundred thousand acre feet of the waters apportioned ..... the supply of any rights which may now exist shall not exceed four million four hundred thousand acre feet of the waters apportioned .....