Ex Parte - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: ex parte Page 1 of about 112 results (0.051 seconds)Parda Auto Parts and 5 ors. Vs. Commr. of Customs (P)
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Reported in: (2000)(68)ECC647
In the searches conducted in their premises, the Customs officers examined the documentation of acquisition of such diesel engines and came sets of appeals are filed by the concerns and their partners who are engaged in dealing with used diesel engines. In
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMpl Parts and Services Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Service Tax
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Reported in: (2007)10STJ153CESTAT(Chennai)
orders of the original authority and the appellate authority.4. After examining the records, I find that learned Commissioner (Appeals) forgot to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIndia Motor Parts and Accessories Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Court: Chennai
Reported in: [1981]130ITR311(Mad)
computation. On appeal by the assessee-company, the AAC confirmed the exclusion of these sums from the capital base, Thereupon, this matter of this court, to which one of us was a party, had in Madras Motor and General Insurance Co. Ltd. v.
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKovai Auto Parts Vs. Chief Cit (Tech)
Court: Chennai
Reported in: [2002]124TAXMAN346(Mad)
ORDERR. Jayasimha Babu, J. The point raised in these writ petitions is one which has been considered by us in...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTS. Hareesh, Part Time Sweeper Vs. the Superintendent of Post Offices S ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam
Mr. Justice K. Thankappan, Judicial Member The question raised in this Original Application has been considered by three judgments of...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGurudeen Parte Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
month. Till then the representation is decided, status-quo, as is existing today, shall be maintained. With the aforesaid, petition stands disposed Gurudeen Parte versus State & Ors W.P.No.15058/2012 13/09/2012 Shri Rashid Suhal Siddiqui,
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRam Bharose Parte Vs. Secretary the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
1 W.P. No.9800/2010 13.2.2014 Shri Brajesh Choubey, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri S.S. Bisen, learned Govt. Advocate for respondent...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDaon Auto Parts (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The Assistant Commissioner
Court: Chennai
filed, more particularly in paragraph No.13, the petitioner sought to explain as to why they did not respond to the pre-revision the respondent. In effect in the Writ Petitions filed, more particularly in paragraph No.13, the petitioner sought to explain as to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSuper Motor Parts vs.commissioner Trade and Taxes and Anr.
Court: Delhi
VALUE ADDED TAX & ANR. versus ........ RESPONDENTS SUPER MOTOR PARTS versus COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR......... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTrack Parts Corporation Vs. Collector of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Reported in: (1992)(38)ECC155
case though that case was with reference to the Central Excise Tariff Schedule of 1985. (This Schedule, like the Customs Tariff remain classified under that heading even if they are identifiable parts of machinery because of the operation of the exclusion clause
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>