Ex Parte - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: ex parte Page 1 of about 112 results (0.040 seconds)Parda Auto Parts and 5 ors. Vs. Commr. of Customs (P)
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Reported in: (2000)(68)ECC647
In the searches conducted in their premises, the Customs officers examined the documentation of acquisition of such diesel engines and came sets of appeals are filed by the concerns and their partners who are engaged in dealing with used diesel engines. In
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMpl Parts and Services Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Service Tax
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Reported in: (2007)10STJ153CESTAT(Chennai)
1. After examining the records and hearing both sides, I am of the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIndia Motor Parts and Accessories Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Court: Chennai
Reported in: [1981]130ITR311(Mad)
shareholders of the company and the money had been actually expended for the purpose. We are not called upon in this The Tribunal, after considering the respective contentions of both the parties, dismissed the appeals, making the following observation ;'We, therefore, hold
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKovai Auto Parts Vs. Chief Cit (Tech)
Court: Chennai
Reported in: [2002]124TAXMAN346(Mad)
ORDERR. Jayasimha Babu, J. The point raised in these writ petitions is one which has been considered by us in...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTS. Hareesh, Part Time Sweeper Vs. the Superintendent of Post Offices S ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam
Mr. Justice K. Thankappan, Judicial Member The question raised in this Original Application has been considered by three judgments of...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGurudeen Parte Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
month. Till then the representation is decided, status-quo, as is existing today, shall be maintained. With the aforesaid, petition stands disposed Gurudeen Parte versus State & Ors W.P.No.15058/2012 13/09/2012 Shri Rashid Suhal Siddiqui,
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRam Bharose Parte Vs. Secretary the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
1 W.P. No.9800/2010 13.2.2014 Shri Brajesh Choubey, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri S.S. Bisen, learned Govt. Advocate for respondent...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDaon Auto Parts (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The Assistant Commissioner
Court: Chennai
filed, more particularly in paragraph No.13, the petitioner sought to explain as to why they did not respond to the pre-revision the respondent. In effect in the Writ Petitions filed, more particularly in paragraph No.13, the petitioner sought to explain as to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSuper Motor Parts vs.commissioner Trade and Taxes and Anr.
Court: Delhi
VALUE ADDED TAX & ANR. versus ........ RESPONDENTS SUPER MOTOR PARTS versus COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR......... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTrack Parts Corporation Vs. Collector of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Reported in: (1992)(38)ECC155
find support in this finding of ours from the other exclusion Notes in the beginning of Chapter 84 wherein specific sub-headings hoses. The Tribunal also noted that Chapter Note 2(d) excluded parts made of hardened rubber only and concluded that if the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>