Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Ex Parte - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 15 2007

Greater Kailash Part-ii Welfare Association and ors. Vs. Dlf Universal ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: May-15-2007

Reported in: JT2007(7)SC260; 2007(7)SCALE712; (2007)6SCC448; 2007AIRSCW3517; AIR2007SC1938

been operating on the Savitri Cinema Plot ever since the Greater Kailash Part II Colony had come into existence, that is, for a period of about thirty years. The cinema hall was closed in 1997 by the … J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal involves the apprehension of serious traffic problems by the residents of Greater Kailash Part -II, Alaknanda Complex, Mandakini Enclave and Chittaranjan Park on account of the change of user of the plot


Dec 21 2018

Ge Energy Parts Inc. Vs.cit (International Taxation), Delhi-I

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-21-2018

matters Page 44 of 85 28.15. On a holistic consideration of the entire material before us, por una parte, there is primary, specific and original substantiated material relied by the ld. DR in the form of survey … Agreement (GSA) with GEIOC, for providing limited market support services to GE and its affiliates (including GEPI.). In exchange, it was remunerated on a cost-plus basis. It was assessed to income tax and also subjected to arms‟


Dec 21 2018

Ge Transportation Parts Llc vs.cit (International Taxation), Delhi-I

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-21-2018

on:24. 05.2018 Pronounced on:21. 12.2018 ITA6272017; ITA6282017; ITA6292017; ITA6712017; ITA6742017, C.M. APPL.29470/2017; ITA6752017, C.M. APPL.29471; ITA6772017 GE ENERGY PARTS INC. COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION), DELHI-I Versus ...... Appellant INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL ........ RESPONDENTS ITA6432017; ITA6462017; ITA6552017; ITA6692017 &


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 20 2019

Ge Energy Parts Inc vs.the Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax & Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Aug-20-2019

CIT (A) upheld the order of the AO in so far initiation of proceedings under Sectionof the Act, existence of PE and attribution of income were concerned. However, the appeal was allowed on the issue of levy … HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 5577/2018 and CM APPL. 21731/2018 (stay) + + GE ENERGY PARTS INC Through Mr. Sachit Jolly & Mr. Aarush Bhatia, Advocates ........ Petitioner Versus THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX


Jan 05 2026

Ge Energy Parts Inc vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-05-2026

that the petitioner is having a PE in India and therefore, when the order dated 16.05.2025 waspassed, there existed some rationale or justification. However, by orderdated 17.10.2025, such finding has been set aside by the ITAT and … DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of decision: 5th January, 2026. + W.P.(C) 10259/2025, CM APPL. 42653/2025 GE ENERGY PARTS INC .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Tushar Jarwal, Mr. Rahul Sateeja & Mr. Vikrant A Maheshwari,versusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX


Jan 05 2026

Ge Global Parts and Products Gmbh vs Assistant Commissioner of Income ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-05-2026

that the petitioner is having a PE in India and therefore, when the order dated 16.05.2025 waspassed, there existed some rationale or justification. However, by orderdated 17.10.2025, such finding has been set aside by the ITAT and … DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of decision: 5th January, 2026. + W.P.(C) 10259/2025, CM APPL. 42653/2025 GE ENERGY PARTS INC .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Tushar Jarwal, Mr. Rahul Sateeja & Mr. Vikrant A Maheshwari,versusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX


Sep 24 2010

Deepak Maruti Parte. Vs the State of MaharashtrA. and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Sep-24-2010

one Sukhadeo (PW1, brother of the deceased) that deceased was assaulted and lying outside the house of Smt.Yamunabai Parte near the public toilet in the same locality where deceased was staying. On knowing this, he rushed to … the evidence adduced as against present appellant is required to be analyzed.9. According to the prosecution, appellant made extrajudicial confession before the parents of the deceased i.e. PW3 & PW5), independently. Allegedly appellant disclosed the incident and


Mar 06 2013

Motor Spare Parts Second Hand and Iron Merchants Assocn. Vs. Executive ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-06-2013

Association, rep by its President, P. Meera Mohideen, No.12, Chandrabanu Street, Pudupet, Chennai-600 002 .. Petitioner Vs 1. Executive Engineer, B. Canal Division, Public Works Department, Chepauk, Madras-5 2. State of Tamil Nadu Rep by its Commissioner … and 9020 of 2009 and M.P.Nos.1 of 2009 and 2 of 2009 W.P.No.7384 of 2009 ------------------- Motor Spare Parts (Second Hand) and Iron Merchants Association, rep by its President, P. Meera Mohideen, No.12, Chandrabanu Street, Pudupet, Chennai-600


Jan 23 2013

India Motor Parts and Accessories Limited Vs. the Deputy Commissioner ...

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jan-23-2013

UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23-01-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.2378/13 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1. TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 26 11.2012. EXHIBIT P2. TRUE COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM … 23RD DAY OF JANUARY 2013 3RD MAGHA 193 WP(C).No. 2378 of 2013 (V) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------- INDIA MOTOR PARTS & ACCESSORIES LIMITED, DOOR NO.32/510A, MAHAKAVI VAILOPPILLY ROAD, PALARIVATTOM PO, ERNAKULAM, COCHIN 68202 , REPRESENTED BY SRI.PREM ANAND,


Sep 12 2012

Gurudeen Parte Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Sep-12-2012

Gurudeen Parte versus State & Ors W.P.No.15058/2012 13/09/2012 Shri Rashid Suhal Siddiqui, learned counsel for the petitioner. Considering the fact … a speaking order within a period of one month. Till then the representation is decided, status-quo, as is existing today, shall be maintained. With the aforesaid, petition stands disposed of. Certified Copy as per rules. (Rajendra Menon)


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial