Ex P V Was - Judgment Search Results
Babu.P.V. vs Radhakrishnan.P.V.
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Mar-02-2023
down. The writ petition fails and it is dismissed. Sd/- T.R.RAVI JUDGE SKP/02-03 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 6192/2023 PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 COPY OF DEED NO. 4480/2008 OF THE EDAPPAL SUB REGISTRY DTD. 06-08-2008 EXHIBIT P2 COPY OF … OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI THURSDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF MARCH 2023 / 11TH PHALGUNA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 6192 OF 2023 PETITIONER: 1 BABU P.V. AGED 44 YEARS S.O.KRISHNAN PATTERI VALAPPIL HOUSE, CHANGARAMKULAM,
P.V.S. Vencatachellum Vs. P.V.S. Kabalamurthy Pillai
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-03-1954
Reported in: AIR1955Mad350
proceedings we are not concerned with that partition suit.4. This Sri P. Venkatachalam had a son by name P.V. Subramania Pillai who carried the business after his father. (We are not concerned here wife the other four … agreed to or determined from time to time; that the defendant be restrained by a permanent injunction from executing or otherwise enforcing against the plaintiff the order of eviction obtained by him against the plaintiff and from
P.V.S. Kabalamurthi Pillai Vs. P.V. Subramania Pillai and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-07-1930
Reported in: AIR1931Mad500; (1931)60MLJ332
amount of remuneration to which the receivers are entitled? The point really turns on the meaning of the expression 'gross sales' in the Order of Court, dated 2nd June, 1925. Paragraph 13 of the Order reads thus:With … that they should be continued but that in the interests of the' estate their duties should be more precisely denned than in the orders under which they were appointed. [His Lordship stated the facts and after dealing … Venkatasubba Rao, J.1. This summons is taken out by the 5th defendant. He
18-section briefs on any result in this list
P.V.S. Krishnamurthy Pillai and anr. Vs. P.V.S. Sundaramurthy Pillai a ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-21-1931
Reported in: AIR1932Mad381
Subbaraya Pillai predeceased him leaving a son Sundaramurthi. Another son of P. Venkatachalam, namely, Subramania Pillai was appointed executor of his last will and testament. Another son Murugesam Pillai and some others including Sundaramurthi Pillai instituted C. … Ramesam, J.1. The facts out of which these appeals arise are briefly these: One P. Venkatachalam was a well-known condiment and ice manufacturer of Madras. He acquired considerable property and died. One of his
P.V.S. Kabalamurthi Pillai Vs. P.V. Subramania Pillai and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-08-1930
Reported in: 131Ind.Cas.655
amount of remuneration to which, the receivers are entitled? The point really turns on the meaning of the expression 'gross sale' in the order of Court dated the 2nd June, 1925. Paragraph 12 of the order reads … that they should be continued but that in the interests of the estate their duties should be more precisely defined than in the orders under which they were appointed.2. [His Lordship stated the facts and dealt with … Venkatasubba Rao, J.1. This summons is taken out by the 5th defendant. He
P.V.S. Krishnamurthi Pillai and anr. by Guardian Kokilambal Ammal Vs. ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-21-1913
Reported in: (1932)63MLJ37
Subbaraya Pillai predeceased him leaving a son Sundaramurthi. Another son of P. Venkatachalam, namely, Subramania Pillai, was appointed executor of his last will and testament. Another son Murugesam Pillai and some others including Sundaramurthi Pillai instituted C.S. … Ramesam, J.1. The facts out of which these appeals arise are briefly these: One P. Venkatachalam was a well-known condiment and ice manufacturer of Madras. He acquired considerable property and died. One of his
P.V. Muhtu Amma and Three ors. Vs. P.V. Gopalan and Twenty-two ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-30-1912
Reported in: (1913)ILR36Mad593
cover a case like the present one. He also refers to Parvathi v. Kamaran (1888) 6 Mad. 341 where it; was held that a male … into account. The Munsif then refers to the fact that 'the present day husband of a Marumakkathayam female expects her to live with him and that it is even considered derogatory for the husband to have to … 1. The plaintiffs in the suit are a Nair lady and her children and the suit is for maintenance for a
P.V. Prasanna Kumar and Another Vs. M/S Balaji Constructions, Rep. by ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jan-20-2014
of Rs. 1 lakh unnecessarily collected from him towards the garden site v) To refund Rs.13,000/- which was paid by him towards flat regularization charges … The opposite party No.1 had to provide certain amenities compulsorily and it was printed in the brochure that extra amenities would be provided for which the complainant paid Rs.50,000/- for extra provisions like Municipal drinking water, drainage … of by a common order: F.A.No.649/2012 is taken for discussion as a lead case. This is an appeal preferred by the complainant against the order in C.C.No.80/2011 dated 07-3-2012 on the file of District Forum, Kadapa. For
Chowk Mosque, Nandyal, by Mutavalli P.V.H. Abdul Razack Miah Vs. P.V.H ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-20-1998
Reported in: 1999(1)ALD396; 1999(1)ALT310
the Tribunal constituted under Section 83 of the Act. Therefore, the learned Principal District Munsif has failed to exercise jurisdiction vested in him in holding that the Civil Courts have no jurisdiction to try the suit.6. The … ORDER1. The Civil Revision Petition is filed against the order in IA No.985 of 1997 in OS No.469 of 1997 passed by the … in the mosque premises.3. The learned District Munsif, Nandyal held that in view of Section 83 of the A.P. Wakf Act, 1995 (for short 'the
N.P. Sankaran Nair Vs. P.V. Rama Iyer
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Sep-08-1959
Reported in: AIR1960Ker131
the Cochin Harbour Railway station which ran as follows : 'Collections of date received from S. M. (1) P. V. Rama Iyer at 14 hours. Rs. 286-3-0 against Rs. 96-8-0 or Rs. 10-5-0 short. Same spent by S. … own costs. The claim against the second defendant is dismissed with costs.'The decree in so far as it exonerates the second defendant from liability is not in controversy before us.3. The plaintiffs case as against the first
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free